Talk:Microbial Mythology: Difference between revisions
From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
Slonczewski (talk | contribs) (New page: The question of microbial fossils is very interesting. Unfortunately, Schopf's early fossils are controversial in interpretation. However, many microfossils are now well documented. A g...) |
Slonczewski (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The question of microbial fossils is very interesting. Unfortunately, Schopf's early fossils are controversial in interpretation. However, many microfossils are now well documented. A good general reference is Andrew Knoll's book <i>Life on a Young Planet: The First Three Billion Years of Evolution on Earth</i>. Also, the question of microfossil documentation is discussed in Chapter 17 of Slonczewski & Foster, <i>Microbiology: An Evolving Science</i> | The question of microbial fossils is very interesting. Unfortunately, Schopf's early fossils are controversial in interpretation. However, many microfossils are now well documented. A good general reference is Andrew Knoll's book <i>Life on a Young Planet: The First Three Billion Years of Evolution on Earth</i>. Also, the question of microfossil documentation is discussed in Chapter 17 of Slonczewski & Foster, <i>Microbiology: An Evolving Science</i>. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:14, 29 April 2013
The question of microbial fossils is very interesting. Unfortunately, Schopf's early fossils are controversial in interpretation. However, many microfossils are now well documented. A good general reference is Andrew Knoll's book Life on a Young Planet: The First Three Billion Years of Evolution on Earth. Also, the question of microfossil documentation is discussed in Chapter 17 of Slonczewski & Foster, Microbiology: An Evolving Science.
