Evolution of SARS-CoV-2

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
Revision as of 16:42, 17 April 2023 by Unknown user (talk)


By Christian Harris

Background

Virus Mutations and Recombination


Virus particles consist of genetic material (DNA or RNA) as well as proteins and enzymes necessary to enter a host cell, replicate their genome, and produce more virus particles. The genome of both DNA and RNA viruses can be single or double stranded, with a segmented, circular, or linear structure Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tagCite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag.

DNA viruses have mutation rates similar to that of eukaryotic organisms because they possess enzymes with proofreading functions. Mutation rates are also impacted by the presence of mutagens (such as UV light, X-rays, and some chemicals), natural behavior of bases, and mistakes in nucleic acid replication Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag. Viral recombination occurs when two parent strains “coinfect” the same host cell, resulting in a new strain with genes from both parents. Successful recombinations mostly occur when the parent strains are the same virus type, having a similar genomeCite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag. While mutations may occur to adapt to new hosts, alphacoronavirus and betacoronavirus primarily infect mammals while gammacoronavirus and deltacoronavirus primarily infect birds and mammals [1]. The name coronavirus stems from its corona-like appearance caused by spike proteins when viewed under an electron transmission microscope [2]. Coronaviruses are about 80-120 nm[3] in diameter and store their genetic information as positive-sense single-stranded mRNA Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag. Their genome ranges between 27 and 32 kilobases which is more than twice the size of other conventional RNA viruses[4]. Coronaviruses possess a proofreading enzyme, the nonstructural protein (NSP) 14 endonuclease, which significantly reduces their mutation rate to a degree similar to DNA viruses and mediating recombination Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag.

Coronavirus history


It is estimated that the common ancestor of coronaviruses appeared roughly 10,000 years ago and gave rise to the 4 genera 4000 to 5,000 years ago [2]. Bats and birds, warm blooded flying vertebrates were ideal gene sources for coronavirus. Bats gave rise to the genera Alphacoronavirus and Betacoronavirus while birds gave rise to the genera Gammacoronavirus and Deltacoronavirus [5], explaining why Alphacoronavirus and Betacoronavirus tend to infect mammals and take precedence in research[6]. The first human coronaviruses (B814) was first discovered in 1965 causing a common cold, however it wasn’t until a few years later that the coronavirus classification was created. Within the coming decades, two new human coronavirus variants (HCoV0229E and HCoV-OC43) were discovered and caused a cycle of epidemics, however symptoms were generally mild [7]Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag . The symptoms experienced by infected animals were more severe than that experienced by humans at the time, including (but not limited to): gastroenteritis, hepatitis, encephalitis, and pneumonitis [8] . It wasn’t until 2002 that coronavirus was considered highly pathogenic to humans when severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1), transferred from infected bats to people, broke out in Southern China [5][9]. SARS-CoV-1 was spread throughout Asia, which has infected 8422 people and caused 916 deaths[10]. Since then, many new strands of coronavirus have been reported, some of them threatening. The most threatening new animal coronavirus strains are swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus (SADS-CoV), swine transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), and avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag. The variants HCoV-NL63, HCoV-HKU1 proved to be similar to HCoV0229E and HCoV-OC43 as hosts only experienced mild symptoms. MERS-CoV has caused 858 deaths since 2012 when it spread throughout parts of the Middle East and Africa Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag, however the cause of the first human infection of SARS-CoV-2 is still unknown[11]. Some have hypothesized that the virus may have originated within a lab, however there is little to no such evidence. Another more likely hypothesis is that the virus was directly transferred from an animal, most likely some intermediate host, to a person[11]Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag), meaning an intermediate host was likely for mutations in the spike proteins to occur Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag. For this reason, it is able to infect a wide variety of animals and is said to have a ‘generalist’ nature[12]. Spillover occurs from humans to animals as evident by the minimal adaptation required for SARS-CoV-2 to infect mink and deer[12]. For the same reason, it can back-spill to human populations as was seen at Dutch mink farms[13].


Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 to other severe HCoVs


SARS-CoV-2 is the most well known human respiratory coronavirus as it causes coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), however other types, such as SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV, came before[14]. Clinical symptoms of SARS-CoV-1 are similar to that of SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV is proven to be worse[15]. The exact case fatality rate (CFR) is difficult to measure because those with mild symptoms are less likely to seek professional help and thus be recorded. The estimated CRF of SARS-CoV-2 was 8.7% in 2020[16], which is similar to SARS-CoV-1, but smaller than MERS-CoV which are 10% and 34% respectively [15].. As of recently (April 16th of 2023), the estimated CRF is less than 1% worldwide[17] . During the incubation period (time between infection and symptoms), viruses can still be spread[18]; however these viruses have similar incubation periods of about three to four days[15][19]. What makes SARS-CoV-2 unique is its abilities to spread through aerosols (from normal breathing) and respiratory droplets (coughs and sneezes)[20] and remain viable as an aerosol for upwards of two hours[15]. SARS-CoV-1 also has the capabilities to spread through respiratory droplets, however little evidence has been shown regarding their ability to spread through aerosols[21] and the majority of transmission occurred through direct contact[15].. MERS-CoV is thought to spread between people through respiratory droplets, however there is little documentation to fully understand. In fact, most cases of MERS-CoV can be traced back to direct contact with infected camels[22]. The high transmission rates can be explained by the unique structure of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein. The S protein of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-1 bind to the ACE2 receptor while MERS-CoV spike proteins bind to dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4)[15].. The S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 has 12 extra nucleotides within the N-terminal domain, creating a furin-like cleavage site at the S1/S2 boundary, facilitating the priming of the S protein[15][23]. In SARS-CoVs, the receptor-binding motif (RBM), is the main functional motif that forms the binds with the human ACE2 (ACE2) receptor[24]. When comparing the SARS-CoV-2 genome to that of bat coronaviruses, they found high similarities to the variants bat-SL-CoVZC45 and SL-CoVZXC21 with similarities of 88.0% and 87.2% respectively[15].. The greatest sequence variation is found in the S gene at 75%, demonstrating the belief that changes in the S protein are the primary cause of its success[15]..

Production of SARS-CoV-2 Variants


As mentioned previously, coronaviruses possess an NSP 14 endonuclease enzyme, which significantly reduces their mutation rate to a degree similar to DNA viruses and recombinationCite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag, however the spike gene mutation rate is four to five times higher than the rest of the genome Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag. An infected individual will produce an estimated 3x105 to 3x108 “infectious units”Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag.

Coronaviruses display a particularly high (incomplete linkage) recombination rate with the help of the NSP 14 endonuclease enzyme and SARS-CoV-2 is no exceptionCite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag. A study conducted late in 2022 identified 589 recombination events out of 1.6 million samples, indicating that 2.7% of sequenced SARS-CoV-2 genomes have detectable recombinant ancestry. Similar to mutations, recombination rates are more likely to occur near the spike protein gene. Up to this point, these recombinant variants identified have not been particularly successfulCite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag.


SARS-CoV-2 Variants


When SARS-CoV-2 first emerged in 2019, there was one prevalent strain. Since then, a multitude of variants have been found within patients and sequenced[25]. The majority of variants are not rigorously studied and quickly go extinctCite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag .

Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.135), and Gamma (P.1)


The Alpha, Beta, and Gamma (which are different than alphacoronavirus, betacoronavirus, and gammacoronavirus) variants were the first of the detected SARS-CoV-2 variants that had the potential to prolong the pandemic[26]. The Alpha variant (B.1.1.7 lineage) was discovered in Great Britain in late 2020 [27]. This strain quickly spread around the world and was the dominant one in North America[28][29]. B.1.1.7 originally exhibited seventeen important mutations including amino acid replacements and deletions on the spike protein, ORF1ab, ORF8, and the nucleoprotein[30]. B.1.1.7 originally exhibited seventeen mutations which included several RBD mutations including N501Y and P681H, as well as several non-spike mutations[31] . The N501Y mutation greatly increases the affinity to the ACE2 receptor[32] and the P681 mutation increases resistance to beta interferon[33]. These mutations also decreased the amount of virions required to establish an infection[34], boosting the transmission rate by 50% and severity by 48%[29][35] . Sub-lineages of B.1.1.7 were quickly discovered in Germany and the Czech Republic with two additional mutations on the spike gene[36]. By September of 2021, the widespread transmission of B.1.1.7 had ended[27].

The Beta variant (B.1.135 lineage) was first documented in South Africa in May 2020[29] and was particularly prominent in Africa, accounting for upwards of 80% of cases during its peak, but was also rapidly spread throughout Europe and Asia[27]. B.1.135 exhibited nine mutations in spike protein which included N501Y, E484K and K417N[35] . These mutations together increased the affinity ten-fold compared to the original variant[37][38] It was also far more severe than the Alpha variant with a 59% increase in mortality rate[35] , reduced antibody treatment effectiveness [39]. By November of 2021, the widespread transmission of B.1.135 had ended[27].

The last of the three original variants to emerge was gamma (B.1.1.28.1 lineage under alias of P.1) which was discovered in Brazil in November of 2020 and faded in late 2021[27] . P.1 exhibits eight lineage-defining mutations including three mutations in the receptor-binding domain: L18F, N501Y, E484K and K417T (different from K417N)[35] . The K417T mutation causes a minor difference in the spike protein structure compared to the K417N mutation, so the combination of the N501Y, E484K and K417T mutations also increases affinity ten-fold[40]. The L18F mutation is responsible for the binding potential of neutralizing antibodies[41]. This also led to a higher rate of hospitalization and morbidity[29].

Delta (B.1.617.2)


In late 2020, the Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant (B.1.617.2) was discovered in India and would go on to become the predominant variant globally[42]. The Delta variant has 23 mutations, with the most important being E484Q and L452R RBD mutations, a P681R cleavage site mutation, and mutations on ORF3 and ORF7[35] . The L452R mutation increases the affinity of the spike protein for the ACE2 receptor[43] while also decreasing the immune system's recognition capabilities[44]. These mutations resulted in drastic improvements in transmission abilities and antibody treatment effectiveness[45]. For almost a year, the B1.617.2 was by far the most common variant worldwide. While previous variants had accounted for up to 80% of SARS-CoV-2 cases within a continent at a given time, the Delta variant accounted for nearly 100% of cases in every continent excluding Africa[27]. There is no surprise that the Delta lineage gave rise to many sublineages, most notably AY.4.2[46]. This sublineage is believed to be 10% more contagious than other variants due to a mutation in the N-terminal domain[47]. This reign of prominence lasted between July and December of 2021, however cases continue to be reported in 2023[27].

Omicron (B.1.1.529)


In November of 2021, the Omicron variant was documented and has since been the primary variant of concern. As of April 16th, 2023, omicron is the only COVID-19 causing variant to be labeled as a “Variant of Concern” according to the CDC[48] . The original strain of Omicron was far more transmissible than previous strains due to upwards of 30 mutations that operated on the spike protein[42]. It spread rapidly and produced infectious sub variants[42]. The predominant sub variant has been BQ.1.1 since its emergence in July of 2022[49], until a new subvariant created from the recombination of Omicron sub lineages, XB.1.5, was discovered in late 2022. The XB.1.5 subvariant is the most transmissible so far[50], accounting for approximately 83% of the COVID-19 cases in the United States in April of 2023[51]. The new sub variants XB.1.16, XB.1.9.1, and XB,1.9.2 have also begun to spread throughout the United States and are projected to account for a higher percentage of COVID-19 cases in the futureCite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag. Methods of creating these vaccines differ, however all produce T-lymphocytes and B-lymphocytes that can effectively fight the virus[52]. Over 13 billion vaccinations have been provided worldwide[53] which is much larger than the human population of 8 billion[54] . This can be misleading because there are two doses and a booster availableCite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag which explains why the Alpha, Beta, and Gamma SARS-CoV-2 variants are no longer variants of concern, however newer variants are. Vaccines are not perfect, as ‘breakthrough infections’ by the Delta and Omicron variants have occurred in vaccinated individuals, however the symptoms are less severe and transmission is less likely[42]. Until the vaccination rates rise, variants of SARS-CoV-2 will continue to spread[55]. Also, a substantial amount of effort and resources have been dedicated towards the surveillance of new mutations and recombination events[56]. During the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the genomic data generation has exceeded the capacities of existing analysis platforms, making it difficult to provide real-time analysis on viral evolution [56]Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag.

Reputable Sources Updated Regularly


Over the course of three and a half years, many variants have been discovered and wreaked havoc on the human population. This page serves as a review of SARS-CoV-2 up till April 16, 2023, however SARS-CoV-2 will continue to evolve.

Important SARS-CoV-2 Variants with Classification: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant-classifications.html

Information about Variants of Concern and a list of all Variants seen within a year: https://cov-lineages.org[27]

SARS-CoV-2 Variant Proportions within the United States: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportionsCite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag

  1. Coronavirus: Detailed taxonomy. AVMA. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/AVMA-Detailed-Coronoavirus-Taxonomy-2020-02-03.pdf
  2. 2.0 2.1 Coronavirus: Detailed taxonomy. AVMA. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/AVMA-Detailed-Coronoavirus-Taxonomy-2020-02-03.pdf
  3. Liu, D. X., Liang, J. Q., & Fung, T. S. (2021, March 1). Human coronavirus-229e, -OC43, -NL63, and -HKU1 (coronaviridae). Encyclopedia of Virology. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204879/
  4. Lai, M. (2009, May 9). The making of infectious viral RNA: No size limit in sight. PNAS. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.97.10.5025
  5. 5.0 5.1 Cui, J., Li, F., & Shi, Z.-L. (2018, December 10). Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nature News. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-018-0118-9
  6. Liu, D. X., Liang, J. Q., & Fung, T. S. (2021, March 1). Human coronavirus-229e, -OC43, -NL63, and -HKU1 (coronaviridae). Encyclopedia of Virology. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204879/
  7. Kahn, J., & McIntosh, K. (2005, November). History and recent advances in coronavirus discovery: The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. LWW. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://journals.lww.com/pidj/Fulltext/2005/11001/History_and_Recent_Advances_in_Coronavirus.12.aspx
  8. Kahn, J., & McIntosh, K. (2005, November). History and recent advances in coronavirus discovery: The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. LWW. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://journals.lww.com/pidj/Fulltext/2005/11001/History_and_Recent_Advances_in_Coronavirus.12.aspx
  9. Rat, P., Oliver, E., & Dutot, M. (2020). SARS-COV-2 vs. SARS-COV-1 management: Antibiotics and inflammasome modulators potential. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from https://europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/7880-7885.pdf
  10. Chan-Yeung, M., & Rui-Heng Xu, R.-H. (2003, November 3). SARS: Epidemiology. Respirology (Carlton, Vic.). Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15018127/
  11. 11.0 11.1 Domingo, J. L. (2022, December). An updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-COV-2. Environmental research. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9420317/
  12. 12.0 12.1 Wang, W., McKinnie, S., Farhan, M., Paul, M., McDonald, T., McLean, B., Llorens-Cortes, C., Hazra, S., Murray, A., Vederas, J., & Audit, G. (2016, May). Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Metabolizes and Partially Inactivates Pyr-Apelin-13 and Apelin-17. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06892
  13. Tan, C. C. S., Lam, S. D., Richard, D., Owen, C. J., Berchtold, D., Orengo, C., Nair, M. S., Kuchipudi, S. V., Kapur, V., van Dorp, L., & Balloux, F. (2022, May 27). Transmission of SARS-COV-2 from humans to animals and potential host adaptation. Nature News. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-30698-6
  14. Rabaan, A., Al-Ahmed, S., Haque, S., Sah, R., Tiwari, R., Malik, Y., Yatoo, M., Bonilla-Aldana, D., & Rodriguez-Morales, A. (2020). SARS-COV-2, SARS-COV, and MERS-COV: A comparative overview. Le infezioni in medicina. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32275259/
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 15.6 15.7 15.8 Rabaan, A., Al-Ahmed, S., Haque, S., Sah, R., Tiwari, R., Malik, Y., Yatoo, M., Bonilla-Aldana, D., & Rodriguez-Morales, A. (2020). SARS-COV-2, SARS-COV, and MERS-COV: A comparative overview. Le infezioni in medicina. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32275259/
  16. Alimohamadi, Y., Tola, H., Abbasi-Ghahramanloo, A., Janani, M., & Sepandi, M. (2021). View of case fatality rate of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene. View of Case Fatality Rate of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.jpmh.org/index.php/jpmh/article/view/1627/871
  17. Mathieu, E., Ritchie, H., Rodés-Guirao, L., Appel, C., Giattino, C., Hasell, J., Macdonald, B., Dattani, S., Beltekian, D., Ortiz-Ospina, E., & Roser, M. (2020, March 5). Mortality risk of COVID-19. Our World in Data. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://ourworldindata.org/mortality-risk-covid
  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022, October). Clinical Presentation. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/clinical-care/clinical-considerations-presentation.html
  19. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). SCDHEC. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://scdhec.gov/middle-east-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-mers-cov
  20. Leung, N. H. L., Chu, D. K. W., Shiu, E. Y. C., Chan, K.-H., McDevitt, J. J., Hau, B. J. P., Yen, H.-L., Li, Y., Ip, D. K. M., Peiris, J. S. M., Seto, W.-H., Leung, G. M., Milton, D. K., & Cowling, B. J. (2020, April 3). Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nature News. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0843-2
  21. SARS| Frequently Asked Questions. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005, May 3). Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.cdc.gov/sars/about/faq.html
  22. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). SCDHEC. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://scdhec.gov/middle-east-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-mers-cov
  23. Abdelrahman, Z., Li, M., & Wang, X. (2020, August 24). Comparative review of SARS-COV-2, SARS-COV, MERS-COV, and influenza A respiratory viruses. Frontiers. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.552909/full
  24. Abu-Raddad, L., Chemaitelly, H., Ayoub, H., Yassine, H., Benslimane, F., Al Khatib, H., Tang, P., Hasan, M., Coyle, P., Al Mukdad, S., Kanaani, Z., Al Kuwari, E., Jermijenko, A., Kaleeckal, A., Latif, A., Shaik, R., Rahim, H., Nasrallah, G., Al Kuwari, M., Bertollini, R. (2021, August). Severity, criticality, and fatality of the SARS-CoV-2 Beta variant. medRxiv. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.02.21261465v1.full.pdf
  25. Lineages.org. Cov. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://cov-lineages.org/index.html#about
  26. Focosi, D., & Maggi, F. (2022, June 7). Recombination in Coronaviruses, with a focus on SARS-COV-2. Viruses. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228924/
  27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.4 27.5 27.6 27.7 Lineages.org. Cov. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://cov-lineages.org/index.html#about
  28. Katella, K. (2023, February 3). Omicron, Delta, Alpha, and more: What to know about the coronavirus variants. Yale Medicine. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-19-variants-of-concern-omicron
  29. 29.0 29.1 29.2 29.3 Focosi, D., & Maggi, F. (2022, June 7). Recombination in Coronaviruses, with a focus on SARS-COV-2. Viruses. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9228924/
  30. Stadtmüller, M., Laubner, A., Rost, F., Winkler, S., Patrasová, E., Šimůnková, L., Reinhardt, S., Beil, J., Dalpke, A. H., & Yi, B. (2022, February 14). Emergence and spread of a sub-lineage of SARS-COV-2 alpha variant B.1.1.7 in Europe, and with further evolution of Spike mutation accumulations shared with the beta and Gamma variants. Virus evolution. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048873/
  31. Farhud, D. D., & Mojahed, N. (2022, July). SARS-COV-2 notable mutations and variants: A review article. Iranian journal of public health. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529736/
  32. Tian, F., Tong, B., Sun, L., Shi, S., Zheng, B., Wang, Z., Dong, X., & Zheng, P. (2021, August 20). N501Y mutation of spike protein in SARS-COV-2 strengthens its binding to receptor ACE2. eLife. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://elifesciences.org/articles/69091
  33. Neil S;, L. M. J., Winstone H, Wilson, H., Dyer, A., Pickering, S., Galao, R., De Lorenzo, G., Cowton, V., Furnon, W., Suarez, N., Orton, R., Palmarini, M., Patel, A., Snell, L., Nebbia, G., Swanson, C., & Neil, S. (2022, November). The P681H mutation in the spike glycoprotein of the alpha variant of SARS-COV-2 escapes IFITM restriction and is necessary for type I interferon resistance. Journal of virology. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36350154/
  34. Bayarri-Olmos, R., Johnsen, L. B., Idorn, M., Reinert, L. S., Rosbjerg, A., Vang, S., Hansen, C. B., Helgstrand, C., Bjelke, J. R., Bak-Thomsen, T., Paludan, S. R., Garred, P., & Skjoedt, M.-O. (2021, November 25). The Alpha/B.1.1.7 SARS-COV-2 variant exhibits significantly higher affinity for ACE-2 and requires lower inoculation doses to cause disease in K18-Hace2 Mice. eLife. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://elifesciences.org/articles/70002
  35. 35.0 35.1 35.2 35.3 35.4 Farhud, D. D., & Mojahed, N. (2022, July). SARS-COV-2 notable mutations and variants: A review article. Iranian journal of public health. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529736/
  36. Stadtmüller, M., Laubner, A., Rost, F., Winkler, S., Patrasová, E., Šimůnková, L., Reinhardt, S., Beil, J., Dalpke, A. H., & Yi, B. (2022, February 14). Emergence and spread of a sub-lineage of SARS-COV-2 alpha variant B.1.1.7 in Europe, and with further evolution of Spike mutation accumulations shared with the beta and Gamma variants. Virus evolution. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048873/
  37. Tian, F., Tong, B., Sun, L., Shi, S., Zheng, B., Wang, Z., Dong, X., & Zheng, P. (2021, August 20). N501Y mutation of spike protein in SARS-COV-2 strengthens its binding to receptor ACE2. eLife. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://elifesciences.org/articles/69091
  38. Khan, A., Zia, T., Suleman, M., Khan, T., Ali, S. S., Abbasi, A. A., Mohammad, A., & Wei, D.-Q. (2021, October). Higher infectivity of the SARS-COV-2 new variants is associated with K417N/t, E484K, and n501y mutants: An Insight from structural data. Journal of cellular physiology. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251074/
  39. Tracking Variants. California Department of Public Health. (2023, April 13). Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/COVID-19/COVID-Variants.aspx
  40. Khan, A., Zia, T., Suleman, M., Khan, T., Ali, S. S., Abbasi, A. A., Mohammad, A., & Wei, D.-Q. (2021, October). Higher infectivity of the SARS-COV-2 new variants is associated with K417N/t, E484K, and n501y mutants: An Insight from structural data. Journal of cellular physiology. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251074/
  41. Grabowski, F., Preibisch, G. S. G., & Giziński , S. (2021, March). SARS-COV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 has about twofold replicative advantage and acquires concerning mutations. Viruses. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33804556/
  42. 42.0 42.1 42.2 42.3 Katella, K. (2023, February 3). Omicron, Delta, Alpha, and more: What to know about the coronavirus variants. Yale Medicine. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-19-variants-of-concern-omicron
  43. South, A., Chappell, M., & Diz, D. (2020, April). COVID-19, ACE2, and the cardiovascular consequences. American Journal of Physiology. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/ajpheart.00217.2020
  44. Starr, T., Greaney, A., Dingens, A., & Bloom, J. (2021, April 5). Complete map of SARS-COV-2 RBD mutations that escape the monoclonal antibody LY-Cov555 and its cocktail with Ly-cov016. Cell Reports Medicine. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666379121000719?via%3Dihub
  45. Tracking Variants. California Department of Public Health. (2023, April 13). Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/COVID-19/COVID-Variants.aspx
  46. MacMillan, C. (2021, November 17). Don't call it 'Delta plus'-and other things to know about the pandemic right now. Yale Medicine. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/dont-call-it-delta-plus
  47. Dhawan, M., Sharma, A., Priyanka, Thakur, N., Rajkhowa, T. K., & Choudhary, O. P. (2022, November 30). Delta variant (b.1.617.2) of SARS-COV-2: Mutations, impact, challenges and possible solutions. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359381/
  48. SARS-COV-2 variant classifications and definitions. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023, March). Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant-classifications.html
  49. SARS-COV-2 VARIANTS AND LINEAGES OF CONCERN. Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.bv-brc.org/view/VariantLineage/
  50. Katella, K. (2023, February 10). Omicron XBB.1.5 'Kraken' subvariant is on the rise: What to know. Yale Medicine. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/omicron-xbb-kraken-subvariant
  51. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Covid Data tracker. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions
  52. Understanding how covid-19 vaccines work. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023, February). Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/how-they-work.html?s_cid=11762%3Awhat+does+the+covid+vaccine+do%3Asem.ga%3Ap%3ARG%3AGM%3Agen%3APTN%3AFY22
  53. Mathieu, E., Ritchie, H., Rodés-Guirao, L., Appel, C., Giattino, C., Hasell, J., Macdonald, B., Dattani, S., Beltekian, D., Ortiz-Ospina, E., & Roser, M. (2020, March 5). Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccinations. Our World in Data. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
  54. Population. United Nations. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/population
  55. Sobhanie, M. (2021, December 14). How do virus mutations happen, and what do they mean? Ohio State Medical Center. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://wexnermedical.osu.edu/blog/virus-mutations-what-do-they-mean
  56. 56.0 56.1 Olena, A. (2021, September). Plenty of evidence for recombination in SARS-COV-2. The Scientist Magazine®. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/plenty-of-evidence-for-recombination-in-sars-cov-2-69156