Talk:Bioremediation: Difference between revisions

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Also great use of pictures to illustrate aromatic compounds[[User:Njppatel|Njppatel]] 18:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
----
Great page, i especially liked how you gave a real life example of the exon valdez spill to illustrate the concept of bioremdiation[[User:Njppatel|Njppatel]] 18:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Great page, i especially liked how you gave a real life example of the exon valdez spill to illustrate the concept of bioremdiation[[User:Njppatel|Njppatel]] 18:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
----
----

Revision as of 18:44, 13 March 2008

Also great use of pictures to illustrate aromatic compoundsNjppatel 18:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


Great page, i especially liked how you gave a real life example of the exon valdez spill to illustrate the concept of bioremdiationNjppatel 18:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


The Microbe page that our group created is for phanerochaete chrysosporium Sdemetriou 01:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


would be good in intro to define in situ vs ex situ remediation. Ex situ then cover the use of bioreactors and other such systems.

Kate Scow 01:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

looking very good. Make sure you use proper scientific nomenclature for naming organisms: genus starting with caps and species name starting with lower case.

Also I think it flows better to start with pollutants and put the organisms second. Kate Scow 01:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)



IMPORTANT NOTE ON ADDING COMMENTS TO DISCUSSION PAGE

  • Add new comments to the TOP of the discussion page, so that we have newest comments first.
  • After your comment, type four tilde marks ( ~~~~ ). This displays the time and your user name, so that we can tell who left the comment and when.
  • At the end of your comment, type four hyphens "----" to create a line to separate your comment from the next commentator.
  • Make a note on this page below the comment after you've addressed it. Add the ( ~~~~ ) after your note so we know who addressed the comment. Your note could look something like .. "Good idea, we fixed it.Irina C 23:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)" or "I don't think we need to do this because.. Irina C 23:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)"

Looking good! Is your source on-line? You can create an external link like this. - Irina C 22:49, 10 February 2008 (UTC)