Calcium signaling in plant-microbe interaction: Difference between revisions

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Introduction==
==Introduction==
Calcium ion (Ca<sup>2+</sup>) is an important second messenger involved in many signaling pathways in plants.<ref>[https://academic.oup.com/plcell/article/14/suppl_1/S401/6009910?login=true Sanders et al. “Calcium at the Crossroads of Signaling” 2002. The Plant Cell 14:401–S417.]</ref> The intracellular concentration of Ca<sup>2+</sup> connects the extracellular stimuli, including the signal of microbes, to intracellular and allow the respond in plants. Since Ca<sup>2+</sup> cannot be synthesized or degraded by plant, its concentration in the cytoplasm of a plant cell ([Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub>) is completely dependent on the balance of its entry and efflux process.<ref>[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.4161/psb.4.11.9800 Vadassery, J. and Oelmüller, R. “Calcium signaling in pathogenic and beneficial plant microbe interactions” 2009. Plant Signaling & Behavior 4:1024-1027.]</ref> The concentration is regulated tightly by various membrane proteins, such as Ca<sup>2+</sup> permeable channels, transporters, and Ca<sup>2+</sup> pumps.<ref>[https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.13031 Seybold et al. “Ca<sup>2+</sup> signalling in plant immune response: from pattern recognition receptors to Ca2+ decoding mechanisms” 2014. New Phytologist 204: 782-790.]</ref> Different microbe signals trigger distinctive Ca<sup>2+</sup> elevation patterns, referred to as Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature, that can be different from each other from various aspects: amplitude, duration, frequency, spatial distribution, and times of cycle in [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub> changes. The Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature produced by microbe signal can be decoded by downstream effectors and will result in transcriptional reprogramming of the defense or symbiosis-related genes by the transcription factors, causing different responses by plants.<ref>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369526617300304#bib0600 Yuan et al. “Calcium signatures and signaling events orchestrate plant–microbe interactions” 2017. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 38:173-183.]</ref><br>
 
Calcium ion (Ca<sup>2+</sup>) is an important second messenger involved in many signaling pathways in plants.<ref>[https://academic.oup.com/plcell/article/14/suppl_1/S401/6009910?login=true Sanders et al. “Calcium at the Crossroads of Signaling” 2002. The Plant Cell 14:401–S417.]</ref> The intracellular concentration of Ca<sup>2+</sup> connects the extracellular stimuli, including the signal of microbes, to intracellular and allow the respond in plants. Since Ca<sup>2+</sup> cannot be synthesized or degraded by plant, its concentration in the cytoplasm of a plant cell ([Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub>) is completely dependent on the entry of external source or release of Ca<sup>2+</sup> from its intracellular stores.<ref>[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.4161/psb.4.11.9800 Vadassery, J. and Oelmüller, R. “Calcium signaling in pathogenic and beneficial plant microbe interactions” 2009. Plant Signaling & Behavior 4:1024-1027.]</ref> The concentration is regulated tightly by various membrane proteins, such as Ca<sup>2+</sup> permeable channels, transporters, and Ca<sup>2+</sup> pumps.<ref>[https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.13031 Seybold et al. “Ca<sup>2+</sup> signalling in plant immune response: from pattern recognition receptors to Ca2+ decoding mechanisms” 2014. New Phytologist 204: 782-790.]</ref> Different microbe signals trigger distinctive Ca<sup>2+</sup> elevation patterns, referred to as Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature, that can be different from each other from various aspects: amplitude, duration, frequency, spatial distribution, and times of cycle in [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub> changes. The Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature produced by microbe signal can be decoded by downstream effectors and will result in transcriptional reprogramming of the defense or symbiosis-related genes by the transcription factors, causing different responses by plants.<ref>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369526617300304#bib0600 Yuan et al. “Calcium signatures and signaling events orchestrate plant–microbe interactions” 2017. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 38:173-183.]</ref><br>


==Detection of Microbes==
==Detection of Microbes==
<br>


==Formation of Calcium Signature==
The detection of microbes by pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), a type of receptor protein located on the plasma membrane of a plant cell, is the first step of a Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling event. PRRs are capable of recognizing microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs), molecules specific to microbes, as well as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), molecules released by damaged or dying cells of self. <br>
<br>
 
Flagellin-sensitive 2 (FLS2) is an example of PRRs that recognize MAMPs of pathogenic microbes in plants. It recognizes the flagellin protein in bacteria flagellum. Another example is LysM-receptor kinase 5 (LYK5) and chitin elicitor receptor kinase 1 (CERK1) receptor complex, which recognize chitin in the cell wall of fungi. <br>
 
MAMPs of symbiotic microbes are also detected by PRRs. Rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi releases Nod factors and Myc factors, and the molecules in them, for example, lipochitooligosaccharides, are recognized by PRRs such as Nod factor perception (NFP), LysM receptor kinase 3/4 (LYK3/4), and symbiosis receptor kinase (DMI2). <br>
 
DAMPs, which are resulted from pathogen attacks, signifies the present of pathogens and are also recognized by PRRs, including plant endogenous peptide 1 receptor 1 (PEPR1) and PEPR2, and trigger the formation of a Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature. <br>
 
==Formation of Ca<sup>2+</sup> Signature==
 
After a PRR’s detection of microbes, it triggers an influx of Ca<sup>2+</sup> ion from outside the cell, resulting in a unique Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature. The activated PRRs can either trigger the entry of Ca<sup>2+</sup> by itself or by activating downstream receptor. If PRRs trigger the influx by itself, there are two possibilities. The first possibility is that it can form a complex with the Ca<sup>2+</sup> ion channels on the membrane physically and regulate the activity of the channels. The alternative is to produce a signaling molecule binds to Ca<sup>2+</sup> permeable channels or Ca<sup>2+</sup> pumps and activate them. The other mechanism is to activate a downstream receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases (RLCKs). The RLCKs then provoke the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. The ROS interact with Ca<sup>2+</sup> channels and cause the rise in [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub>. <br>
 
==Decoding of Ca<sup>2+</sup> Signature==
 
Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature is decoded by Ca<sup>2+</sup> sensor proteins. There are various types of sensor proteins in plants, and they respond to the rise in [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub> in two different ways. The first possibility is that Ca<sup>2+</sup> binds to sensor proteins such as Calmodulin (CaM) and CaM-like proteins (CMLs) and change their structures, enabling them to bind to their targets. They then bind to calcineurin b-like proteins (CBLs). CBLs interact with CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs), an enzyme. The second possible way a sensor can decode the Ca<sup>2+</sup> Signature is that the sensor has a kinase domain of its own and can phosphorylate other molecules directly. An example of this type of sensor is Ca<sup>2+</sup>-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs or CPKs). <br>
 
This can cause changes in both transcriptional and post-transcriptional level. At post-transcriptional level, the phosphorylation events by CIPKs, CDPKs or CPKs activate NADPH oxidase in the cell membrane and leads to an increase in the level of ROS production. The ROS produced act as a signaling molecule to promote the influx of Ca<sup>2+</sup>, forming a positive-feedback loop, although its mechanism is not yet known. At transcriptional level, Ca<sup>2+</sup>-modified CaM can bind to transcription factors that promote the transcription of gene related to plant immunity, for example, the gene for synthesize of salicylic acid in plants, causing the whole plant to be ready for pathogen attack.<br>
 
==Ca<sup>2+</sup> signal as a negative regulator==
 
Although Ca<sup>2+</sup>have been evolved to be utilized as a ubiquitous secondary messenger in plants, it is, by its nature, still a toxin, and long term exposure to high Ca<sup>2+</sup> level can eventually leads to harm to plant cells, even cell death. So, Ca<sup>2+</sup> ions cannot keep being present in the cytoplasm. In fact, Ca<sup>2+</sup> signal can also act as a negative regulator that down regulates the influx of Ca<sup>2+</sup>. It can down regulate it from two processes: formation and decoding of Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature.
 
In the formation of Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature, some CPKs can bind to BIK1, phosphorylate it, thus promoting its degradation and preventing it from


==Decoding of Calcium Signature==
<br>
<br>



Revision as of 05:40, 2 December 2021

Introduction

Calcium ion (Ca2+) is an important second messenger involved in many signaling pathways in plants.[1] The intracellular concentration of Ca2+ connects the extracellular stimuli, including the signal of microbes, to intracellular and allow the respond in plants. Since Ca2+ cannot be synthesized or degraded by plant, its concentration in the cytoplasm of a plant cell ([Ca2+]cyt) is completely dependent on the entry of external source or release of Ca2+ from its intracellular stores.[2] The concentration is regulated tightly by various membrane proteins, such as Ca2+ permeable channels, transporters, and Ca2+ pumps.[3] Different microbe signals trigger distinctive Ca2+ elevation patterns, referred to as Ca2+ signature, that can be different from each other from various aspects: amplitude, duration, frequency, spatial distribution, and times of cycle in [Ca2+]cyt changes. The Ca2+ signature produced by microbe signal can be decoded by downstream effectors and will result in transcriptional reprogramming of the defense or symbiosis-related genes by the transcription factors, causing different responses by plants.[4]

Detection of Microbes

The detection of microbes by pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), a type of receptor protein located on the plasma membrane of a plant cell, is the first step of a Ca2+ signaling event. PRRs are capable of recognizing microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs), molecules specific to microbes, as well as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), molecules released by damaged or dying cells of self.

Flagellin-sensitive 2 (FLS2) is an example of PRRs that recognize MAMPs of pathogenic microbes in plants. It recognizes the flagellin protein in bacteria flagellum. Another example is LysM-receptor kinase 5 (LYK5) and chitin elicitor receptor kinase 1 (CERK1) receptor complex, which recognize chitin in the cell wall of fungi.

MAMPs of symbiotic microbes are also detected by PRRs. Rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi releases Nod factors and Myc factors, and the molecules in them, for example, lipochitooligosaccharides, are recognized by PRRs such as Nod factor perception (NFP), LysM receptor kinase 3/4 (LYK3/4), and symbiosis receptor kinase (DMI2).

DAMPs, which are resulted from pathogen attacks, signifies the present of pathogens and are also recognized by PRRs, including plant endogenous peptide 1 receptor 1 (PEPR1) and PEPR2, and trigger the formation of a Ca2+ signature.

Formation of Ca2+ Signature

After a PRR’s detection of microbes, it triggers an influx of Ca2+ ion from outside the cell, resulting in a unique Ca2+ signature. The activated PRRs can either trigger the entry of Ca2+ by itself or by activating downstream receptor. If PRRs trigger the influx by itself, there are two possibilities. The first possibility is that it can form a complex with the Ca2+ ion channels on the membrane physically and regulate the activity of the channels. The alternative is to produce a signaling molecule binds to Ca2+ permeable channels or Ca2+ pumps and activate them. The other mechanism is to activate a downstream receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases (RLCKs). The RLCKs then provoke the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as H2O2. The ROS interact with Ca2+ channels and cause the rise in [Ca2+]cyt.

Decoding of Ca2+ Signature

Ca2+ signature is decoded by Ca2+ sensor proteins. There are various types of sensor proteins in plants, and they respond to the rise in [Ca2+]cyt in two different ways. The first possibility is that Ca2+ binds to sensor proteins such as Calmodulin (CaM) and CaM-like proteins (CMLs) and change their structures, enabling them to bind to their targets. They then bind to calcineurin b-like proteins (CBLs). CBLs interact with CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs), an enzyme. The second possible way a sensor can decode the Ca2+ Signature is that the sensor has a kinase domain of its own and can phosphorylate other molecules directly. An example of this type of sensor is Ca2+-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs or CPKs).

This can cause changes in both transcriptional and post-transcriptional level. At post-transcriptional level, the phosphorylation events by CIPKs, CDPKs or CPKs activate NADPH oxidase in the cell membrane and leads to an increase in the level of ROS production. The ROS produced act as a signaling molecule to promote the influx of Ca2+, forming a positive-feedback loop, although its mechanism is not yet known. At transcriptional level, Ca2+-modified CaM can bind to transcription factors that promote the transcription of gene related to plant immunity, for example, the gene for synthesize of salicylic acid in plants, causing the whole plant to be ready for pathogen attack.

Ca2+ signal as a negative regulator

Although Ca2+have been evolved to be utilized as a ubiquitous secondary messenger in plants, it is, by its nature, still a toxin, and long term exposure to high Ca2+ level can eventually leads to harm to plant cells, even cell death. So, Ca2+ ions cannot keep being present in the cytoplasm. In fact, Ca2+ signal can also act as a negative regulator that down regulates the influx of Ca2+. It can down regulate it from two processes: formation and decoding of Ca2+ signature.

In the formation of Ca2+ signature, some CPKs can bind to BIK1, phosphorylate it, thus promoting its degradation and preventing it from


Conclusion


References


Edited by Yueqi Song, student of Joan Slonczewski for BIOL 116 Information in Living Systems, 2021, Kenyon College.