Potyvirus
1. Classification
a. Higher order taxa
Viruses; Riboviria; Orthornavirae; Pisuviricota; Stelpaviricetes; Patatavirales; Potyviridae [1]
2. Description and significance
Potyvirus is a genus of plant virus within the family Potyviridae and is one of the greatest culprits of crop infestation across the entire globe [2]. The word “Poty” derives from the abbreviation of Potato virus Y, which is one of the most well-known species within the genus Potyvirus. The original discovery of Potyvirus can be traced to 7,250 years ago in Southwest Eurasia or North Africa where it diverged from another plant virus of monocotyledons [3]. Potyvirus contains 167 pathogenic species that infect plants, including monocotyledons and dicotyledons [3][7]. The symptoms of the viruses vary, but consist mostly of mosaic symptoms, in which the leaves of the plant are irregularly mottled with different colored streaks or patches, and also leaf malformation. The virulence of Potyvirus ranges from no symptoms to plant death depending on its species and the viral variant [4]. Potyvirus is commonly transmitted via aphids, though some can also be transmitted via seeds, yet the factors that contribute to aphids’ high adaptability are poorly understood [2][8]. Potyvirus can cause a widespread negative impact on the entire agricultural system [4].
3. Genome structure
Currently, only 47 species of Potyvirus have not yet been sequenced. Across all 120 sequenced Potyvirus genomes, most consist of a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA that varies from 9,300 to 10,800nt in length with an average length of 9,799nt [8]. Potyvirus RNA consists of 41.95% G + C nucleotides and encodes 3,125 amino acids, which in turn encodes for a single polyprotein. Some fungal-transmitted Potyviruses have two strands of RNA [9]. 96% of the Potyvirus RNA is the coding region, with only the 3’ poly-A tail being the non-coding segment of the RNA [10]. Using genetic mapping, 48 of the 120 organisms in the genus Potyvirus exhibit higher polyprotein variation that is statistically significant, with the highest genomic variation expressed in the nuclear inclusion protein NIa-protease (NIa-pro) protein-coding region [8].
4. Cell structure
The Potyvirus particle is a long non-enveloped filament that is 680 to 900nm long and 11-20nm wide [11]. The capsin encapsulates a single strand RNA with non-translated 5’-terminal region and 3’-poly-A tail [11][12]. The structure of the virion consists of 10 protein segments: P1-Pro, HC-Pro, P3, CI, NIa, NIb, 6K1, P3N-PIPO, CP, and VPg. The viral protein genome-linked protein (VPg) is located at the 5’ end of the Potyvirus genome [13][14][15]. This VPg is a multifunctional protein that has a role in viral replication and movement [16]. Downstream of VPg, a polyprotein covers the entire open reading frame of the RNA [18][19]. This polyprotein can be cleaved by proteases to form 10 functional and structural proteins. The first protein (P1-pro) is a serine protease that breaks down the polyprotein [20]. The helper component protein (HC-pro) is involved in aphid transmission, transcription initiation in the host cells, and viral RNA silencing suppression [21]. Not much is known about the third protein (P3), but it plays an important role when interacting with the P3N-PIPO movement protein [22]. The cylindrical inclusion protein (CI) is involved in viral replication and cell-to-cell movement, via the formation of conical structures and the interaction with the coat protein [23]. The small nuclear inclusion protein NIa-protease (NIa-pro) is responsible for cleaving the viral polyprotein into functional proteins [24]. The large nuclear inclusion protein NIb-RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (NIb-RdRp) is the center protein for RNA replicase. NIb recruits several host proteins into viral replication complexes (VRCs) [25]. The 6K1 protein, which locates at the 6 kDa position, is known to be a component of the VRC, but function by itself is unknown [26]. The function of the movement protein, P3N-PIPO, is also unknown but has been shown to be required for cell-to-cell movement [22]. The coat protein (CP) is a protein critical for encapsidation, aphid transmission, viral replication, and cell-to-cell movement [27].
5. Metabolic processes
The Potyvirus enters the host cell via two methods: outside infection, via aphid transmission, and neighboring cell infection, via cell-to-cell movement from an infected cell to its neighboring cell [28]. The viral protein genome-linked protein (VPg) is required to sufficiently transfer the virus RNA of the Potyvirus to enter into the host cell translational machinery without being degraded [29]. Upon entering the host cell, Potyvirus’ polyprotein structure disassembles and releases the genomic RNA, which undergoes translation by the host ribosome and produces a single polyprotein. The polyprotein will then be cleaved by proteases into ten functional proteins to further hijack the host metabolism [30].
6. Ecology
There are 167 species of Potyvirus distributed around the world [8]. The US currently has 81 species of the virus, with China having 63, Australia having 62, and France having 49 [5]. Each species of Potyvirus targets a specific range of plant hosts. These hosts can range from domesticated crops such as potatoes or tobacco, targeted by Potato virus Y, to wild plants such as Conium maculatum and Ruta montana, targeted by Poison hemlock virus Y and Mediterranean ruda virus, respectively, though the majority of infestations are still found in agricultural crops [41][42][43].
Potyvirus can be transmitted through more than 200 species of aphids [5]. The transmission is in a non-persistent manner, indicating the virus only resides within the insect vectors (insect stylets) for a short period of time relative to persistent transmission [6]. Although there are over 200 known species of aphids involved in this transmission process, the majority of the Potyvirus species are transmitted by only a few species of aphids. These few aphid species are mostly polyphagous, meaning they feed on various families of plants [5]. Their wide range of food sources explain why they have a greater range of transmission than monophagous aphids that feed on only one genus or family of plants. For example, M. persicae, which is polyphagous, is responsible for transmitting 53.4% of all the Potyvirus species while L. erysimi, which is monophagous, transmits only 4.5% of the species [5]. Nevertheless, monophagous aphid species are still capable of having high transmission efficiency regardless of transmission range. For instance, M. persicae is more efficient at transmitting Potato Virus Y to Capsicum annuum, whereas L. erysimi is more efficient at transmitting Turnip mosaic virus to B. rapa [5].
7. Pathology and Epidemiology
Potyvirus is a widespread plant virus responsible for a significant portion of crop losses among the agricultural industry [2]. Aphids act as vectors that transport the viral RNA of Potyviruses from one plant to another. Aphids can acquire the virion within seconds or minutes [5]. Once the virion is acquired, the aphid retains it transiently, during which it can pass on the virion to other nearby host plants [5].
Common phenotypic symptoms of Potyvirus include stunted growth, reduction in tuberous root, and leaf deformation (or mosaics) [44][45]. These symptoms, if left untreated, can result in significant crop loss, as highlighted by the past pandemic of the Sweet potato feathery mottle virus in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The crop loss became so devastating that the entire agricultural industry of sweet potatoes ceased to exist for a period of time due to its unprofitability [45]. Many current countermeasures have hitherto shown to be effective in targeting both Potyvirus and the aphids. For example, selective breeding of viral-resistant crops, amputation of infected plant bodies, or the removal of the entire infected host plant are all effective in stopping the spread of Potato virus Y, Plum pox virus, and Lettuce mosaic virus [5]. On the other hand, the use of physical barriers, mineral oil spraying, and reflective mulches have proven to be effective in repelling aphids. But given the complexity in the transmission and the infection of the virus, the strategy of integrating multiple countermeasures together is often required to effectively mitigate the damage of widespread crop infection [5].
8. Current Research
Due to the substantial economic loss caused by the Potyvirus, the emergence of improved antiviral strategies against Potyvirus infection is essential. One recent research has put focus on the identification of conserved miRNAs within the host plants [46]. The use of miRNAs based antiviral resistance strategies has been successfully applied against the animal virus but not on plant viruses. The miR168 and miR162 genes were found to be conserved in many plants, which can potentially be used to help design broad-spectrum antiviral strategies [46].
Thermotherapy and chemotherapy were also considered for plant virus elimination but studies showed these therapies alone are not efficient in viral elimination due to the low surviving rate and reproduction rate. A recent study explores the possible combination of thermotherapy and explant size in hope to improve the efficiency of eliminating Potyvirus and Carlavirus from infected shallot in Indonesia [47]. The results show that the frequency of viral infection is lowered when explant size at 37 °C is decreased. Although the elimination efficiency does show signs of improvements, the reproduction rate was not meeting the expectancy and more research can be conducted for future improvement [47].
Future directions of Potyvirus study include the multi-omics approaches such as RNAi and CRISPR-based gene editing. These techniques are used to develop efficient and sustainable virus vector management strategies. RNAi plays a role in plant virus defense by degrading target RNA molecules at transcriptional or post-transcriptional levels [9]. A recent study found that dsRNAs targeting NIb or CP protect N. benthamiana (relative of tobacco) and cowpea plants from aphid-mediated transmission [48]. This study provides the possibility of using RNAi for crop protection. CRISPR gene editing can be used to develop tools that genetically modify vectores’ transmission cycle to achieve plant genetic improvement and protection within short times. A recent study has successfully applied CRISPR/Cas13a as the tool to trigger TuMV resistance in N. benthamiana with specific virus interference that knocks down the HC-Pro protein to block the aphid transmission of Potyviruses [49].
9. References
It is required that you add at least five primary research articles (in same format as the sample reference below) that corresponds to the info that you added to this page. [Sample reference] Faller, A., and Schleifer, K. "Modified Oxidase and Benzidine Tests for Separation of Staphylococci from Micrococci". Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1981. Volume 13. p. 1031-1035.
