Microbial corrosion: Difference between revisions

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
(Created page with "{{Uncurated}} ==Introduction== thumb|400px|right| The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phyllosphere phyllosphere refers to the above-groun...")
 
No edit summary
 
(42 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Uncurated}}
{{Uncurated}}
==Introduction==
==Introduction==
[[Image:Phyllosphere b gross.png|thumb|400px|right|]]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microorganism Microbial] corrosion is a form of biodeterioration and is frequently referred to as biocorrosion or microbially influenced corrosion (MIC)[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166904000631 ¹]. This degradative process primarily acts on metals, metalloids, minerals, and other rock-based materials. Aside from bacteria, fungi, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microphyte microalgae], and naturally occurring organic/inorganic chemicals contribute to biocorrosion.
 
 
The [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phyllosphere phyllosphere]] refers to the above-ground surfaces of a plant as a habitat for microorganisms, with a heavy emphasis on leaf surfaces. All plants are home to a wide variety of microorganism communities including bacteria, fungi, and yeasts. Some microorganisms benefit the plant, others are plant pathogens and can potentially damage or kill the host plant ([http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/filelibrary/5453/6558.PDF 4]). The majority of bacterial colonists on any given plant have no noticeable effect on plant growth or function.
 
Estimates suggest that the roughly 1 billion square kilometers of worldwide leaf surfaces host more than 10<sup>^26</sup> bacteria, which are the most abundant colonizers of this habitat.  Overall, microbiota in this ecosystem are large enough to have an impact on both global carbon and nitrogen cycles. Further more the phyllosphere mircroorganisms influence their hosts at the level of the individual plants.
 
With repeated and rapid constant change of environmental conditions occurring on leaf surfaces, the phyllosphere is recognized as a hostile environment to bacteria.  Leaf surfaces are often dry and temperatures can reach 40–55°C under intense sunlight. During the night, however, leaves are frequently wet with dew and at cool temperatures (5–10°C) ([http://www.pnas.org/content/106/38/16428.full 2]).
 
Microbes that live in the Phyllosphere are called [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiphyte Epiphytes]]


==Associated taxa==
==Associated taxa==
The leaf surface is exposed to rapidly changing temperature and relative humidity. Also the repeated alternation between presence and absence of moisture due to rain and dew ([http://www.iripz.pl/ftp/09_biotic.pdf 3]). The leaf also provides limited nutrient resources to bacterial colonists.  The rapid and severe changes in the physical conditions of the phyllosphere creates a hostile microbe environment.
Several factors may influence the microhabitat experienced by bacteria on leaves. First, the leaf itself is surrounded by a very thin laminar layer in which moisture emitted through stomata may be sequestered, alleviating the water that stress epiphytes ([http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/filelibrary/5453/6558.PDF 4]).
Second, some cells in a leaf bacterial population, particularly in [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_pathology plant-pathogenic]] populations locally invade the interior of the leaf, avoiding the stresses on the exterior of the leaf by residing in substomatal chambers or other interior locations.  While some phytopathogens have the option of avoiding stresses, most epiphytes must tolerate them in some way (Lindow, S).
[[Image:Leaf surface1.jpg|thumb|300px|right| "Under the microscope, aerial plant leaves resemble eerie landscapes, with deep gorges, tall peaks and gaping pits that riddle the waxy surface." -Leveau, J. (2009)]]
Epidermal cells produce hills and valleys that will determine the shape and size of low areas on the surface, which will influence the shape and spread of water droplets on the plant.  The first contact between immigrating bacteria and a leaf normally occurs at the plant cuticle. The waxy layer, which has different three-dimensional crystalline structures on different plant species and can change as leaves age.  These modifications limit passive diffusion of nutrients and water vapor from the plant's interior onto the surface and defines the hydrophobicity of the leaf. Thick waxy cuticles have thus been thought to interfere with bacterial colonization of plants by limiting diffusion of nutrients and inhibiting the wetting of the leaf surface (Lindow, S).


Because the Phyllosphere is a hostile environment for the residing microorganisms physical parameters contribute to stressful conditions, such as UV radiation, temperature shifts, and the presence of reactive oxygen species. Adaptation to stressful conditions was reflected by the detection of various proteins, assigned to diverse bacterial genera and detected in all analyzed samples. Among these proteins were superoxide dismutase, catalase, DNA protection proteins, chaperones, and proteins involved in the formation of the osmoprotectant trehalose ([http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/69/4/1875#F1 1]).
Many different bacterial genera are associated with MIC and are often categorized by  
their [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_respiration respiration] techniques.
Some common examples of these are:
: &bull;'''Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB)''', including [http://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/Desulfuromonas ''Desulfuromonas''] ''sp.'', ''Desulfobacter sp.'', and ''Desulfococcus sp.'', etc. The SRB are strictly anaerobic.[http://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=oDxEskKgx_0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=microbial+corrosion&ots=S7aY41Enuo&sig=709q2GtJ9Fo-AWDGsN-iip8XGBk%2523v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false%23v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false#v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false ²]
: &bull;'''Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria''', primarily of the genus ''Thiobacillus''. These organisms notably form sulfuric acid during [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redox oxidation], and are capable of both oxidizing sulfur and ferrous iron.[http://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=oDxEskKgx_0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=microbial+corrosion&ots=S7aY41Enuo&sig=709q2GtJ9Fo-AWDGsN-iip8XGBk%2523v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false%23v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false#v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false ²]
: &bull;'''“Iron” bacteria''', of which there are two types: ‘stalked’ (notably [http://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/Gallionella ''Gallionella] sp.'') and ‘filamentous’ (''Leptothrix sp.'', ''Clonothrix sp.'', ''Sphaerotilus sp.'', etc.). These bacteria primarily  oxidize or reduce iron species during respiration.[http://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=oDxEskKgx_0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=microbial+corrosion&ots=S7aY41Enuo&sig=709q2GtJ9Fo-AWDGsN-iip8XGBk%2523v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false%23v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false#v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false ²]
There are many other miscellaneous groups of bacteria that use or respire metallic substances and contribute to biocorrosion. Some [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudomonas ''Pseudomonas''] species can reduce iron, while other bacterial species can oxidize/reduce less abundant metals like manganese, palladium, nickel, etc. There are also biocorrosive bacteria that do not utilize metals but secrete organic acids which can break down surrounding materials.[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166904000631 ¹] [http://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=oDxEskKgx_0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=microbial+corrosion&ots=S7aY41Enuo&sig=709q2GtJ9Fo-AWDGsN-iip8XGBk%2523v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false%23v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false#v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false ²]  
It is important to note that not all species within a genus induce MIC and not all perform the same types of respiration.


==Mechanisms of action==
==Mechanisms of action==
There is evidence that bacteria form large and heterogeneous aggregates on plant surfaces. Microscopic examinations of colonized leaves show that plant surfaces have many epiphytes occuring on them in large mixed-bacterial-species aggregates that also harbor fungi. While large numbers of solitary bacterial cells occur on plants, a few large masses of apparently mixed bacterial species can be found.
Such aggregates can constitute between 30 and 80% of the total bacterial population on certain plant species. These assemblages, with an extent and structure similar to those of biofilms that develop in aquatic habitats, are probably found only on long-lived leaves in moist climates such as the tropics or wet temperate regions such as the Pacific Northwest.
The conglomerates on most other plants, while still sizable, are best known as aggregates. The formation of aggregates by bacteria on plants has major implications for the ability of these microbes to colonize and survive the harsh environment of the phyllosphere ([http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/69/4/1875#F1 1]); it may provide them with a means to modify their immediate environment in the habitat . The production of extracellular polysaccharide (EPS), which is considered to form a major part of the bacterial aggregate matrix, may benefit epiphytes in the phyllosphere
to see a photo of phyllospheric bacteria click the link [http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/69/4/1875/F1 microbial interactions]


Water availability is one of the most highly fluctuating factors on leaf surfaces. The heavy EPS slime within aggregates can shield the bacteria from desiccation stress by buffering the matric and osmotic potentials of their surroundings. Furthermore, EPS helps to protect plant-associated bacteria from reactive oxygen species, which are often encountered on plants. It has been demonstrated that aggregated bacteria resist oxidative stress better than planktonic bacteria ([http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/69/4/1875#F1 1]).
Despite a lot of experimentation and investigation into the detailed mechanisms of microbial corrosion, many elements of these processes are still unknown. In general, the process involves such mechanisms as: acidic degradation, electron movement, metal depolarization, polymerization and attachment of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biofilm biofilms], and mineral formation.[http://mic.sgmjournals.org/content/156/3/609.full.pdf+html ³]
===Biofilms===
[[file:2305sanifig4.jpg|300px|thumb|right|Bacterial biofilm on a metal substrate.[http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/article.asp?id=722&sub=sub1 ⁴]]] Biofilms are a primary tool used by bacteria to adhere to a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substrate_(biology) substrate’s] surface and facilitate metabolism/respiration optimization. In the case of MIC, biofilms are an essential part of the degradation process. Bacteria create biofilms by producing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extracellular_polymeric_substance extracellular polymeric substances] (EPS) such as lipids, polysaccharides, nucleic acids, and proteins. Fungal species can also create and reside within biofilms, and are often found within close vicinity of bacterial biofilms. The ability of a biofilm to bind to a metal substrate is dependent on the bonding affinity of the metallic ions and the anionic functional groups of the EPS’s.[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166904000631 ¹] Biofilms can be very diverse, and within one small area of biofilm, multiple species can be found and in very close proximity. Therefore, the actions of some species can affect the others. Scientific evidence suggests that within biofilms certain bacterial species might actually inhibit corrosion. Instead of physically blocking adhesion to the metal substrate, as originally hypothesized, the removal of nutrient sources and metabolites necessary for the functioning of other corrosive species has been observed.[http://www.corrosionjournal.org/doi/abs/10.5006/1.3277632?journalCode=corr ⁵] The close proximity of biofilms to metal substrates establishes [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_gradient electrochemical gradients] that allow the generation of free electron flow at anodic sites (site where metal is dissociated by bacteria).[http://mic.sgmjournals.org/content/156/3/609.full.pdf+html ³] The cathodic sites are found where oxygen is present and where the corrosion is visualized (rusting, fouling, etc).
===Chemical degradation===
[[File:Screen shot 2012-12-01 at 2.40.53 PM.jpg|250px|thumb|right|Some common redox reactions performed by metal-respiring bacteria.]] Microbes can either fully corrode substances or partially degrade them, the latter allowing the substance to be further broken down by other organisms or chemicals.
In most cases the microbes secrete [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoenzyme exoenzymes] that solubilize or dissimilate components of the substrate like complex compounds or large molecules. This action facilitates more rapid degradation of the substrate. Such enzymes include [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogenase hydrogenases], catalases, and oxioreductases, which are found within biofilm matrices or the surrounding environment. The complete biocorrosion of metals is the coupled action of exoenzyme secretion, causing initial degradation, followed by oxidation either by free oxygenic chemicals or microbial oxidation.[http://revistes.iec.cat/revistes224/index.php/IM/article/view/4c457c7ccc620.002 ⁶] Many of these chemicals secreted by the microbes that solubilize metals and are not degraded by the microbes are known as chelators.[http://mic.sgmjournals.org/content/156/3/609.full.pdf+html ³] Chelators are often coupled with ‘shuttle compounds’ that are reduced by the microbe with electrons from metabolic oxidation, which in turn reduce the metal ions of the substrate. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humic_acid Humic acids] are a major naturally-occurring group of chelators that include [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinone quinoids], such as 2,6-anthraquinone disulphonate (AQDS), and other acidic compounds.[http://www.geobacter.org/publication-files/Nature_1996_Aug.pdf ⁷]


==Microbial uses==
==Microbial uses==
Certain bacteria in the Phyllosphere can increase the saturation of leaves via production of compounds with surfactant properties. This ability occurred in 50% of the Pseudomonas strains tested. Because of the hydrophobic nature of the cuticle, it is likely that increased saturation of these habitats allows diffusion of substrates, making them more readily available to epiphytic bacteria (Lindow, S). Biosurfactants facilitate the moving of bacteria on the phylloplane, this phenomena was suggested for tolaasin, a toxin produced by Pseudomonas tolaasi. The water film created by the surfactant could spread the bacteria across the leaf surface to areas where nutrients are more abundant. The production of biosurfactants may be one trait which bacteria can alter their habitat to exploit it more efficiently ([http://www.iripz.pl/ftp/09_biotic.pdf 3]).
[[File:Screen shot 2012-12-01 at 2.46.54 PM.jpg|200px|thumb|right|A simple redox reaction cycle between iron-oxidizing and iron-reducing bacteria.]] Bacterial species that perform MIC and form biofilms on metallic substrates use metal ions as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_acceptor terminal electron acceptors] (TEA) during respiration. Metal respiring bacteria require extracellular reduction of metal compounds, often in a biofilm matrix, as they cannot uptake these compounds into the cell.[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17581116 ⁸] This is termed “dissimilatory metal reduction” because metals are used solely as TEA’s and cannot be incorporated into bacterial biomass.⁹ The use of chelators and shuttle compounds allows for free electrons to be released and subsequently used by the bacteria for respiration. Many fungi are also capable of metal reduction in order to gain access to substrate-bound electrons. Some bacteria, like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shewanella ''Shewanella] sp.'' use nanowires, which are electrically conductive filamentous appendages that transfer electrons directly to metal surfaces. The reductive processes used for respiration do not cause the physical corrosion that is observed on metal surfaces, but breaks down the metals allowing oxidation and visible corrosion. Most microbes that use metal substrates do so because their environments are nutrient poor, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaerobic anaerobic], or they have few other choices.
 
[[image:Bio_interatcions.gif‎|thumb|350px|right|
"Schematic diagram representing various hypothetical bacterial-habitat modifications in the phyllosphere, such as the release of nutrients from plant cells and bacterial cell dispersal effected by the production of syringomycin, which may act both as a phytotoxin and as a surfactant (A); the release of saccharides from the plant cell wall, caused by bacterial secretion of auxin (B); and protection from environmental stresses via production of EPS in bacterial aggregates(C)"
Communities in the phyllosphere are thought to be limited by carbon availability, and it may be expected that access to carbon compounds on leaves is a major determinant of epiphytic colonization. There is evidence that small amounts of nutrients, such as simple sugars (glucose, fructose, and sucrose) leach from the interior of the plant.]]
 
 
Communities in the phyllosphere are thought to be limited by carbon availability, and it may be expected that access to carbon compounds on leaves is a major determinant of epiphytic colonization. There is evidence that small amounts of nutrients, such as simple sugars (glucose, fructose, and sucrose) leach from the interior of the plant. ([http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/69/4/1875#F1 1]).


==Effects on materials==
==Effects on materials==
[[file:bottom-T-section.jpg|300px|thumb|left|Extensive microbial corrosion on an industrial pipeline.[http://corrosionlab.com/Failure-Analysis-Studies/30010.corrosion-bad-fitting.iron-sprinkler.htm ¹¹]]] Microbial corrosion plays a huge role in material degradation. It is a significant cause of corrosion of man-made structures, most notably underground pipelines. It is estimated that in North America and the United Kingdom, billions of dollars worth of damage to pipes, industrial machinery, sewer , etc., have been caused by microbial corrosion. Despite the use of preventative agents, like insulative casings, or more durable metals, such as stainless steel, to combat MIC, corrosion persisted in many cases.[http://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=oDxEskKgx_0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=microbial+corrosion&ots=S7aY41Enuo&sig=709q2GtJ9Fo-AWDGsN-iip8XGBk%2523v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false%23v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false#v=onepage&q=microbial%252520corrosion&f=false ²] Microbes perform MIC of not only metals but of rock, concrete, etc. Evidence has also shown extensive biocorrosion of caves, old monuments, and building foundations. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitting_corrosion Pitting], a localized form of corrosion causing small holes in the substrate, is typical visual evidence suggesting MIC.[http://www.yarbis.yildiz.edu.tr/web/userPubFiles/ynuhoglu_13181b35adc790eb467642bbd6bcb89d.pdf ¹⁰] In general, fungi tend to deteriorate materials like concrete, stone, and ceramic faster than bacteria. However, the two organisms are usually found simultaneously at biocorrosion sites. The coupling of their degradative properties is what causes extensive and rapid deterioration of materials.[http://mic.sgmjournals.org/content/156/3/609.full.pdf+html ³]


[[image:
==References==


==References==
1. Beech, I., Sunner, J. “Biocorrosion: Towards Understanding Interactions Between Biofilms and Metals.” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2004, DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio2004.05.001


(1) Lindow, S. Brandl, M. 2003. "Microbiology of the Phyllosphere." Applied and Environmental Microbiology. Vol. 69, No.4.
2. Iverson, W. “Microbial Corrosion of Metals.” Advances in Applied Microbiology, 1987, DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2164(08)70077-7
0099-2240


(2) Delmonte, N., Knief, C., Chaffron, S., 2009. "Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere." National Academy of Sciences.
3. Gadd, G. “Metals, Minerals and Microbes: Geomicrobiology and Bioremediation.” Microbiology, 2010, DOI:10.1099/mic.0.037143-0


(3) Machowicz-Stefaniak, Z., Krol, E. 2006. "Biotic effect of caraway phyllosphere fungi on the pathogenic fungus." Department of Plant Pathology
4. Stier, R. "SANITATION Beating Back Biofilms in Food Processin." Food Safety Magazine. The Target Group, Inc., Mar. 2005. Web. 01 Dec. 2012. <http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/article.asp?id=722>.
University of Life Science. 2-8


(4)Suslow, T. 2005. "Microbial Food Safety IS Your Responsibility." Vegetable Research Information Center. 1-6.  
5. Little, B., Ray, R. “A Pespective on Corrosion Inhibition by Biofilms.” Corrosion, 2002, DOI:10.5006/1.3277632


(5) Howplantswork. 2009. "Life in the Phyllosphere: What Microbes Commonly Dwell on the Surface of Leaves?.
6. Beech, I., Sunner, J., Hiraoka, K. “Microbe–surface Interactions in Biofouling and Biocorrosion Processes.” International Microbiology, 2005.


(6) Whipps, J.M. Hand, P. Pink, D. 2008. "Phyllosphere microbiology with special reference to diversity and plant genotype." 2-34
7. Lovely, D., Coates, J., Blunt-Harris, E., Phillips, E., Woodward, J. “Humic Substances as Electron Acceptors for Microbial Respiration.” Nature, 1996, DOI: 10.1038/382445a0


(7) Gardener, B., Frafel, D. 2002. "Biological Control of Plant Pathogens: Research, Commercialization, and Application in the USA." Plant Health Progress. 1-18
8. Liang, S., Squier, T., Zachara, J., Fredrickson, J. “Respiration of Metal (Hydr)oxides by Shewanella and Geobacter: a Key Role for Multihaem C-type Cytochromes.” Molecular Microbiology, 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05783.x


(8) Abell, G., Richter, A. 2008. "Nitrogen fixation by phyllosphere bacteria associated with higher plants and their colonizing epiphytes of a tropical lowland rainforest of Costa Rica." The IMSE journal. 2, 561–570
9. Willey, J., Sherwood, L., Woolverton, C. Prescott's Microbiology. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011. 534-535. Print.


Edited by student of Angela Kent at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
10. Nuhoglu, Y. “The Biodeteriorative of Microorganisms and the Effects on Stone Monuments Under Air Pollution and Continental-Cold Climatic Condition in Erzurum, Turkey.” Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 2004.


<!-- Do not edit or remove this line -->[[Category:Pages edited by students of Angela Kent at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]]
11. CTL-Corrosion of Iron Piping in a Fire Sprinkler System." Corrosion Testing Laboratories. N.p., 2007. Web. 01 Dec. 2012. <http://corrosionlab.com/Failure-Analysis-Studies/30010.corrosion-bad-fitting.iron-sprinkler.htm>.

Latest revision as of 08:58, 9 December 2012

This student page has not been curated.

Introduction

Microbial corrosion is a form of biodeterioration and is frequently referred to as biocorrosion or microbially influenced corrosion (MIC)¹. This degradative process primarily acts on metals, metalloids, minerals, and other rock-based materials. Aside from bacteria, fungi, microalgae, and naturally occurring organic/inorganic chemicals contribute to biocorrosion.

Associated taxa

Many different bacterial genera are associated with MIC and are often categorized by their respiration techniques. Some common examples of these are:

Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), including Desulfuromonas sp., Desulfobacter sp., and Desulfococcus sp., etc. The SRB are strictly anaerobic.²
Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, primarily of the genus Thiobacillus. These organisms notably form sulfuric acid during oxidation, and are capable of both oxidizing sulfur and ferrous iron.²
“Iron” bacteria, of which there are two types: ‘stalked’ (notably Gallionella sp.) and ‘filamentous’ (Leptothrix sp., Clonothrix sp., Sphaerotilus sp., etc.). These bacteria primarily oxidize or reduce iron species during respiration.²

There are many other miscellaneous groups of bacteria that use or respire metallic substances and contribute to biocorrosion. Some Pseudomonas species can reduce iron, while other bacterial species can oxidize/reduce less abundant metals like manganese, palladium, nickel, etc. There are also biocorrosive bacteria that do not utilize metals but secrete organic acids which can break down surrounding materials.¹ ² It is important to note that not all species within a genus induce MIC and not all perform the same types of respiration.

Mechanisms of action

Despite a lot of experimentation and investigation into the detailed mechanisms of microbial corrosion, many elements of these processes are still unknown. In general, the process involves such mechanisms as: acidic degradation, electron movement, metal depolarization, polymerization and attachment of biofilms, and mineral formation.³

Biofilms

Bacterial biofilm on a metal substrate.

Biofilms are a primary tool used by bacteria to adhere to a substrate’s surface and facilitate metabolism/respiration optimization. In the case of MIC, biofilms are an essential part of the degradation process. Bacteria create biofilms by producing extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) such as lipids, polysaccharides, nucleic acids, and proteins. Fungal species can also create and reside within biofilms, and are often found within close vicinity of bacterial biofilms. The ability of a biofilm to bind to a metal substrate is dependent on the bonding affinity of the metallic ions and the anionic functional groups of the EPS’s.¹ Biofilms can be very diverse, and within one small area of biofilm, multiple species can be found and in very close proximity. Therefore, the actions of some species can affect the others. Scientific evidence suggests that within biofilms certain bacterial species might actually inhibit corrosion. Instead of physically blocking adhesion to the metal substrate, as originally hypothesized, the removal of nutrient sources and metabolites necessary for the functioning of other corrosive species has been observed. The close proximity of biofilms to metal substrates establishes electrochemical gradients that allow the generation of free electron flow at anodic sites (site where metal is dissociated by bacteria).³ The cathodic sites are found where oxygen is present and where the corrosion is visualized (rusting, fouling, etc).

Chemical degradation

Some common redox reactions performed by metal-respiring bacteria.

Microbes can either fully corrode substances or partially degrade them, the latter allowing the substance to be further broken down by other organisms or chemicals.

In most cases the microbes secrete exoenzymes that solubilize or dissimilate components of the substrate like complex compounds or large molecules. This action facilitates more rapid degradation of the substrate. Such enzymes include hydrogenases, catalases, and oxioreductases, which are found within biofilm matrices or the surrounding environment. The complete biocorrosion of metals is the coupled action of exoenzyme secretion, causing initial degradation, followed by oxidation either by free oxygenic chemicals or microbial oxidation. Many of these chemicals secreted by the microbes that solubilize metals and are not degraded by the microbes are known as chelators.³ Chelators are often coupled with ‘shuttle compounds’ that are reduced by the microbe with electrons from metabolic oxidation, which in turn reduce the metal ions of the substrate. Humic acids are a major naturally-occurring group of chelators that include quinoids, such as 2,6-anthraquinone disulphonate (AQDS), and other acidic compounds.

Microbial uses

A simple redox reaction cycle between iron-oxidizing and iron-reducing bacteria.

Bacterial species that perform MIC and form biofilms on metallic substrates use metal ions as terminal electron acceptors (TEA) during respiration. Metal respiring bacteria require extracellular reduction of metal compounds, often in a biofilm matrix, as they cannot uptake these compounds into the cell. This is termed “dissimilatory metal reduction” because metals are used solely as TEA’s and cannot be incorporated into bacterial biomass.⁹ The use of chelators and shuttle compounds allows for free electrons to be released and subsequently used by the bacteria for respiration. Many fungi are also capable of metal reduction in order to gain access to substrate-bound electrons. Some bacteria, like Shewanella sp. use nanowires, which are electrically conductive filamentous appendages that transfer electrons directly to metal surfaces. The reductive processes used for respiration do not cause the physical corrosion that is observed on metal surfaces, but breaks down the metals allowing oxidation and visible corrosion. Most microbes that use metal substrates do so because their environments are nutrient poor, anaerobic, or they have few other choices.

Effects on materials

Extensive microbial corrosion on an industrial pipeline.¹¹

Microbial corrosion plays a huge role in material degradation. It is a significant cause of corrosion of man-made structures, most notably underground pipelines. It is estimated that in North America and the United Kingdom, billions of dollars worth of damage to pipes, industrial machinery, sewer , etc., have been caused by microbial corrosion. Despite the use of preventative agents, like insulative casings, or more durable metals, such as stainless steel, to combat MIC, corrosion persisted in many cases.² Microbes perform MIC of not only metals but of rock, concrete, etc. Evidence has also shown extensive biocorrosion of caves, old monuments, and building foundations. Pitting, a localized form of corrosion causing small holes in the substrate, is typical visual evidence suggesting MIC.¹⁰ In general, fungi tend to deteriorate materials like concrete, stone, and ceramic faster than bacteria. However, the two organisms are usually found simultaneously at biocorrosion sites. The coupling of their degradative properties is what causes extensive and rapid deterioration of materials.³

References

1. Beech, I., Sunner, J. “Biocorrosion: Towards Understanding Interactions Between Biofilms and Metals.” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2004, DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio2004.05.001

2. Iverson, W. “Microbial Corrosion of Metals.” Advances in Applied Microbiology, 1987, DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2164(08)70077-7

3. Gadd, G. “Metals, Minerals and Microbes: Geomicrobiology and Bioremediation.” Microbiology, 2010, DOI:10.1099/mic.0.037143-0

4. Stier, R. "SANITATION Beating Back Biofilms in Food Processin." Food Safety Magazine. The Target Group, Inc., Mar. 2005. Web. 01 Dec. 2012. <http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/article.asp?id=722>.

5. Little, B., Ray, R. “A Pespective on Corrosion Inhibition by Biofilms.” Corrosion, 2002, DOI:10.5006/1.3277632

6. Beech, I., Sunner, J., Hiraoka, K. “Microbe–surface Interactions in Biofouling and Biocorrosion Processes.” International Microbiology, 2005.

7. Lovely, D., Coates, J., Blunt-Harris, E., Phillips, E., Woodward, J. “Humic Substances as Electron Acceptors for Microbial Respiration.” Nature, 1996, DOI: 10.1038/382445a0

8. Liang, S., Squier, T., Zachara, J., Fredrickson, J. “Respiration of Metal (Hydr)oxides by Shewanella and Geobacter: a Key Role for Multihaem C-type Cytochromes.” Molecular Microbiology, 2007, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05783.x

9. Willey, J., Sherwood, L., Woolverton, C. Prescott's Microbiology. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011. 534-535. Print.

10. Nuhoglu, Y. “The Biodeteriorative of Microorganisms and the Effects on Stone Monuments Under Air Pollution and Continental-Cold Climatic Condition in Erzurum, Turkey.” Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 2004.

11. CTL-Corrosion of Iron Piping in a Fire Sprinkler System." Corrosion Testing Laboratories. N.p., 2007. Web. 01 Dec. 2012. <http://corrosionlab.com/Failure-Analysis-Studies/30010.corrosion-bad-fitting.iron-sprinkler.htm>.