African Sleeping Sickness: Trypanosome Invasion Mechanism

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
Jump to: navigation, search
This is a curated page. Report corrections to Microbewiki.


Fig. 1 - The insect vector of the trypanosome microbe, the tsetse fly. These flies are found in tropical parts of Southern Africa and are the only known vector for African Sleeping Sickness [1].

By Katie Lensmeyer

African Sleeping Sickness (Trypanosome brucei gambiense) is a microbial vector driven disease that affects many parts of Africa. The disease takes action by first invading the peripheral nervous system of its host, and soon after passes the blood brain barrier to complete more neurological damage. [2] The result of this infection is fatal to the mammalian host. From initial infection to death of the host system, this microbe needs only a few short months to become fatal. How is it that this disease can invade such secure parts of the human system so quickly? The human immune system seems to be far too advanced to let this microbe produce the effects that it does. Recent research looks deeply into both the spread of the infection through the mammalian host as well as the growth of the microbe within its vector, the tsetse fly.

The relationship between the tsetse fly and T. brucei is that of an obligate parasite, meaning the cell needs a host cell in order to function. Once transmitted from the tsetse fly to a mammal, the microbe becomes pathogenic. Unsurprisingly, across the 36 African countries that it is found in, the tsetse fly is known to carry a variety of trypanosomiasis infections. The tsetse fly is immune to all of the trypanosome diseases that they transmit. This protection comes down to their lack of hemolymph within their blood. Their nutrient availability can not provide the microbe with the nourishment needed for the trypanosome cells to replicate into their pathogenic form. The cell does however have a mild effect on its fly host in the way that any normal parasite-host relationship would. [1]

Fig. 2 - The countries highlighted in red display the many locations in Sub-Saharan Africa that have been found to carry sleeping sickness. Across the thirty-six countries in total, there is a large variation in the severity of the disease outbreaks.[2].

Phylogenetic reconstruction of this disease has shown that this disease has existed for approximately 300 million years. The microbial coexistence with its insect parasite has existed for equally as long.[1] This ancient coexistence between African mammals and their blood-sucking insect counterparts is assumed to be why most native Animalia are not affected by the disease. This immunity, however, does not stretch to the domesticated animals of the area. [1] Trypanosoma brucei, the form of trypanosomes that causes sleeping sickness, is expected to be a recent development within history of trypanosomes. Most researchers suspect this because Trypanosoma brucei is the only trypanosome microbe that humans are not resistant to.[1]

Sleeping Sickness is caused by a unique microbe that, despite its phylogenetic relatives, is extremely pathogenic to humans and other mammals. What is the disease mechanism to this harmful cell? Research explored here aims to explain the inoculation of the disease within both the host and the parasite, as well as explains how the unique symptoms of the disease are produced within the infected human host.

What is African Sleeping Sickness?

Fig. 3 - African Sleeping Sickness affects 30,000 people every year. The disease has been found in 37 African countries, all in the Sub-Saharan areas. [3].

Trypanosomiasis, or better known as African Sleeping Sickness, is an infection of the human nervous system caused by the transmission of a Trypanosome microbe through an insect vector. The disease belongs to the Trypanosome family, with these symptoms especially attributed to the parasite species Trypanosoma brucei. [2] The disease species is transmitted via the tsetse fly, a large biting fly located primarily in tropical African countries. The areas most at risk for such an infection are those of Sub-Saharan Africa: countries stretching from Mali to Sudan and than south, with only South Africa as an exception (Fig. 2) [8]. Throughout history, this disease has been classified as a public health problem seen primarily in these African countries. About 10,000 cases of the disease are reported every year to the World Health organization, but unfortunately it is expected that the majority of cases go unreported and/or undiagnosed
Because this disease is vector borne, the microbe, Trypanosoma brucei, enters the human system by ways of the skin. An infected tsetse fly must bite the host, and through this wound the protozoan enters the system. After initial infection, the disease has two stages. The first of these stages is the time in which the parasite is found within the peripheral nervous system, but has not yet infected the central nervous system. When the infection has passed through the blood brain barrier and begins to travel within the central nervous system, the cell has reached the second stage [4]. The disease than acts quickly, leaving its host with symptoms of fever, tremors, swollen lymph nodes, sleep disturbances, and speech problems within the first two weeks of infection. [3] Following weeks lead to neurological deterioration ending in coma and soon after death. An untreated case can expect the disease to become fatal within a few months [4]

Cell Structure and Function

Fig. 4 - The trypanosome cell amongst red blood cells.[4].

Cell Structure

Trypanosoma cells are small (approximately 50um) and heterotrophic, meaning they require complex carbon molecules as means of consumption. The shape of the cell itself is long and oval with curved edges and a strong flagellum projecting off of the back end of the cell (Fig. 4). The cell holds its structure through the presence of a structured cytoskeleton. [7] Because of the many microtubules within its structure dictating the overall form, this cytoskeleton provides definite locations for cell organelles such as the nucleus, kinetoplast, and flagellum throughout the cell. Much of these important organelles live within the posterior end of the cell (end opposite of the the flagella).[5]This end is much wider and as such offers more space for the organelles to fit.

This cell expresses traits within its structure that are rather unique. Analogous to what is seen in its phylum Euglenozoa, the cell has a stiffening paraxial rod within its flagellum. [7] The function and purpose of this identifiable trait to the flagellum has not yet been fully uncovered. However, this trait has not evolved at all through the phylum’s history, indicating its importance to the cell’s survival.[6] Similarities with members of the cells order, Kinetoplastida, exist as well. The Trypanosome cell expresses a large cluster of DNA at the opposite end of the cell from the flagellum. This clump of DNA, otherwise known as the kinetoplast, extends from the cell’s unusually long mitochondrion and functions to determine the cell's form once translocated into its human host. [7]

Upon initial entry into the host environment, the microbe finds itself floating within the bloodstream of the mammal in which it infected. This part of the human system is flowing with host defense mechanisms, both innate and adaptive immune responses, ready to attack any intruder. Trypanosoma has evolved to travel through this environment without detection through the presence of variant surface glycoproteins (VSG) that coat its cell wall. [7] These VSGs express one of ~1500 surface glycoprotein genes. The majority of these VSG genes function silenty. They recombine to form many different patterns that ultimately construct an unknown coat for the outisde of the cell membrane, making the cell undistinguishable by host antibodies. The gene pattern used to express these proteins changes with every 100th replication cycle to ensure the infections longevity. [7] The number of genes and gene combinations is so plentiful to ensure the continued protection of the cell from the human immune system. Upon initial detection of the cell, the host immune system will begin launching a complementary protection response against trypanosoma. The change in the transcription of the glycoprotein genes ensures that this complementary immune response is ineffective against the pathogen because the new VSG membrane coat has developed and is thereby undetectable. This characteristic is why patients with trypanosomiasis often experience symptoms of the disease followed by a period of latency. [7] The disease has not dissipated but rather evaded the developed defenses of the host cell. These VSG properties are only found at certain times within the cells life cycle: when the cell is developing within the saliva of the vector and when traveling through the infected bloodstream.

Inoculation Within the Insect Vector

Fig. 5 - The life cycle and cell shape of trypanosoma brucei gambiense within the tsetse fly vector[5].

The only known vector for the disease is the tsetse fly. Strangely, this fly initially contracts the microbe from biting infected mammals, either human or animal, who conceal the pathogenic parasite [8] Once an individual fly gains the pathogenic cell, it modifies itself into a form that can be delivered to human hosts. In order to transform into the correct version of itself, that is the metacyclic form, the cell undergoes a series of developmental cycles including cell division to prepare themselves for infection. At the end of the development within the vector, the cell is not yet pathogenic. Once relocated into the host, the cell modifies into its pathogenic form. The development of this cell has three different chronological forms: the procyclic form, the epimastigote form and the metacyclic form (Fig. 5). The procyclic and epimastigote forms exist for multiplication purposes, whereas the metacyclic form functions as an adaptation period in order to effectively integrate itself within a human host. [9]

Upon entrance into the insect from ingesting an infected human’s blood, the so called “stumpy” form of T. brucei enters and must adjust itself to survive within the environment of the fly. This initial transformation is composed of a variety of chemical transformations that are not yet fully understood. It is assumed that proteases that exist within the insect’s midgut ignite a response to the new environment. [9] Beyond this idea, some believe that the microbe posses a cold-shock response that appears as the microbe travels from the warm-blooded human to the exothermic fly. Despite the controversy of this transformation, the “stumpy” form of the trypanosome remodels into the first form, the procyclic form. [9] This form only lasts a very short period of time before it transforms again. The microbe attaches itself onto the cells within the gut of the fly, a space referred to as the ecto peritrophic space. The connection to the cells within this space allows the form to change into one more suitable for travel. This new form is called the trypomastigote. [9] The trypomastigote moves rather rapidly up the midgut of the insect and into the salivary glands. By connection to the kinetoplast, the cell enters the second form, epimastigote form. This long form resides and begins replication within the salivary gland cell membranes. The cell must soon divide to form the short epimastigote form. [9] This form is currently believed to be responsible for the production of the infectious version of the trypanosome. The epimastigote form provides the groundwork for the growth of the metacyclic trypanosomes, which is the first form of the infectious agent seen once translocated into the host. [9] Figure 5 depicts these many forms, identifying the changes seen within the cell's shape (Fig. 5). This cycle through the tsetse fly gut and salivary glands takes a minimum of two weeks. The exact series of changes that causes the differentiation of the cell forms is still under research. However, research up to this point has proven that the relocation of the kinetoplast is vital to the growth of long epimastigote cells and ultimately the production of the infectious agent.

Fig. 6 - The life cycle describing the sturcture of each form of the T. brucei cell on its way to pathogenicity. The “stumpy”, or pathogenic, version of the cell is distinct by its shorter and less-slender shape. The cell no longer needs its lenth for mobility, but instead must be as compact as possible in order to infect. [6].

Final Transformation Within the Host System

The trypanosome cell type that is transmitted from the tsetse fly to its mammalian host is metacyclic. [9] Once this happens, an extensive series of chemical signals occurs to change this metacyclic form into the known and pathogenic cell that induces the symptoms of sleeping sickness. When bitten, the microbe is immediately relocated into the bloodstream of the affected host. This is when the metacyclic form transforms into bloodstream trypomastigotes, otherwise known as the slender form of the trypanosome cell. The cell than enters a phase of exponential growth via binary fission. [10] The human environment is very different from that of the fly’s salivary glands. This series of reproduction serves to adjust the microbe to their new living conditions. After reproduction, the cells transform for the final time into what is called the stumpy version. These cells are now stable and cannot divide in daughter cells anymore. They relocate themselves into an array of bodily fluids such as the lymph nodes or the spinal fluid. Once in these locations, the cell’s main goal is to access the central nervous system (CNS) to bring forth the symptoms we attribute to African Sleeping Sickness.[10] Figure 6 shows the drastic change seen between the metacyclic cell form (first invading cell form) and the "stumpy" form (pathogenic form). The cell is no longer long and slender and lacks its flagellum. The cell's purpose is not to be motile anymore, but instead to be compact in order to pass the BBB and invade brain tissue.

Entry and Attack

Entry Within the Mammalian Host

The initial contraction of sleeping sickness comes from the tsetse fly. This insect vector shares the trypanosome cell with its host through an unwarranted exchange. The fly injects its tube like mouth through the skin of the mammal and by the transmission of their saliva, directly inserts the dangerous cells into the host bloodstream. [7] This mechanism is how trypanosoma was initially shared with mammalian species, however this is not the only way that a person can be infected. Because the cell uses the host bloodstream for travel throughout the body, the disease will infect a developing fetus at any point within the host’s pregnancy. [11] As problematic as this microbe is for growing humans, it is even more dangerous to a developing fetus. Trypanosoma cells have also, in some cases, been found to be transmitted through sexual contact. However, this portal of entry has yet to be fully discovered. [11]

Attack through the blood and nervous system

The invasion mechanism of T. Brucei has multiple steps or stages. Every step of the invasion affects a different aspect of the human body, ranging from the lymphatic system and blood to the white matter of the brain. Understanding the disease mechanism of this harmful cell will help in expanding the possibilities of its treatment. The initial attack of the microbe occurs within the blood vessels. The cells begin to push themselves through the capillary beds of the host epithelial cells causing deep lesions. [9] The goal at this point in the life cycle is to relocate within larger, more favorable blood vessels. These would include any blood vessel that leads to larger organ systems such as the spinal cord. After the lesions have persisted for a few days, the lymph nodes of the host begin to drain in attempt to clear the body of infection allowing the microbes to travel through them, infecting the lymphatic system. [9] This is the point of the life cycle that initiates symptoms such as headache, fever, fatigue, etc. These symptoms are caused by the trypanosoma microbes invading and than consuming the lymphatic system cells. The infection of the lymphatic system causes an identifiable sequelae: The swelling of a lymph node around the trapezius of the host often referred to as “Winterbottom’s sign”. [9]

Fig. 7 - The average number of parasites found within human brain matter with each increasing day post-infection. A substantial amount are shown to be found in the extra-vascular corpus callosum by day 45. This is when the symptoms of coma and death would arise within the victim. [13]

The ultimate goal of the microbe T. brucei is to reach the brain through a variety of flowing parts of the body such as the bloodstream and spinal fluid. The cell’s traveling process to inhabit brain matter takes around fifty days. Research done by neuroscience faculty at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden studied mice to understand at what points the trypanosoma cell became fully immersed into the brain tissue of the host. [13] By the twelfth day of the study, researchers found the microbe within the blood capillaries of the brain, with only the occasional parasite found living outside of the vessel walls (Fig. 7). At day forty-two, the experimenters began to see trypanosoma frequently throughout the parenchyma (Fig. 7). The amount of cells within this location had only increased by day fifty of the study. Once within the parenchyma, the cells were most often found within the white matter of the brain, opposed to the cerebral cortex. [13] The white matter is the deeper tissue parts of the brain. This part of the brain is described to be primarily composed of the axons of neurons, which function to send electrical signals from one neuron to the next [12] It only took an additional five days for these parasitic microbes to move from the white matter to the septal nuclei, confined primarily to the brain parenchyma. It was noted that an remarkable abundance of the found cells were surrounding very large vessels of these nuclei. [13]

The largest research question surrounding the inoculation of brain tissue with T. brucei has to do with how this large cell can pass the blood brain barrier, otherwise known as the main filtering system between the brain and capillaries. The blood brain barrier (BBB) is extremely selective in what it allows to pass towards the brain. This structure is one within the human body that has the most security, yet continuously is deceived and allows T. brucei to pass leading to fatality. There are a great variety of theories on how this exchange occurs, but one appears to be more likely than the rest. Using a model system, brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs), experimenters found that the passage of the microbe likely has something to do with calcium channels. [14] With the presence of the trypanosome microbe, the BMECs increased greatly in their oscillatory Ca2+ levels. [14] This indicated the possibility that these microbes can alter the integrity of the monolayers within the BBB. These clear increases can be dictated by either a living T. Brucei cell or by their secretions. These cells depend largely on the presence of cysteine protease in relationship with the barrier in order to control its permeability. These complexes likely are the structures that recruit these internal calcium ions. The effectiveness of passing by the microbe has been related to the strength of their cysteine proteases. [14] Currently, the signals and responses that these proteases send have yet to be fully clarified. However, they are very important target locations for antibiotic treatment. [14]

Treatment and Prevention


Treatment for sleeping sickness is always recommended. Depending on the stage of the disease, it can be more more difficult to treat and require a range of responses. Beyond these challenges, Sleeping Sickness is quite difficult to treat because of the limitation on available antibiotics and regimen, which are quite toxic and complicated to begin with. Only four drugs have been approved for treatment: pentamidine, suramin, eflornithine and melarsoprol. [15] All of these drugs contain a certain level of toxicity. The least harmful of these prescriptions are pentamidine and suramin, used to treat early stages of the disease. Eflornithine is a medication designed to treat those battling the second stage of sleeping sickness. Starting in 2009, a less common drug nifurtimox has been combined with eflornithine to treat secondary stages of the infection. [15] This is the most common treatment across those countries affected by the disease. This combination appears to be the safest and most effective treatment available at the time as well as the simplest regimen to administer. Melarsoprol is the only cleared antibiotic for the last stage of sleeping sickness.[15]

Beyond antibiotic medication, sleeping sickness often requires medical surveillance. In the early stages of the disease, the symptoms are as simple as a fever and malaise. When a patient is showing early signs of the infection, they are put under neurological watch in attempts to spare the patient from the brutality of central nervous system invasion by the microbe. [16] The vigilance increases greatly with patients expressing symptoms of the infection at later stages. If the infection has made its way into the central nervous system, medical professionals will often provide airway management, a blood smear, a complete blood cell count, and a spinal tap in search for trypanosome cells within the cerebral spinal fluid. [16]


Medical research on antibiotic resistance to sleeping sickness is on the rise. There has yet to be a vaccination designed to create immunity against this harmful disease. Because of this disease’s primary transportation being through an insect vector, it is advised to always wear bug repellent and long-sleeved clothing when travelling through a tsetse dense area.[17] Avoiding these known areas provides the greatest protection against the infection. However, when travel through these locations is unavoidable, it is favored to introduce bush clearing methods as well as wild game culling. [17]

In July of 2000, members of the Organization for African Unity met to address the problem of sleeping sickness prevention. It was there that the Pan African Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Eradication Campaign (PATTEC) was established. [17] This campaign worked to determine a method for eradicating sleeping sickness entirely. Their decided plan of action was to abolish the tsetse fly entirely which would ultimately exterminate the microbe. They imposed the use of insecticide both in agriculture as well as livestock and animals herds, fly traps, and a method known as sterile insect technique (SIT) which had proved to eradicate the tsetse fly entirely in Zanzibar, Africa. [17] This method is quite expensive and would be, in some locations, impractical to exterminate. The method includes introducing sterile male flies into the environment with intention of them being the primary mates to wild type, female tsetse flies. [18] This mating results in no offspring since the male flies cannot reproduce. This lack of reproduction creates no future generations ultimately eliminating the fly species as a whole.


Trypanosoma brucei gambiense remains to provide a variety of questions for the medical community today. A great deal of research continues to look into the mechanisms in which this disease invades its mammalian host. The mystery of how the microbe infiltrates the blood brain barrier remains as the most popular research topic surrounding sleeping sickness. However, the research that has been done thus far has provided a successful approach to treatment for its victims. Unfortunately, the location in which these infectious tsetse flies reside happens to be a part of the world that is in huge medical need. Most cases of sleeping sickness go undetected and undocumented due to a lack of available medicine. The goal for the future is to be able to provide antibiotic and medical assistance to these people in great need and eventually eradicate this life-threatening disease.


  1. Steverding, Dietmar. “The History of African Trypanosomiasis.” Parasites & Vectors, BioMed Central, 2008
  2. “Disease.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 29 Aug. 2012,
  3. Harless, Julie. “Infectious Disease Flashcards.” African Sleeping Sickness, W.W. Norton and Company
  4. “Disease.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 29 Aug. 2012
  5. [ Matthews, Keith R. “The Developmental Cell Biology of Trypanosoma Brucei.” Journal of Cell Science, The Company of Biologists Ltd, 15 Jan. 2005,
  6. Maharana, B. R., et al. “An Overview on Kinetoplastid Paraflagellar Rod.” Journal of Parasitic Diseases, vol. 39, no. 4, 2014, pp. 589–595.
  7. “Disease.” “Trypanosoma.” Trypanosoma - Microbewiki, 7 Aug. 2010
  8. WHO. “Trypanosomiasis, Human African (Sleeping Sickness).” World Health Organization, World Health Organization, 21 Mar. 2017
  9. “Trypanosome Life Cycle.” Trypanosome Life Cycle - Microbewiki, 10 Aug. 2010
  10. Hamm, B, et al. “Differentiation of Trypanosoma Brucei Bloodstream Trypomastigotes from Long Slender to Short Stumpy-like Forms in Axenic Culture.” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology., U.S. National Library of Medicine, Apr. 1990
  11. WHO. “Trypanosomiasis, Human African (Sleeping Sickness).” World Health Organization, World Health Organization, 21 Mar. 2017
  12. “White Matter of the Brain: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia.” MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine
  13. Mulenga, C., et al. “Trypanosoma Brucei Brucei Crosses the Blood–Brain Barrier While Tight Junction Proteins Are Preserved in a Rat Chronic Disease Model.” Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111), 21 Dec. 2001
  14. Nikolskaia, O. V. “Blood-Brain Barrier Traversal by African Trypanosomes Requires Calcium Signaling Induced by Parasite Cysteine Protease.” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 116, no. 10, 2006
  15. “Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment.” World Health Organization, World Health Organization, 5 Aug. 2016
  16. “African Trypanosomiasis Treatment & Management.” African Trypanosomiasis Treatment & Management: Approach Considerations, Pharmacologic Therapy, Prevention, Medscape, 22 Apr. 2018
  17. “African Trypanosomiasis.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 23 Apr. 2018
  18. “Sterile Insect Technique.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 10 Apr. 2018

Authored for BIOL 238 Microbiology, taught by Joan Slonczewski, 2018, Kenyon College.