Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
<br><b>Figure 1.</b> Bactericidal antibiotics in low levels increase mutation rate in E. coli due to formation of reactive oxygen species. (A) Fold change in mutation for a control treated with no drug compared to wildtype E. coli exposed to six treatments (1µg/ml ampicillin, 1µg/ml kanamycin, 3µg/ml kanamycin, 15ng/ml norfloxacin, 50ng/ml norfloxacin, or 1mM hydrogen peroxide) (B) Oxidative stress levels of the treatments in A. correlation with mutation rate for wildtype E. coli. For B and C see original publication by Kohanski et al. [[#References|[10]]] | <br><b>Figure 1.</b> Bactericidal antibiotics in low levels increase mutation rate in E. coli due to formation of reactive oxygen species. (A) Fold change in mutation for a control treated with no drug compared to wildtype E. coli exposed to six treatments (1µg/ml ampicillin, 1µg/ml kanamycin, 3µg/ml kanamycin, 15ng/ml norfloxacin, 50ng/ml norfloxacin, or 1mM hydrogen peroxide) (B) Oxidative stress levels of the treatments in A. correlation with mutation rate for wildtype E. coli. For B and C see original publication by Kohanski et al. [[#References|[10]]] | ||
<br><b>Figure 2.</b> (a) Schematic depiction of the structure of mycobacterial cell wall (based on Minnikin’s model) Hydrophilic arabinogalactan and hydrophobic mycolate layers create an envelope that is extremely difficult for antibiotics to permeate. For (b) see original publication by Nguyen and Pieters. [[#References|[6]]] | |||
<br><b>Figure 3.</b> Bactericidal activity profiles of peptidoglycan synthesis inhibitors (PSI) on wildtype and efflux pump knockout (KO) mutant M. tuberculosis strains. The drugs used are ampicillin, meropenem, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin at four different concentrations per drug per M. tuberculosis strain. Source: Dinesh et al. [[#References|[4]]] | |||
<br><b>Table 1.</b> List of genes involved in acquired antibiotic resistance in M. tuberculosis. Includes main drugs dividied by first and second line categorization, their modes of action, and the specific genes that confer resistance. Source: Smith et al. [[#References|[7]]] | |||
==Further Reading== | ==Further Reading== | ||
Revision as of 00:04, 29 March 2015
Tuberculosis (TB) is a potentially deadly disease caused by pathogenic bacteria, usually Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It has existed in humans since ancient times and had high mortality rates without adequate treatment options before the invention of antibiotics , specifically streptomycin in 1943, that were potent enough to kill the bacteria. [6] In the 1960’s, following a drastic reduction in TB rates around the world, people began to predict that the disease could be completely eradicated within a century. [5] However, this goal proved overly-optimistic as drug-resistant strains had begun to emerge since the first use of antibiotics to treat TB. At first this was mainly due to only using a single drug, streptomycin, to treat the infection, prompting the use of multi-drug therapy but in recent decades multi-drug resistant (MDR), extensively- drug resistant (XDR), and totally-drug resistant (TDR) strains of TB have emerged. [1] Many of these strains are effectively incurable, especially the XDR and TDR strains, even for patients with access to an array of anti-TB drugs. [1] Given their grave public health threat it is crucial to study the molecular biology of the intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance in M. tuberculosis in order to develop new drugs that avoid these mechanisms.
Intrinsic Drug Resistance
M. tuberculosis possess a multitude of resistance mechanisms against a wide range of antibiotics, as far as its intrinsic mechanisms (as opposed to acquired mechanisms that are brought about by chromosomal mutations, as discussed below) they can be divided into two categories: passive and specialized resistance. [7]
Passive Resistance Mechanisms
• Impermeable cell wall
o Figure 1A. Schematic depiction of the structure of the mycobacterial cell wall. [6]
o Hydrophobic chemicals unable to enter due to layer of hydrophilic arabinogalactan [6]
Wrapped in hydrophobic mycolic acids to limit entrance of hydrophilic molecules
• Added to arabinogalactan in cell wall by group of mycolyltransferase enzymes
o One gene that encodes one of the mycolytransferases is the FbpA gene
• Shown to be a strong connection between mycolic acid content and antibiotic resistance [6]
o Figure 1B. fbpA mutants display sensitivity to a broad range of antibiotics
o Despite being considered Gram-positive, Mycobacterium cell wall layers create space that resembles the periplasm of Gram-negative bacteria. [6]
o Another piece of evidence supporting the impermeability of the Mycobacterial cell wall is the fact that the time it takes for β-lactams to diffuse through the cell wall takes a hundred times longer than it does for Escherichia coli. [7]
Specialized Resistance Mechanisms
• Modification and degradation of drugs
• Modification of drug targets
• Efflux pumps
o Figure 2. Shows role of efflux pumps in intrinsic resistance of M. tuberculosis to the β-lactam class of antibiotics, as well as vancomycin and bacitracin.
Figure 2. Bactericidal effects of β-lactams on Wild Type and efflux pump knockout (KO) mutant M. tuberculosis strains over 7 days. Dashed line indicated number of cells at the start of the experiment. Source: Dinesh N, Sharma S, Balganesh M. Involvement of Efflux Pumps in the Resistance to Peptidoglycan Synthesis Inhibitors in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2013;57(4):1941-1943. doi:10.1128/AAC.01957-12.
having trouble getting image|thumb|upright|left|
Figure 1. A. Schematic depiction of the structure of the mycobacterial cell wall B. fbpA mutants display sensitivity to a broad range of antibiotics, sensitivity indicated by inhibition zone around discs containing same amount of antibiotics (clear zones) Source: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Mycobacterial+subversion+of+chemotherapeutic+reagents+and+host+defense+tactics%3A+challenges+in+tuberculosis+drug+development. Nguyen L and Pieters J, 2009
At right is a sample image insertion. It works for any image uploaded anywhere to MicrobeWiki. The insertion code consists of:
Double brackets: [[
Filename: Ebola virus 1.jpeg
Thumbnail status: |thumb|
Pixel size: |300px|
Placement on page: |right|
Legend/credit: Electron micrograph of the Ebola Zaire virus. This was the first photo ever taken of the virus, on 10/13/1976. By Dr. F.A. Murphy, now at U.C. Davis, then at the CDC.
Closed double brackets: ]]
Other examples:
Bold
Italic
Subscript: H2O
Superscript: Fe3+
Acquired Resistance
While in many other types of bacteria drug resistance is gained through horizontal gene transfer by plasmids or transposons, in M. tuberculosis all strains with acquired resistance that are currently known are through chromosomal mutations due to the selective pressure of antibiotics. [1] This selection of drug-resistant strains could not occur without the extensive and prolonged use of antibiotics necessary to treat the disease as those strains would have lower fitness under normal conditions. [7] Additionally recent studies, such as that by Kohanski et al. [10], have shown that sub-lethal doses of antibiotics can cause multi-drug resistance in E. Coli due to increased mutation rates by free radicals. (Figure 3.) This could very well apply to M. tuberculosis as well, suggesting that current TB drugs are not only selecting for drug-resistant strains but quite possibly creating them as well.
Promising New Drugs
Benzothiazinones (BTZ)
Dinitrobenzamide derivatives (DNB)
In a relatively recent study by Christophe et al. [2] they used confocal fluorescence microscopy to conduct an assay on the phenotypic effects of various chemical compounds on M. tuberculosis. After infecting macrophages with mycobacteria that expressed GFP (green fluorescent protein) they monitored both amount of green fluorescent bacteria and host cell number. They used known anti-tuberculosis drug such as isoniazid and rifampin as controls and used high-throughput/content screening to test over 50,000 synthetic chemicals. Ultimately 135 were identified as potent inhibitors of mycobacteria in cells with no toxic effect on the host cells. Of these compounds dinitrobenzamide derivatives (DNB) were highly effective even against extremely drug resistant (XDR) strains of M. tuberculosis.
Figure Legends
Figure 1. Bactericidal antibiotics in low levels increase mutation rate in E. coli due to formation of reactive oxygen species. (A) Fold change in mutation for a control treated with no drug compared to wildtype E. coli exposed to six treatments (1µg/ml ampicillin, 1µg/ml kanamycin, 3µg/ml kanamycin, 15ng/ml norfloxacin, 50ng/ml norfloxacin, or 1mM hydrogen peroxide) (B) Oxidative stress levels of the treatments in A. correlation with mutation rate for wildtype E. coli. For B and C see original publication by Kohanski et al. [10]
Figure 2. (a) Schematic depiction of the structure of mycobacterial cell wall (based on Minnikin’s model) Hydrophilic arabinogalactan and hydrophobic mycolate layers create an envelope that is extremely difficult for antibiotics to permeate. For (b) see original publication by Nguyen and Pieters. [6]
Figure 3. Bactericidal activity profiles of peptidoglycan synthesis inhibitors (PSI) on wildtype and efflux pump knockout (KO) mutant M. tuberculosis strains. The drugs used are ampicillin, meropenem, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin at four different concentrations per drug per M. tuberculosis strain. Source: Dinesh et al. [4]
Table 1. List of genes involved in acquired antibiotic resistance in M. tuberculosis. Includes main drugs dividied by first and second line categorization, their modes of action, and the specific genes that confer resistance. Source: Smith et al. [7]
Further Reading
References
3. Crellin PK, Brammananth R, Coppel RL (2011) Decaprenylphosphoryl-β-D-Ribose 2′-Epimerase, the Target of Benzothiazinones and Dinitrobenzamides, Is an Essential Enzyme in Mycobacterium smegmatis. PLoS ONE 6(2): e16869. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016869 4. Dinesh N, Sharma S, Balganesh M. Involvement of Efflux Pumps in the Resistance to Peptidoglycan Synthesis Inhibitors in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2013;57(4):1941-1943. doi:10.1128/AAC.01957-12.
8. Zhao L, Sun Q, Zeng C, Chen Y, Zhao B, Liu H, Xia Q, Zhao X, Jiao W, Li G, et al. Molecular characterisation of extensively drug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in china. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2015 FEB;45(2):137-43. 9. Cui Z, Li Y, Cheng S, Yang H, Lu J, Hu Z, Ge B. Mutations in the embC-embA intergenic region contribute to mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to ethambutol. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014 NOV;58(11):6837-43. 10. Kohanski MA, DePristo MA, Collins JJ. Sub-lethal antibiotic treatment leads to multidrug resistance via radical-induced mutagenesis. Molecular cell. 2010;37(3):311-320. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.003.
Edited by (Noah Knowlton-Latkin), a student of Nora Sullivan in BIOL168L (Microbiology) in The Keck Science Department of the Claremont Colleges Spring 2014.
