Engineering Salmonella for Cancer Treatment
Section
Engineered Microbes for Cancer Treatment
By Isaac Johnson
At right is a sample image insertion. It works for any image uploaded anywhere to MicrobeWiki.
The insertion code consists of:
Double brackets: [[
Filename: PHIL_1181_lores.jpg
Thumbnail status: |thumb|
Pixel size: |300px|
Placement on page: |right|
Legend/credit: Magnified 20,000X, this colorized scanning electron micrograph (SEM) depicts a grouping of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteria. Photo credit: CDC. Every image requires a link to the source.
Closed double brackets: ]]
Other examples:
Bold
Italic
Subscript: H2O
Superscript: Fe3+
Sample citations: [1]
[2]
A citation code consists of a hyperlinked reference within "ref" begin and end codes.
To repeat the citation for other statements, the reference needs to have a names: "<ref name=aa>"
The repeated citation works like this, with a forward slash.[1]
Introduction
Cancer is perhaps the most notorious disease on Earth. Over decades of research, four major therapies have been developed: surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy (Hompland et al. 2021). However, cancerous cells that rapidly proliferate often outgrow the surrounding vasculature, developing regions of hypoxia (Chen et al. 2023). Hypoxic conditions directly lead to treatment resistance of all therapies but surgery. Radiotherapy relies on the presence of molecular oxygen to generate reactive oxygen species to induce cell damage (Menegakis et al. 2021), while chemo- and immunotherapeutic drugs are administered through the circulatory system, and therefore have inherently lower drug uptake with limited vasculature (Ho et al. 2022). Furthermore, hypoxia reduces the cytotoxicity of these drugs and can trigger metastasis (Ho et al. 2022).
A solution may lie in bacterial-based treatments. Far from being a new discovery, bacterial treatments were observed by Dr. William Coley in the 19th century when injections of Streptococcus pyogenes led to tumor regression (McCarthy 2006). While the results reported by Coley were promising, many highlighted inconsistencies in his methods and doubted their legitimacy. Later, with the advent of radiotherapy in the 1890s and chemotherapy in the 1930s, bacterial treatments were forgotten. In hindsight, Coley’s experiments were an early, rudimentary form of immunotherapy. Tumors evade or suppress a patient’s immune system through various molecular pathways (Tie et al. 2022), but an infection can naturally stimulate the immune system and trigger the body’s defense mechanisms against a tumor.
Unsurprisingly, bacteria alone are insufficient cancer treatments, but they have several advantages that are not found in current methods. Unlike chemotherapy and immunotherapy, many bacteria do not require the circulatory system to propagate within a host. Additionally, many bacteria are facultative anaerobes and thrive in hypoxic conditions. Not only would certain species be able to penetrate a tumor, but they could grow within the tumor microenvironment as well (Zhou et al. 2018). Unfortunately, bacteria’s innate stimulation of the immune system is often inefficient in eliminating cancer, unpredictable from patient to patient, and can cause several negative effects which may outweigh the possible benefits. However, genetic engineering is enabling researchers to inhibit a bacterium’s virulence, increase its localization to tumors, and implement novel treatment strategies based on chemo- and immunotherapeutic approaches (Gurbatri et al. 2022).
This article focuses on recent engineering efforts on Salmonella typhimurium, a gram-negative, rod-shaped pathogen. S. typhimurium is one of the leading causes of foodborne illness, known to cause gastroenteritis in humans and animals (Fàbrega and Vila, 2013). However, several characteristics make it a promising candidate for cancer therapy. It has flagella allowing for movement and is facultatively anaerobic, allowing it to thrive in hypoxic conditions. Additionally, it is an intracellular pathogen capable of infiltrating and reproducing inside host cells (Guo et al. 2020). Lastly, and most importantly, it is a well-studied species with a fully sequenced genome (McClelland et al. 2001).
Safety and Specificity
Salmonella typhimurium is naturally retained in tumor microenvironments (TMEs) due to selective colonization: after initial dosing, the bacteria delivered to the tumor is approximately equal to the amount of bacteria colonizing surrounding tissues. However, outside of the immunosuppressive environment of the TME, the surrounding bacteria die while bacteria in the TME proliferate (Zhou et al. 2018). This results in an approximate 1,000-fold increase of tumor colonization compared to other tissues (Gurbatri et al. 2022). While this is clearly beneficial, S. typhimurium will also accumulate in healthy organs. For this reason, genetically-engineered strategies have been developed to increase specificity and safety.
Virulence Knockouts
One such strategy involves knocking out certain genes of S. typhimurium. Gram-negative bacteria like Salmonella have a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) outer membrane—polysaccharide chains extending from the cell—that protects the cell from exterior toxins and bile salts (Bertani and Ruiz, 2018). These polysaccharides are rooted in the membrane by lipid A, a toxic molecule responsible for much of S. typhimurium’s pathogenicity. Upon bacterial lysis by the host’s immune system, lipid A is released from the membrane and triggers the expression of inflammatory proteins like TNFɑ (Raetz and Whitfield, 2002). While this pathway is essential for stimulating the immune system and eliminating infections, it is dangerous in cases of severe infection. A surplus of lipid A will prompt an overproduction of inflammatory factors, triggering blood clotting, septic shock, and possibly death (Esmon et al. 2000).
Since the LPS membrane is critical for bacterial survival, a given knockout strain must disarm the toxic capabilities of lipid A while retaining its role in membrane structure. By measuring TNFɑ induction between strains, researchers found that the deletion of the msbB gene in S. typhimurium produced viable cells with a 10-fold decrease in pathogenicity, along with retaining all of its previous tumor-targeting abilities (Low et al. 1999). Loss of the msbB gene prevents the myristoylation of lipid A, a lipid modification reaction crucial for downstream pathways.
This attenuated strain of S. typhimurium, named VNP20009, was isolated and tested in a mouse melanoma model, causing tumor regression (Low et al. 1999). It was subsequently implemented in clinical trials. These trials revealed that while VNP20009 was safe for patients, tumors were weakly colonized and no significant regressive effects were observed (Toso et al. 2002). These results suggested that TNFɑ induction may have been critical to Salmonella’s antitumor properties, emphasizing the difficulty of achieving both safe and efficacious treatments (Gurbatri et al. 2022).
Auxotrophic Knockouts
Another strategy is to design auxotrophic strains of attenuated S. typhimurium: knockout strains unable to synthesize certain biomolecules necessary for growth, rendering them dependent on exterior sources. In addition to the msbB gene, VNP20009 also contains a purI gene knockout, rendering them dependent on exterior adenine (Low et al. 1999). Another strain of Salmonella, A1-R, was rendered auxotrophic for both leucine and arginine (Zhou et al. 2005). These molecules are enriched in the neoplastic tissue of tumors but not in regular tissue, thereby inhibiting growth outside the TME. Further testing in murine models showed significant tumor localization and regression of metastatic prostate cancer (Zhou et al. 2007), but safety concerns prevented A1-R from moving on to clinical trials.
Surface Proteins
Rather than knocking out certain genes, other studies seek to express exogenous surface protein moieties that enable specific binding to tumors. One such study expressed a camelid single-domain antibody (conjugated against human CD20 tumor antigens) on the surface of attenuated S. typhimurium (Massa et al. 2013). Rather than a conventional antibody with a heavy and light chain, single-domain antibodies are naturally produced by camelids and are composed of a singular heavy chain (Harmsen and De Haard, 2007). These antibodies provide several advantages: they are more soluble in water (Stanfield et al. 2004), more temperature-resistant (van der Linden et al. 1999), and simply less bulky, allowing for greater tissue permeability (Monegal et al. 2009). The researchers cloned this single-domain antibody into lentivectors, which then inserted the sequence into the S. typhimurium genome (Massa et al. 2013). Tumor localization and infection was significantly increased for CD20-expressing tumors both in vitro and in vivo.
Another study modified a preexisting surface protein in Salmonella: the outer membrane protein A, or OmpA (Park et al. 2016). Researchers added a three residue sequence, R-G-D, to the outer loop of OmpA using a plasmid vector. The RGD peptide binds specifically to ɑvβ3 integrin, a receptor protein widely expressed on certain cancers during angiogenesis. Two other strains of S. typhimurium, one with wild-type OmpA and one with a triple alanine peptide in the outer loop, were engineered as controls to compare tumor-targeting abilities. The RGD peptide strain showed strong and prolonged localization in mouse models of human breast cancer (Park et al. 2016). Together, these results highlight the variety of strategies employed to increase the safety and specificity of S. typhimurium strains.
Treatment Mechanisms
While tumor localization is crucial for any cancer therapy, bacterial properties alone are not enough to cause significant tumor regression. Therefore, different treatment mechanisms against tumors are being engineered using Salmonella as a mode of delivery.
Synchronized Lysis Circuits
One such treatment involved genetic lysis circuits (Din et al. 2016). S. typhimurium is an intracellular pathogen, meaning it is capable of infiltrating and replicating within host cells. After localization to a tumor, genetically-programmed cell lysis can administer cytotoxic compounds directly inside the cancer cells. It is important to note that although Salmonella is contained in a vacuole inside the host cell, many toxins readily cross the membrane through pores and are able to elicit a biological effect. The researchers accomplished this programmed cell lysis by coupling previously characterized positive and negative feedback mechanisms (Danino et al. 2010) to generate quorum-sensing oscillatory dynamics, or a synchronized lysis circuit (SLC). A promoter, luxI, regulates the expression of an autoinducer, AHL. AHL binds with a LuxR cofactor, enabling luxI transcriptional induction and completing the positive feedback mechanism. AHL can translocate between neighboring cells, thereby synchronizing different circuits. The expression of the bacteriophage lysis gene ɸX174E is also regulated by the luxI promoter, leading to the negative feedback loop of cell lysis.
This SLC, carried on a plasmid, was transformed into attenuated S. typhimurium and tested in microfluidic devices to gauge population dynamics. As expected, researchers observed a slow buildup of bacteria until a quorum threshold was reached, triggering widespread lysis and releasing bacterial contents into the device. A small but consistent number of bacteria remained after each lysis event to proliferate and start the cycle again. Naturally, the next step was to heterologously express cytotoxic compounds in the SLC strain of S. typhimurium. The cytotoxic compound they selected was hemolysin E, or HlyE.
A previous study designed a novel, hypoxia-induced promoter fused to the cytotoxic protein HlyE (Ryan et al. 2009). As a facultative anaerobe, S. typhimurium naturally expresses FNR, a transcription factor. This protein dimerizes in the presence of iron-sulfur ion clusters which only form in the absence of oxygen (Green et al. 1996). The formation of these clusters—and the dimerized complex that results—increases binding to DNA and recruitment of RNA polymerase. Therefore, FNR-responsive promoters are induced by hypoxic conditions.
While FNR-responsive promoters are induced by hypoxic conditions, there remain low levels of transcription in oxygenic conditions (Khoroshilova et al. 1995). Before fusing a promoter to a cytotoxic compound, researchers sought to mutate a promoter so transcription is exclusively activated in the hypoxic conditions of a tumor. FF+20, an FNR-responsive promoter in E. coli, was chosen for the study. The -10 promoter element was mutated, lowering transcription levels but increasing dependence on FNR. The novel FNR-dependent promoter, FF+20*, was then fused to hlyE, encoding for the cytotoxic protein hemolysin E (Ryan et al. 2009). Hemolysin E, derived from E. coli, is a pore-forming toxin shown to have anti-tumor effects (Chiang and Huang, 2021).
This FF+20*-hlyE construct was cloned into plasmids and transformed into the SLC strain of S. typhimurium, giving the new strain (SLC-hly) the cytotoxic capability crucial for tumor regression (Din et al. 2016). When HeLa cancer cells were cocultured with SLC-hly, they observed cell death after bacterial lysis, showing efficient toxin production and release. However, in vivo experiments with mice showed little tumor regression despite oscillatory bacterial lysis being observed. To combat this, they generated two other SLC strains containing different compounds: one with mCCL21 for host immune cell recruitment (Loeffler et al. 2009), and one with CDD-iRGD to trigger tumor cell apoptosis (Chen et al. 2013). Interestingly, the latter construct uses the pro-apoptotic protein (CDD) fused to the same RGD peptide discussed in Section 2.3 that binds to the ɑvβ3 integrin receptor on tumors (Park et al. 2016). An equal mixture of all three strains, dubbed SLC-3, elicited the strongest in vivo tumor regression than any singular strain. Unfortunately, it also proved to be more lethal than its SLC-hly counterpart, highlighting the difficult balance between potency and safety in cancer treatments.
Section 4
Conclusion
References
Authored for BIOL 238 Microbiology, taught by Joan Slonczewski,at Kenyon College,2024
