Soil Project- English/Ramos: Difference between revisions

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
Line 16: Line 16:
Describe the location and conditions under which the organism was isolated.
Describe the location and conditions under which the organism was isolated.


[[File:Soil_microorganism.png]]
==Description and Significance==
==Description and Significance==
Describe the appearance (colonial and cellular), possible antimicrobial activity etc. of the organism, and why the organism might be significant.
Describe the appearance (colonial and cellular), possible antimicrobial activity etc. of the organism, and why the organism might be significant.

Revision as of 04:37, 8 December 2017

This student page has not been curated.

Classification

Domain; Phylum; Class; Order; family [Others may be used. Use NCBI link to find]

Species

NCBI: Taxonomy

Genus species

Habitat Information

Describe the location and conditions under which the organism was isolated.

Description and Significance

Describe the appearance (colonial and cellular), possible antimicrobial activity etc. of the organism, and why the organism might be significant.

Genome Structure

Describe the size and content of the genome. How many chromosomes? Circular or linear? Other interesting features? What is known about its sequence? The soil microorganism was sent to a lab for sequencing and this was the result: AGACCTGGTAAGGTTCTTCGCGTTGCTTCNAATTAAACCACATGCTCCACTGCTTGTGCGGGCCCCCGTCAATTCC TTTGAGTTTCAACCTTGCGGTCGTACTCCCCAGGCGGAGTGCTTAATGTGTTAACTTCAGCACTGAGGGTGGAACCCCCC AACACCTAGNACTCATCGTTTACGGCGTGGACTACCAGGGTATCTAATCCTGTTTGCACCCCACGCTTTCGCGCCTCAGC GTCAGTTACAGGCCAAAAAGCCGCCTTCGCCACTGGTGTTCCTCCACATCTCTACGCATTTCACCGCTACACGTGGAATT CCACTTTTCTCTCCTGCACTCAAGTCTCCCAGTTTCCAATGACCCTCCACGGTTGAGCCGTGGGCTTTCACATCAGACTT AGGAGACCGCCTGCGCGCGCTTTACGCCCAATAATTCCNGATAACGCTTGCCACCTACGTATTACCGCGGCTGCTGGCAC GTAGTTAACCGTGGCTTTCTGGTTANGTACCGTCAAGGTACNAGCANTTACTCTCGTACTTGTTTCTTCTCTAACAA

Include S Ribosomal sequence that you obtained from PCR and sequencing here.

Cell Structure, Metabolism and Life Cycle

Interesting features of cell structure; how it gains energy; what important molecules it produces. On October 20th, 2017; we used LB broth that had been previously cultured the week prior with one small colony of our soil microorganism. Using this broth we performed chemical tests and these were the results: 1. Inoculated Methyl Red and Voges-Proskauer broth to test for fermentation. Result: Negative; it did not produce mixed acid fermentation and it did not convert glucose to neutral end products. 2. Citrate test. Using a Simmons Citrate slant and an inoculating needle stabbed the slant and streaked the slant. Result: Negative; it does not use Citrate as its only carbon source. 3. Sulfur Indole Motility Test (SIM): Result: Negative. It does not produce Indole, it does not reduce sulfur and it is non-motile. 4. Nitrate reduction test. Using a Nitrate broth tube, inoculated with our microorganism. The result of the first step the reaction was Negative; this meant it did not reduce nitrates. So we went to the second step adding Zinc powder. This result was Negative as well; The result is the microorganism does not convert Nitrate to Nitrite neither to other end products. Negative for Nitrate or other end products. 5. Urea Hydrolysis Test. Inoculated a urea broth tube. Result: Negative; it cannot convert Urea to ammonia. 6. Triple Iron Sugar (TSI) test. Inoculateda TSI slant. Our soil microorganism was negative for fermentation.

Physiology and Pathogenesis

Biochemical characteristics, enzymes made, other characteristics that may be used to identify the organism; contributions to environment (if any).
If relevant, how does this organism cause disease? Human, animal, plant hosts? Virulence factors, as well as patient symptoms.

October 6th tests: Phenol Red Broth: Negative for fermentation. Starch Hydrolysis test: Negative. Casein Hydrolysis Test: Positive.Casein Hydrolisis.png

Gelatin Hydrolysis test: negative. DNA hydrolysis: Negative. Lipid hydrolysis: Negative. October 20th: Methyl Red and Voges-Proskauer: Negative. Citrate test: Negative. SIM medium test: Negative. Nitrate reduction: Negative (first step and second step also negative). Urea Hydrolysis test: Negative. Triple Iron Sugar test: Negative for fermentation. Oct. 27th tests: Oxidase test: Negative. MacConkey Agar test: Negative. Eosin Methylene Blue agar test: Negative. Hektoen Enteric Agar test: Negative. Decarboxylation test: Negative. Phenylalanine Deaminase Test: negative. Nov 3rd: Blood agar: soil microorganism had a weak alpha positive result; this means it causes partial hemolysis. Manitol salt agar: Negative. Phenylethyl Alcohol Agar (PEA): Positive, the soil microorganism had growth. This means it is not gram negative because this media inhibits growth of gram negative microorganisms. This media is selective for gram positive microorganisms; it actually promotes the growth of gram positive. This confirms it is a gram positive organism. Catalase test: Positive. When drops of hydrogen peroxide were placed on a colony that had been spread on a slide, it produced bubbles. Salt tolerance test: Negative. Bile Esculin test: Negative. Bacitracin/Optochin Susceptibility test: Soil microorganism was resistant to both. Nov 10th Antimicrobial susceptibility test (Kirby-Bauer method):

soil microorganism was sensitive to Ticarcinin/Clavulanic acid, Vancomycin and Ampicilli/Sulbactam;  

Resistant to: Cefoxitin and Ceftazidime. Disinfectants: highly sensitive to 100% Bleach. Somewhat sensitive to Lavender, 5% Bleach and Rosemary. Not sensitive to orange.Disinfectant susceptibility.png

Antimicrobial susceptibility.png

References

Picture taken in class.

Author

Page authored by Tara English and Teresa Ramos, students of Prof. Kristine Hollingsworth at Austin Community College.