Difference between revisions of "Talk:Microbial Biofuel Mechanisms and Diversity"

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
Line 3: Line 3:
 
I think your paper was really great! I liked that you included the quote at the beginning, I thought that it was a nice touch. Overall, I thought that your paper was very easy to read and comprehend. I could really see your own writing in this paper because it seems like everything was said in your own words, which is not easy to do. I think it would be good to include a conclusion or wrap-up, possibly about future work and or the most sustainable form of biofuel. And don't forget to fix subscripts such as CO2 to CO<sub>2</sub>!  
 
I think your paper was really great! I liked that you included the quote at the beginning, I thought that it was a nice touch. Overall, I thought that your paper was very easy to read and comprehend. I could really see your own writing in this paper because it seems like everything was said in your own words, which is not easy to do. I think it would be good to include a conclusion or wrap-up, possibly about future work and or the most sustainable form of biofuel. And don't forget to fix subscripts such as CO2 to CO<sub>2</sub>!  
  
-Thanks!
+
Thanks!
 +
-Rhea Le

Revision as of 05:14, 3 May 2014

Hi Owen,

I think your paper was really great! I liked that you included the quote at the beginning, I thought that it was a nice touch. Overall, I thought that your paper was very easy to read and comprehend. I could really see your own writing in this paper because it seems like everything was said in your own words, which is not easy to do. I think it would be good to include a conclusion or wrap-up, possibly about future work and or the most sustainable form of biofuel. And don't forget to fix subscripts such as CO2 to CO2!

Thanks! -Rhea Le