Talk:Origins of a Homochiral Microbial World: Difference between revisions

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:




This was an extremely interesting article.  I thought your introduction was really strong and your explanation of chirality was very easy to understand.  Your examples were well-chosen and added interesting details about the issue you discussed.  I did think that Table 1 was a little confusing and maybe you could explain the data it presents a bit more clearly. Also, I thought your third section about aqueous amplification was a little weaker than the other two.  Is there anything you could add or expand upon regarding this topic?  Overally, I thought your page was really well-written in an engaging tone.  It made me interested in learning more about this topic.
This was an extremely interesting article.  I thought your introduction was really strong and your explanation of chirality was very easy to understand.  Your examples were well-chosen and added interesting details about the issue you discussed.  I did think that Table 1 was a little confusing and maybe you could explain the data it presents a bit more clearly. Also, I thought your third section about aqueous amplification was a little weaker than the other two.  Is there anything you could add or expand upon regarding this topic?  Overall, I thought your page was really well-written in an engaging tone.  It made me interested in learning more about this topic.

Latest revision as of 02:41, 21 April 2009

This was a well written and thought-provoking page. Perhaps a diagram of CLP would be helpful. Is there any research that suggests a combination of physical and CPL methods break and amplify amino acids?


This was an extremely interesting article. I thought your introduction was really strong and your explanation of chirality was very easy to understand. Your examples were well-chosen and added interesting details about the issue you discussed. I did think that Table 1 was a little confusing and maybe you could explain the data it presents a bit more clearly. Also, I thought your third section about aqueous amplification was a little weaker than the other two. Is there anything you could add or expand upon regarding this topic? Overall, I thought your page was really well-written in an engaging tone. It made me interested in learning more about this topic.