Candidatus Solibacter usitatus

This student page has not been curated.

Classification

Bacteria; Phylum: Acidobacteria; Class: Solibacteres; Order: Solibacterales; Family: Solibacteraceae

Species

NCBI: Taxonomy

• Candidatus Solibacter usitatus

Description and Significance

Figure 1. picture descrip. Image from springer [1]

This species was initially isolated from rotationally grazed pasture of perennial ryegrass and white clover in Victoria, Australia (1).

It has an exceptionally large genome and is theorized to engage in horizontal gene transfer which contributes to its ability to persist in an environment. This species produces enzymes which are capable of breaking down organic carbon for metabolism and participating in reducing nitrates. Both lend to the creation of heterogeneous nutrient concentrations throughout the soil it inhabits (4).

This species growth has been observed microscopically in soils, but it forms clusters in liquid culture (3). In nature, this species produces a biofilm which acts as an ecosystem engineer for soil. It does this by producing a medium that resides between soil particles. As the species engages in ion transfer with the environment it produces the biofilm to protect itself. This slowly expanding biofilm reduces moisture and nutrient fluxuations, which contributes towards ecosystem survival under environmental stress conditions (4).

Genome Structure

Figure 2. Whole genome sequence for Candidatus Solibacter usitatus. Image from the IMG system [2]

Based on whole genome sequencing, this species was found to have a 9.9 Mb long genome (5), which is about twice the size of other closely related Acidiobacteria found to inhabit soil (4). Horizontal gene transfer is hypothesized to account for how this species acquired its unusual genome size (4), and also implies biological and ecological strains upon the living organism (5). It is theorized that the amount of mobile elements encoded in a genome correlate with the historical frequency of horizontal gene transfer events. This is significant because mobile elements are theorized to contribute toward genome plasticity and evolution over time, which could provide a competitive advantage to this species and enable it to exploit various environmental resources (6).

A large number of genes encoding for carbohydrate transport and metabolism were found. This species has more genes encoding these functions than “the human genome and about three times as many as Saccharomyces cerevisiae” (8). These genes were also found to have high sequence similarity with fungal homologs which further suggests an ancestral horizontal gene transfer (4).

Genes encoding for candidate cellulases of glycoside hydrolases were found, which suggests this species is capable of degrading cellulose substrates and implies the genome is also encoded with other enzymes capable of degrading plant compounds (4). Further analysis also suggests this species has the flexibility to metabolize carbon as a mixotroph because it contains genes encoding for carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (7). Since oxidation of carbon monoxide has been prevalently documented among other major groups of soil organisms (7), it is hypothesized that this along with the ability to degrade complex polymers associated with vegetation, occur as a survival mechanism in environments with low carbon concentration (4).

The genetic potential for nitrate reductase was observed. This potential is significant because nitrogen reduction is a multi-step process yielding in molecular nitrogen, which is a limiting nutrient in ecosystems. This species ability to reduce nitrates leads to heterogeneous deposition and subsequent spatial variability in nutrient concentrations across a landscape. No evidence for nitrogen fixation or denitrification has been demonstrated (4).

While this species is not thought to contain genes for iron permease, which is involved in iron uptake (9), it has sequences with domain structures similar to those used in other species. Gene sequence libraries document the 16S rRNA from iron-rich mine environments to be frequently dominated by Acidobacteria (10, 11, 12). This suggests possible involvement with iron (II) uptake and is hypothesized to be a valuable role in iron redox reactions (4).

Cell Structure, Metabolism and Life Cycle

Figure 1. picture descrip. Image from springer [3]

This species is a small (4) rod shaped bacterium (1). It is non-motile and free living in aerobic habitats within mesophilic temperatures (1) at a pH in the range of 3.5-6.5 (4). It is chemoorganotrophic; utilizing organic carbon for growth and energy (1). It persists in environments with high substrate affinity and low nutrient concentration (4), by engaging in biofilm production. It has a slow metabolism and is only culturable in oligotrophic media (4).

This species is equipped with a large number of anion:cation symporters (4). These transporters are thought to be advantageous to organisms living in low nutrient environments (13). When compared to other closely related Acidiobacteria, this species has a 2-4 times as many transporters. It also had a large number of secondary porters to transport various other substrates such as amino acids, metals, fatty acids, proteins, in a carrier-mediated process (4).

Ecology and Pathogenesis

Figure 3. Soil matrix. Image from FAO [4]

.

This species has been observed to engage in environmentally dependent functions. This functional diversity is hypothesized to aid in dealing with extreme variation in moisture, temperature, and nutrient cycles (6).

Cellulose production exhibited by this species contributes toward biofilm production, which increases its survivability under conditions of environmental stress by aiding in moisture retention and providing soil with aeration (14, 15). The biofilm production exhibited by this species also functions to reduce nutrient fluxuations by acting as a medium between the soil particles (2). This is significant because water and nutrients are valuable commodities to understand in light of global environmental change.

Cellulase synthesis by acidobacteria has been suggested to promote the ability of a biofilm to adhere to ferric iron-rich substrates and produce “bioshrouds” to be used remedially in sulfide mine tailing environments (16). This suggests the future of characterizing cellulose production should include testing formation ability of the microfibrils to demonstrate the network formation (4).

References

[Sample reference] Takai, K., Sugai, A., Itoh, T., and Horikoshi, K. "Palaeococcus ferrophilus gen. nov., sp. nov., a barophilic, hyperthermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2000. Volume 50. p. 489-500.

1. GOLD CARD: Gc00446. Candidatus Solibacter usitatus Ellin6076. The Regents of the University of California. 2011. <http://genomesonline.org/cgi-bin/GOLD/bin/GOLDCards.cgi?goldstamp=Gc00446>.

2. Pearce D.A., Newsham K.K, Thorne M.A.S., Clavo-Bado L., Kresk M., Laskaris P., et al. "Metagenomic analysis of a southern mairitime Antartic soil". Frontiers in Microbio. 2012. 3:403. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514609/

3. Sait M., Davis, K.E., and Janssen P.H. "Effect of pH on isolation and distribution of members of subdivisions 1 of the phylum Acidobacteria occurring in soil". Appl Environ. Micorbiol. 2006. 72:1852-1857. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1393200/

4. Ward N.L., Challacombe J.F., Janssen P.H., Henrissat B., Coutinho P.M., et al. "Three Acidobacteria genomes provide a first glimpse of their lifestyles in soils and sediments". Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009. 75:2046-2056. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2663196/.

5. Challacombe J.F., Eichorst S.A., Hauser L., Land M., Xie G., et al. "Biological consequences of ancient gene acquisition and duplication in the large genome of candidatus solibater usitatus Ellin6076". 2001. PLoS ONE 6(9): e24882. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0024882.

6. Challacombe J.F., Kuske C.R. "Mobile genetic elements in the bacterial phylum Acidiobacteria". Landes Bioscience. 2012. 2:4, 179-193. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3469429/.

7. King G.M. and Weber C.F. "Distribution, diversity, and ecology of aerobic CO-oxidizing bacteria". Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007. 5:107-118. http://www.nature.com.ezproxy.lib.indiana.edu/nrmicro/journal/v5/n2/full/nrmicro1595.html.

8. Coutinho P.M., Stam M., Blanc E., Henrissat B. "Why are there so many carbohydrate-active enzyme-related genes in plants?". 2003. Trends Plant Sci. 8:563-565. http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.lib.indiana.edu/science/article/pii/S1360138503002498.

9. Stearman R.D., Yuan D.S., Yamaguchi-Iwai Y., Klausner R.D., and Dancis A. "A permease-oxidase complex involved in high-affinity iron uptake in yeast". 1996. Science 271:1552-1557. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2890718.

10. Blothe M.D., Akob D.M., Kostka J.E., Goschel K., Drake H.L., and Kusel K. "pH gradient-induced heterogeneity of Fe(iii)-reducing microorganisms in coal mining-associated lake sediments". Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008. 74:1019-1029. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2258600/.

11. Kleinsteuber, S.F., Muller F.D., Chatzinotas A., Wendt-Potthoff K., and Harms H. "Diversity and in-situ quantification of Acidobacteria subdivision 1 in an acidic mining lake". 2008. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 63:107-117. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.lib.indiana.edu/doi/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00402.x/abstract;jsessionid=85F94DCE880B3CF4BB034F3AA0432E02.f04t01.

12. Rowe O.F., Sanchez-Espana J., Hallberg K.B., and Johnson D.B. "Microbial communities and geochemical dynamics in an extremely acidic metal-rich stream at an abandoned sulfide mine". 2007. (Huclva, Spain) underpinned by functional primary production systems. Environ. Microbiol. 9:1761-1771. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.lib.indiana.edu/doi/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01294.x/abstract.

13. Paulsen L.T., Sliwinski M.K., and Saier M.H., Jr. "Microbial genome analyses :global comparisons of transport capabilities based on phylogenies, bioenergietics and substrate specifities". 1998. J. Mol. Biol. 277:573-592. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9533881.

14. Ude, S., D. L. Arnold, C. D. Moon, T. Timms-Wilson, and A. J. Spiers. "Biofilm formation and cellulose expression among diverse environmental Pseudomonas isolates". 2006. Environ. Microbiol. 8:1997-2011. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.lib.indiana.edu/doi/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01080.x/abstract.

15. White A.T., Bigson D.L., Kim W., Kay W.W., and Surette M.G. "Thin aggregative fimbriae and cellulose enhance the long-term survival and persistence of Salmonella". 2006. J. Bacteriol. 188:3219-3227. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447457/.

16. Johnson, D. B., L. Yajie, and N. Okibe. "“Bioshrouding”: a novel approach for securing reactive mineral tailings". 2008. Biotechnol. Lett. 30:445-449. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17975731

Author

Page authored by Kristine Ader, student of Prof. Jay Lennon at IndianaUniversity.