Talk:Polymer Degradation by Roseateles depolymerans: Difference between revisions

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
(Created page with "Very interesting topic-I am very excited to read this page...I will update my commentary shortly-Damaris Garduno")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Very interesting topic-I am very excited to read this page...I will update my commentary shortly-Damaris Garduno
Minor spelling issues (e.g. The mechanisms by which each species degrades these polymers differs, but it **correction:is** dependent on the class of enzymes utilized by the bacteria, italicize every time you mention the species(I missed some on my page too at first),line up the figures closer to the areas where they are first mentioned, and some sentences may flow better if you split them into two (I have this same problem, but sometimes introducing a period instead of a coma is the best thing to do). It might also be structurally appealing to the reader if you divide up your sections into the three larger topics you mentioned you would cover in the introduction. Overall, the topic seems very interesting but broader audience may be able to appreciate your work more if you define some of the chemistry terms used, such as endergonic... but really, it's up to who you decide your target audience to be. Personally, I would have been more excited about the text if you started off with less chemistry talk and more accessible things such as the bacteria description. Overall, it's great the way it is now but could be a little more reader-friendly with a bit of work:)
-Damaris Garduno

Revision as of 01:41, 1 May 2014

Minor spelling issues (e.g. The mechanisms by which each species degrades these polymers differs, but it **correction:is** dependent on the class of enzymes utilized by the bacteria, italicize every time you mention the species(I missed some on my page too at first),line up the figures closer to the areas where they are first mentioned, and some sentences may flow better if you split them into two (I have this same problem, but sometimes introducing a period instead of a coma is the best thing to do). It might also be structurally appealing to the reader if you divide up your sections into the three larger topics you mentioned you would cover in the introduction. Overall, the topic seems very interesting but broader audience may be able to appreciate your work more if you define some of the chemistry terms used, such as endergonic... but really, it's up to who you decide your target audience to be. Personally, I would have been more excited about the text if you started off with less chemistry talk and more accessible things such as the bacteria description. Overall, it's great the way it is now but could be a little more reader-friendly with a bit of work:) -Damaris Garduno