Chronic Salmonella Typhi Infection and Gallbladder Cancer

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
Revision as of 04:28, 28 April 2013 by Hmoore2262 (talk | contribs)
This student page has not been curated.

Introduction

Fig. 1. Rod shape and flagella are visualized on S. Typhi bacteria. Copyright © Dr. Volker Brinkmann, Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology.

There is a strong correlation between chronic Salmonella Typhi (S. enterica enterica serovar Typhi) infection and gallbladder cancer.3 S. Typhi, a rod shaped, flagellated, aerobic, Gram-negative bacterium (Fig. 1) is a pathogenic serovar of the S. enterica enterica subspecies. Its pathogenicity is restricted to humans and reported to cause 21 million acute cases of acute typhoid fever annually, with 200,000 fatalities.1 The bacteria invade the mucosal surface of the intestine but soon spread to deeper tissues such as liver, spleen, and bone marrow after phagocytosis by macrophages.1 They can also spread to the gallbladder via ducts from the liver during enterohepatic circulation.2

A small percentage of the individuals who suffer an acute infection—between 3 and 5%—become asymptomatic carriers whose infections persist for many years following the acute illness.7 S. Typhi achieves this persistent carrier state by creating biofilms on cholesterol-based gallstones residing within the gallbladders of infected individuals. This carrier state thus requires both presence of cholesterol gallstones and S. Typhi infection of the gallbladder. Thus, few of the individuals who suffer acute infection are at risk for chronic carriage.2 The first described carrier was Mary Mallon, or “Typhoid Mary”, a food service worker who was both asymptomatic and highly contagious. S. Typhi bacteria are transmitted among individuals—who have been either acutely or chronically affected—primarily through fecal contamination of food or water.7

This carrier state can lead to chronic inflammation of the gallbladder, in which the bacteria metabolize primary bile acids to produce potentially carcinogenic toxins and metabolites. One such carcinogen producer is bacterial β-glucuronidase, a glycosidase that produces mutagenic compounds. These compounds act in addition to the other secondary bile acids produced by bacterial enzyme processing and concentrated in the gallbladder.4 The result is carcinoma of the gallbladder epithelium.3(Fig. 5). One defining feature of the gallbladder is its efficacy in concentrating not only bile salts but also toxins—an effect that amplifies their mutagenic effects. Thus, carcinoma develops here instead of in other organs that are implicated in chronic S. Typhi infection. Epidemiologically, the chronic typhoid carrier state has been demonstrated to be the single most important risk factor for development of gallbladder cancer—surpassing an eightfold increase—in patients with cholesterol-based gallstones.3

Chemical characteristics of the gallbladder and bile salts

Fig. 2. Flow chart demonstrates the structures and synthetic pathways of secondary and conjugated bile acids from primary bile acids. Image reproduced under Creative Commons License.

The gallbladder is an accessory organ that concentrates and stores the primary bile salts produced in the liver. Chemically speaking, primary bile salts mostly consist of variations of cholic and deoxycholic acids (Fig. 2). They are stored in the gallbladder and concentrated markedly, reaching levels exceeding 10-15% of total gallbladder contents.5

Though bile is a detergent and generally toxic to bacteria in such high concentrations, S. Typhi has unique resistance to its toxicity and detergent action. This is due in part to the protection provided by genes such as the PhoP-PhoQ virulence factor. In addition to activating and repressing the production of both membrane and secreted proteins, this regulator has also been implicated in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) modifications. All of these contribute to a bile-resistant phenotype in vivo. This resistance applies also to secondary bile acid products, which include deoxycholic acid and conjugated forms of cholic and chenodeoxycholic acids.20(Fig. 2)

Adaptations of S. Typhi to the gallbladder niche

Fig. 3. Chronic S. Typhi biofilm formation is noted on cholesterol gallstones in the following collection of SEM images from Crawford et al (2010). (A) and (B) represent bacterial growth on cholesterol gallstones taken from infected controls. (C) shows a black, calcium bilirubinate gallstone without bacterial growth despite being taken from a S. Typhi carrier, demonstrating the specificity of cholesterol gallstones. (D) shows absence of biofilm in cholesterol gallstones from an uninfected patient.6 Copyright © 2010 National Academy of Sciences, USA.

Role of cholesterol gallstones and biofilms in chronic S. Typhi carriage

S. Typhi colonizes the gallbladder and persists in an asymptomatic carrier state.5 This carriage is facilitated by formation of biofilms on cholesterol gallstones.6 Significant amounts of S. Typhi can be recovered from cholesterol gallstones removed from infected individuals. SEM images clearly show the presence of bacteria on these gallstones (Fig. 3,6). These can be induced experimentally by feeding mice with a lithogenic diet, which is supplemented with 1% cholesterol and 0.5% cholic acid. Furthermore, bacteria could be recovered from stool samples of infected mice with cholesterol gallstones—but not control mice—for over a year.6 This is due to the continuous shedding of planktonic cells from the sessile, matrix-bound population. Epidemiologically speaking, this is the mechanism of contagion through subsequent contamination of food and water, particularly in less developed countries.7

Significantly, it also takes much longer for the mice with cholesterol gallstones to recover from symptoms of acute S. Typhi infection. Consistent results have been obtained on cholesterol substrates in vitro, affirming the specific role of cholesterol in this process.6

The O-antigen capsule is crucial to this specific binding affinity between S. Typhi bacteria and cholesterol, and it is required for biofilm formation. The O-antigen capsule is the key component of the exopolysaccharide (EPS) matrix, which provides rigidity to the biofilm and also protects the bacteria that it contains. The operon involved in the process of creating this capsule, yihVW contains the yihP gene that codes for a symporter enzyme implicated in O antigen production. This operon is furthermore upregulated when S. Typhi is grown in a concentrated bile environment. Thus, O-antigen capsule production is not only crucial to biofilm production but also bile induced.7

In the presence of bile, S. Typhi bacteria form loose, multilayer matrices on cholesterol surfaces. These cells produce the O-antigen and other EPS components. On heterogeneous gallstones, S. Typhi does not cover the non-cholesterol surfaces (Fig. 3), which further suggests binding specificity. Benefits conferred by biofilm formation include protection from antibiotic treatment and ability to tolerate the bile-rich gallbladder environment. Strains that are unable to form the O-antigen have been demonstrated to be unsuccessful in biofilm formation.19,8 The O-antigen capsule has accordingly been identified as a potential therapeutic target in other studies.7

Mutagenic and carcinogenic effects

Bile mutation of S. Typhi increases its fitness to niche

Bile salts are able to damage DNA, which then has a mutagenic effect on S. Typhi bacteria that contributes to their adaptation to the gallbladder niche.9

Fig. 4. Genetic map showing the full S. Typhi genome was created with simultaneous assay. Genes are color coded for function; note in particular that genes related to bile tolerance are shown in brown.21Image reproduced under Creative Commons License.

One proposed mechanism through which S. Typhi is mutated relates to oxidative damage and the conjugation that characterizes bile salt chemistry. Deoxycholic and lithocholic acids, which have been linked to tumor genesis in human, are released during deconjugation of the primary bile acids (Fig. 2). S. Typhi, when in a concentrated bile environment, produces multiple altered proteins in response to bile and deoxycholic acid.20(Fig. 4).

S. Typhi survival within the gallbladder niche environment can thus be selected through genome rearrangements and subsequent polymorphisms that select for changes resulting in increased fitness of S. Typhi in chronic carriers.9 Following exposure to bile salts, analysis of the frequency of S. Typhi genome rearrangements shows that these mutations tend to occur in several common locations and have characteristic manifestations. For example, in very high concentrations, bile mutates S. Typhi in vivo for specific gene targets including DNA adenine methylase, which normally works to decrease bile sensitivity and reduce the rate of mutation in S. Typhi bacteria. Its mutation can thus lead to further mutations.10

S. Typhi metabolizes bile to produce compounds that are carcinogenic to humans

Although bile is not generally characterized as a strong mutagen in an absolute sense, the high concentration and long exposure time associated with chronic carriage are demonstrated to contribute to mutagenic potential and lead to cancerous changes of the gallbladder epithelium.10(Fig. 5) By metabolizing primary bile salts and also the cholesterol of the gallstones, S. Typhi bacteria themselves are capable of producing compounds that mutate the gallbladder epithelium.9 Increased deoxycholate levels, for example, have been reported to change S. Typhi protein production and lead to pathogenicity in human epithelial cells.20

Chemical mechanisms of S. Typhi mutagenic action

Chemical mechanisms have been proposed for the bile salt metabolism that produces carcinogenic compounds in long-term S. Typhi carriers. For example, β-glucuronidase enzyme action can lead to deconjugation of conjugated toxins and bile acids, rendering metabolites that are carcinogenic to the host and also present in high concentrations.4This enzyme metabolizes bile salt substrates. Products are non carcinogenic, but the process includes a high-energy, active intermediate compound. This intermediate acts by binding to DNA and has mutagenic potential in human epithelial cells.12,13

S. Typhi also produces two other key genotoxic compounds with potentially carcinogenic roles: cytolethal distending toxin B (CdtB)—which is the functional unit of cytolethal distending toxin (CDT)—and cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1. CdtB is a DNAase homolog that is the functional unit necessary for CDT expression. Through this mechanism, S.Typhi is able to create DNA lesions in target cells—including, potentially, cells of human hosts—that result in pathogenesis.4,14 Cytotoxic necrotizing factor-1 blocks cytokines, thus leading to inflammation and inhibition of the cell cycle. Furthermore, it modifies proteins from the Rho family, which normally act to terminate transcription in prokaryotes.4

Fig. 5. Gallbladder carcinoma is visualized with H&E stain. Image reproduced under Creative Commons License.

In summary, bacterial enzymes found in S. Typhi act on primary bile acids to produce secondary bile acids in high concentrations and lead to pathology of the gallbladder epithelium. A main concern here is high concentration of biliary deoxycholate, a secondary bile acid present in significantly elevated levels in gallbladder carcinoma patients.4

Another proposed mechanism of S. Typhi mutagenicity relates to interactions with the cholesterol that actually forms the structural basis of the gallstones. These bacteria do not only alter bile salts to a secondary bile form but also convert the cholesterol itself into carcinogenic compounds, including cholesterol 5alpha,6alpha-epoxide, which causes cancerous changes in epithelial cells.11(Fig. 5) Multiple studies demonstrate that S. Typhi bacteria are capable of metabolizing primary bile acids to mutagenic cholic acid derivative forms in the presence of bile and cholesterol substrates.12

Epidemiological links between chronic S. Typhi carriage and gallbladder cancer

Studies performed in both endemic and non-endemic typhoid regions

The relationship between chronic S. Typhi carriage and gallbladder cancer has been researched and characterized in sites worldwide, including endemic typhoid regions such as India and Mexico as well as non-endemic regions such as Scotland and the United States. These data establish a link among cholesterol-based gallstones, S. Typhi carriage, and biofilm presence. One major case-control study performed in India—which has a high typhoid incidence—found that gallbladder cancer patients had significantly higher incidences of S. Typhi than controls and cholelithiasis patients did, at 29.4%. Furthermore, the risk of developing gallbladder carcinomas in these typhoid carriers was 8.47 times higher than it was in non-carriers.15 Furthermore, as found in a study conducted in Mexico, typhoid carriage and biofilms were identified in 4.9% of surgically removed gallstones, but neither was present without the other—thus affirming that the mechanism of carriage is biofilm formation.6>(Fig. 6)

Fig. 6. Chronic S. Typhi biofilm formation is noted on cholesterol gallstones in the following collection of SEM images. (A) represents a gallstone taken from an uninfected control. (B) and (C) show bacterial biofilm growth on gallstones taken from organisms previously infected with S. Typhi.6 Copyright © 2010 National Academy of Sciences, USA.


The specificity of the niche gallbladder environment and the long infection time are key aspects of S. Typhi mutagenicity. A study conducted in Scotland thirty years following the 1964 typhoid outbreak found that 16% of acutely infected individuals had become chronic carriers. Furthermore, these individuals were 167 times more likely to develop gallbladder cancer than were the patients who had suffered acute infections but not chronic carriage. Although risk of other cancers of digestive system organs was also elevated in this population, this elevation was less intense by several orders of magnitude on a logarithmic scale, thus stressing the specificity of carcinogenic conditions to the gallbladder.16 An earlier study conducted with diverse American populations corroborates this specificity, suggesting furthermore that variations of bile salts act as carcinogens within the gallbladder, bile duct, and small bowel. The most marked finding, however, was that individuals identified as chronic typhoid carriers died of hepatobiliary cancer six times more often—a significant difference—than the control subjects did.17

Chemical correlation of S. Typhi carriage with cancer of the gallbladder as opposed to other pathologies

S. Typhi degradation of primary bile acids in the gallbladder is a factor in carcinogenesis in gallbladder carcinoma patients. When patients with gallbladder carcinoma are compared to patients presenting only with gallstones, S. Typhi bacteria were identified in the bile of 40% of gallbladder carcinoma patients and 30% of cholelithiasis patients in one study conducted in India. However, cancer patients but not cholelithiasis patients tend to have significantly elevated secondary bile acid levels—specifically, lithocholate and deoxycholate, which are both linked extensively to carcinogenicity in humans.18

Conclusion

Long-term S. Typhi carriers are uncommon and asymptomatic but have a significantly elevated risk of developing gallbladder carcinoma.3 S. Typhi bacteria survive in the gallbladder niche by forming biofilms on cholesterol gallstones. This survival is favored by structural defenses such as the O-antigen capsule, which facilitate biofilm formation, as well selective pressure exerted by mutagenic effects of bile salts on S. Typhi itself over longer periods of time.7 Finally, S. Typhi itself has a mutagenic effect on the gallbladder epithelium by metabolizing bile salts into carcinogenic secondary bile compounds and other genotoxins.10 This connection has been characterized pathologically and epidemiologically by studies performed worldwide, in which the chronic S. Typhi carrier state constitutes a key risk factor for gallbladder carcinoma.

References

1 Vladoianu, I.R., Chang, H.R. & Pechere, J. C. Expression of host resistance to Salmonella typhi and Salmonella typhimurium: bacterial survival within macrophages of murine and human origin. Microb. Pathog. 8, 83–90 (1990).

2 Hornick, R.B. et al. Typhoid fever: pathogenesis and immunologic control. N. Engl. J. Med. 283, 686–691 (1970).

3 Dutta U, Garg PK, Kumar R, Tandon RK (2000). Typhoid carriers among patients with gallstones are at increased risk for carcinoma of the gallbladder. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95:784-787.

4 Nath G, Gulati AK, Shukla VK (2010). Role of bacteria in carcinogenesis, with special reference to carcinoma of the gallbladder. World J. Gastroenterol. 16:5395-5404.

5 Gonzalez-Escobedo G, Marshall JM, Gunn JS (2011). [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3255095/ Chronic and acute infection of the gall bladder by Salmonella Typhi: understanding the carrier state. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 9:9-14.

6 Crawford RW, et al. (2010). Gallstones play a significant role in Salmonella spp. gallbladder colonization and carriage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107:4353-4358.

7 Crawford RW, Gibson DL, Kay WW, Gunn JS (2008). Identification of a bile-induced exopolysaccharide required for Salmonella biofilm formation on gallstone surfaces. Infect. Immun. 76:5341-5349.

8 Gibson DL, et al. 2006. Salmonella produces an O-antigen capsule regulated by AgfD and important for environmental persistence. J. Bacteriol. 188:7722–7730.

9 Prieto AI, Ramos-Morales F, Casadesús J (2006). Repair of DNA damage induced by bile salts in Salmonella enterica. Genetics. 174:575-584.

10 Prieto AI, Ramos-Morales F, Casadesús J (2004). Bile-induced DNA damage in Salmonella enterica. Genetics 168:1787-1794.

11 Chipman JK (1982). Bile as a source of potential reactive metabolites. Toxicology 25:99-111.

12 Connor TH, Forti GC, Sitra P, Legator MS (1979). Bile as a source of mutagenic metabolites produced in vivo and detected by Salmonella typhimurium. Environ. Mutagen., Vol. 1, ISS 3, 269-276.

13 Kinoshita N, Gelboin HV (1978). Beta-glucuronidase catalyzed hydrolysis of benzoapyrene-3-glucuronide and binding of DNA. Science 199:307-9.

14 Haghjoo E, Galán JE. Salmonella typhi encodes a functional cytolethal distending toxin that is delivered into host cells by a bacterial-internalization pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004; 101: 4614-4619.

15 Shukla VK, Singh H, Pandey M, et al (2000). Carcinoma of the gall bladder is it a sequel of typhoid? Dig. Dis. Sci. 45:900-903.

16 Caygill C, Hill M, Braddick M, Sharp J (1994). Cancer mortality in chronic typhoid and paratyphoid carriers. Lancet 343:83-84.

17 Welton JC, Marr JS, Friedman SM (1979). Association between hepatobiliary cancer and typhoid carrier state. Lancet 313(8120):791-794.

18 Pandey M, Vishwakarma RA, Khatri AK, et al (1995). Bile bacteria and gall bladder carcinogenesis., J Surg. Oncol. 58:282-283.

19Prouty AM, Schwesinger WH, Gunn JS (2002) Biofilm formation and interaction with the surfaces of gallstones by Salmonella spp. Infect Immun 70: 2640–2649.

20van Velkinburgh JC, Gunn JS. PhoP-PhoQ-regulated loci are required for enhanced bile resistance in Salmonella spp. Infect. Immun. 1999; 67:1614–1622. [PubMed: 10084994]

21Langridge GC, Phan MD, Turner DJ, Perkins TT, Parts L, et al. (2009) Simultaneous assay of every Salmonella Typhi gene using one million transposon mutants. Genome Res 19: 2308–2316.

Edited by Hannah Moore, a student of Nora Sullivan in BIOL187S (Microbial Life) in The Keck Science Department of the Claremont Colleges Spring 2013.