Talk:Adeno-Associated Viruses as Gene Therapy Vectors: Difference between revisions

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


Great topic and great job!
Great topic and great job!
==Julia DeNiro's comments==
I agree with the comment above that this page is extremely interesting.  I could understand it reasonably well without a background in virology, but then again, I can understand information about genetics.  I also agree that you should put your citations in the text more often--by putting names and dates, like (Slonczewski <i>et al</i> 2005) or by linking with numbers.  I know Dr. S suggested with my page that I provide hyperlinks on my figures and also put references to them in the text, and I think it would be very helpful, since we could connect the figures with your text better.

Revision as of 02:25, 23 April 2009

Khalid Eldahan's Comments

I think this topic is not only interesting, but medically very exciting. I think this treatment has potential.

One thing I feel that you should incorporate more into your paper is the life cycle and replication of Adeno-Associated Viruses. This is critical for a thorough understanding of how the vectors are incorporated into host DNA. You give some details of the life cycle here and there throughout your paper, but consider making a section explicitly on the life cycle.

A structural feature of your paper that I thought was excellent is the division of therapeutic applications. You cover treatment of glioblastoma multiforme, cycstic fibrosis, and parkinson's disease. This shows that gene therapy vectors could be used to battle such serious and relatively common diseases.

A complete understanding of all the awesome information on your page would require a general background in virology. Although all of the information you've included is accessible to us based on what we've learned in Microbiology lecture, consider ways to make the material accessible to people with other scientific backgrounds. I wouldn't recommend targeting a non-scientific audience with such a complex topic, but think about having a more general audience when you're discussing the research.

One last thing to include before your page is final: Place your citations in the text more often. You seem to have some pretty solid references, just be sure to give credit to them in the actual text.

Great topic and great job!

Julia DeNiro's comments

I agree with the comment above that this page is extremely interesting. I could understand it reasonably well without a background in virology, but then again, I can understand information about genetics. I also agree that you should put your citations in the text more often--by putting names and dates, like (Slonczewski et al 2005) or by linking with numbers. I know Dr. S suggested with my page that I provide hyperlinks on my figures and also put references to them in the text, and I think it would be very helpful, since we could connect the figures with your text better.