Lactose Tolerance: Difference between revisions

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
Line 35: Line 35:
<br><br>A citation code consists of a hyperlinked reference within "ref" begin and end codes.
<br><br>A citation code consists of a hyperlinked reference within "ref" begin and end codes.


Perhaps one of the highest-impact short-term genetic digestive change has been the evolution of a Lactase-permanence mutation (LCT). This Lactase permanence mutation, while resulting in a single phenotype, wide can arise from a range of separate SNP's (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms).
Many times throughout the course of human evolution, the Lactase-permanence mutation (LCT) has arisen. This mutation causes the retention of lactase production beyond the young age where humans would typically stop producing it. This Lactase permanence mutation, while resulting in a single phenotype, can arise from a wide range of separate SNP's (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms). What all of these most prevalent lactose permanence enabling SNPs hold in common is that they result in constitutive mutations to the LCT genes.That is to say, lactase is always produced in lactase-persistent individuals, without any variance in production due to increased or decreased lactose uptake. If partial lactase-persistence is brought about by a mutation, it may or may not result in a lactose intolerant phenotype. Less than fifty percent lactase activity is often a useful benchmark in determining function. Below that level of activity, an individual will most likely manifest the symptoms of lactose intolerance.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669050/


The separate incidences of LCT mutants that were positively selected for vary by region and ethnicity. These range in age from 8,000-9,000 years ago (European Populations) to 2,700-6,000 years ago (African Populations). Howvever, on average, the lactase mutation is present at much lower frequencies in African populations versus European or Middle Eastern populations. This results in higher average rates of lactose intolerance within said population. <ref>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4163920/ F. Luca et al. "Evolutionary Adaptations to Dietary Changes." 2014. NIHM.] </ref>
The separate incidences of LCT mutants that were positively selected vary by region and ethnicity. These range in age from 8,000-9,000 years ago (certain European populations) to 2,700-6,000 years ago (certain African populations). Somewhat unsurprisingly, these windows of time tend to correlate with the rise of widespread domesticated animal usage in each region. Each of these individual SNP mutations, however, tend to vary in site and function quite widely. For instance, perhaps one of the most prevalent genotypes for lactase persistent individuals in European populations is located upstream from the LCT gene. This upstream allele, CT-13910, is an important regulator of the LCT gene. The SNP mutation that can occur at that site turns two cytosines (CC) into two thymines (TT). This results in a constitutive promoter, and thus, lactase persistence. Another unique example is that of T/G-13915, which is an SNP of similar function that is most prominent in populations located on the Arabian Peninsula. (Forsgard)
 
Interestingly, wherever these unique SNP mutations may emerge, these traits are very heavily retained in populations that consume milk. This suggests that even in areas that have alternative viable caloric sources, the additional calories that dairy represent are significant enough to be selected for nonetheless.


==Section 2 Microbiome==
==Section 2 Microbiome==

Revision as of 00:56, 5 December 2019

Introduction

Select a topic about genetics or evolution in a specific organism or ecosystem.
The topic must include one section about microbes (bacteria, viruses, fungi, or protists). This is easy because all organisms and ecosystems have microbes.

Compose a title for your page.
Type your exact title in the Search window, then press Go. The MicrobeWiki will invite you to create a new page with this title.

Open the BIOL 116 Class 2019 template page in "edit."
Copy ALL the text from the edit window.
Then go to YOUR OWN page; edit tab. PASTE into your own page, and edit.

Colony of Marburg virus. Transmission electron microscope image taken by Dr. Tom Geisbert


At right is a sample image insertion. It works for any image uploaded anywhere to MicrobeWiki. The insertion code consists of:
Double brackets: [[
Filename: PHIL_1181_lores.jpg
Thumbnail status: |thumb|
Pixel size: |300px|
Placement on page: |right|
Legend/credit: Electron micrograph of the Ebola Zaire virus. This was the first photo ever taken of the virus, on 10/13/1976. By Dr. F.A. Murphy, now at U.C. Davis, then at the CDC.
Closed double brackets: ]]

Other examples:
Bold
Italic
Subscript: H2O
Superscript: Fe3+




Section 1 Genetics

Include some current research, with at least one image.

Sample citations: [1] [2]

A citation code consists of a hyperlinked reference within "ref" begin and end codes.

Many times throughout the course of human evolution, the Lactase-permanence mutation (LCT) has arisen. This mutation causes the retention of lactase production beyond the young age where humans would typically stop producing it. This Lactase permanence mutation, while resulting in a single phenotype, can arise from a wide range of separate SNP's (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms). What all of these most prevalent lactose permanence enabling SNPs hold in common is that they result in constitutive mutations to the LCT genes.That is to say, lactase is always produced in lactase-persistent individuals, without any variance in production due to increased or decreased lactose uptake. If partial lactase-persistence is brought about by a mutation, it may or may not result in a lactose intolerant phenotype. Less than fifty percent lactase activity is often a useful benchmark in determining function. Below that level of activity, an individual will most likely manifest the symptoms of lactose intolerance. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669050/

The separate incidences of LCT mutants that were positively selected vary by region and ethnicity. These range in age from 8,000-9,000 years ago (certain European populations) to 2,700-6,000 years ago (certain African populations). Somewhat unsurprisingly, these windows of time tend to correlate with the rise of widespread domesticated animal usage in each region. Each of these individual SNP mutations, however, tend to vary in site and function quite widely. For instance, perhaps one of the most prevalent genotypes for lactase persistent individuals in European populations is located upstream from the LCT gene. This upstream allele, CT-13910, is an important regulator of the LCT gene. The SNP mutation that can occur at that site turns two cytosines (CC) into two thymines (TT). This results in a constitutive promoter, and thus, lactase persistence. Another unique example is that of T/G-13915, which is an SNP of similar function that is most prominent in populations located on the Arabian Peninsula. (Forsgard)

Interestingly, wherever these unique SNP mutations may emerge, these traits are very heavily retained in populations that consume milk. This suggests that even in areas that have alternative viable caloric sources, the additional calories that dairy represent are significant enough to be selected for nonetheless.

Section 2 Microbiome

Include some current research, with a second image.

While the lactase permanence phenotype is thought to result from a constitutive promoter, meaning that the body is physically unable to adjust its lactase production in accordance with consumption, the human microbiome, on the other hand, is seemingly able to adapt to increases in lactose levels. In an experiment done on the effects of increased lactose presence in the diets of people with lactose malabsorption, the amount of lactase-producing microbes steadily rose in proportion to those microbes unable to digest lactose. Curiously, the converse of this phenomenon was also found to be true, which is that reducing the amount of lactose in the diet reduced the proportion of bacteria which possess the ability to produce lactase. This would suggest that the metabolic tradeoff that lactase production presents outweighs the potential utility it may provide an organism to such an extent that it is actively selected against in the microbiome. (Forsgard)

Another relationship between the microbiome and the digestion of lactose is potentially more beneficial to those with lactose malabsorption. Recent research suggests that the composition of a person's microbiome may affect their ability to digest lactose to an extent. Though the sample study is notably small at eight, it seems that, in part, transplanting certain beta-galactosidase expressing cultures (Such as Lactobacillus acidophilus) may, in fact, reduce the severity of the symptoms associated with lactose intolerance. Because of the incredibly early state of research on the topic, it may be too early for any definitive trends or statements to be espoused with much confidence. [3]

In addition to these previous lactase-dependent relationships, bacteria in the gut microbiome also act as the main driver of the symptoms of lactose intolerance. This occurs when lactose is fermented by bacteria native to the small intestine. This can result in the buildup of bacterial colonies, and gases like hydrogen and methane that arise as a result of fermentation. This results in the manifestation of symptoms such as bloating, indigestion, cramps, and flatulence due to excessive amounts of these gases. In fact, a popular way to test for lactose malabsorption is to study the concentration of hydrogen gas that a person emits after consuming lactose. (Deng)

Conclusion

When one refers to the phenomenon of lactase persistence, one refers to the intersection of demographic trends, genetic mutations, and microbiotic concentrations. Each of these factors can influence the differences between lactase-persistence, lactose malabsorption, and lactose intolerance.



Overall text length should be at least 1,000 words (before counting references), with at least 2 images. Include at least 5 references under Reference section.


References


Edited by [Daniel Frank], student of Joan Slonczewski for BIOL 116 Information in Living Systems, 2019, Kenyon College.