Nanobacterium sanguineum: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
The first discernable species of nanobacteria was dubbed ''Nanobacterium sanguineum'' in 1998 by Finnish researchers E. Olavi Kajander and Nev Ciftcioglu; together they found evidence of self-replicating nanobacteria in the blood of humans and cows, along with the presence of 16S ribosomal RNA, evidence that the microbes are indeed alive. In addition, they discovered a unique characteristic among nanobacteria; they all seemed to produce a thick cell envelope of sorts consisting of either calcium compounds or apatite. Due to this property, nanobacteria was hypothesized to be the causes of calcification in certain parts of the body (i.e. kidney stones, plaques in various organs). | The first discernable species of nanobacteria was dubbed ''Nanobacterium sanguineum'' in 1998 by Finnish researchers E. Olavi Kajander and Nev Ciftcioglu; together they found evidence of self-replicating nanobacteria in the blood of humans and cows, along with the presence of 16S ribosomal RNA, evidence that the microbes are indeed alive. In addition, they discovered a unique characteristic among nanobacteria; they all seemed to produce a thick cell envelope of sorts consisting of either calcium compounds or apatite. Due to this property, nanobacteria was hypothesized to be the causes of calcification in certain parts of the body (i.e. kidney stones, plaques in various organs). | ||
However, a couple years later, it was theorized that the particles discovered may not have actually been alive or self-replicating at all. According to a paper published in 2000, the replication witnessed by Kajander and Ciftcioglu may have been due to the properties of apatite itself | However, a couple years later, it was theorized that the particles discovered may not have actually been alive or self-replicating at all. According to a paper published in 2000, the replication witnessed by Kajander and Ciftcioglu may have been due to the properties of apatite itself, and the RNA present was likely a contaminant of another bacteria. | ||
In 2004, a paper written by John C. Lieske ''ey al.'' revealed evidence of particles similar to nanobacteria in various calcified arteries and arterial plaques. These particles not only self-replicated, but were also stained by a DNA probe, suggesting that they may contain nucleic acids, which in turn suggests that these nanoparticles may indeed be alive. | |||
Since then, efforts in isolating nanobacteria from various places in the human body have been a moderate success; nanobacteria have been witnessed in kidney stones, the blood of humans, coronary plaques, and nanobacteria antigens have been detected in those with ovarian cancer and arthritis. Presently there is an emphasis on the pathological properties of nanobacteria and the risks and diseases it may be an indirect cause of. | |||
==Genome structure== | ==Genome structure== | ||
| Line 27: | Line 31: | ||
==Cell structure and metabolism== | ==Cell structure and metabolism== | ||
Not much is known about the cell structure of species within ''Nanobacterium''. When viewed under a electron microscope, they appear to cellwalled microbes that are either rod-shaped or spherical, and staining attempts have indicated that, if they are indeed bacteria, they appear to be Gram negative. Nanobacteria have the unique ability to produce a "shell" of sorts around their bodies composed of apatite or a calcium compound. The function of the "envelope" has yet to be determind. | |||
The metabolic pathways of nanobacteria still prove to be a mystery as well, since there has yet to be infallible proof of RNA or DNA present within nanobacteria. However, one NASA study has shown that in a microgravity environment, nanobacteria seem to grow several times faster, which could serve to be a potential health risk with astronauts. | |||
==Ecology== | ==Ecology== | ||
Revision as of 10:55, 29 August 2007
A Microbial Biorealm page on the genus Nanobacterium sanguineum
Classification
Higher order taxa
cellular organisms; Bacteria; unclassified Bacteria; Nanobacterium
Species
|
NCBI: Taxonomy |
Nanobacterium sanguineum
Description and significance
The genus Nanobacterium is said to contain a group of microbes that, like the name suggests, have dimensions considerably lower than that of regular bacteria, and perhaps even rival those of viruses. Since its discovery, nanobacteria have been the subject of consistent controversy; due to the significant size difference, some researchers have debated whether or not the so-called microorganisms are even alive, much less real. Only recently has it subsided, due to new studies being released.
The first discernable species of nanobacteria was dubbed Nanobacterium sanguineum in 1998 by Finnish researchers E. Olavi Kajander and Nev Ciftcioglu; together they found evidence of self-replicating nanobacteria in the blood of humans and cows, along with the presence of 16S ribosomal RNA, evidence that the microbes are indeed alive. In addition, they discovered a unique characteristic among nanobacteria; they all seemed to produce a thick cell envelope of sorts consisting of either calcium compounds or apatite. Due to this property, nanobacteria was hypothesized to be the causes of calcification in certain parts of the body (i.e. kidney stones, plaques in various organs).
However, a couple years later, it was theorized that the particles discovered may not have actually been alive or self-replicating at all. According to a paper published in 2000, the replication witnessed by Kajander and Ciftcioglu may have been due to the properties of apatite itself, and the RNA present was likely a contaminant of another bacteria.
In 2004, a paper written by John C. Lieske ey al. revealed evidence of particles similar to nanobacteria in various calcified arteries and arterial plaques. These particles not only self-replicated, but were also stained by a DNA probe, suggesting that they may contain nucleic acids, which in turn suggests that these nanoparticles may indeed be alive.
Since then, efforts in isolating nanobacteria from various places in the human body have been a moderate success; nanobacteria have been witnessed in kidney stones, the blood of humans, coronary plaques, and nanobacteria antigens have been detected in those with ovarian cancer and arthritis. Presently there is an emphasis on the pathological properties of nanobacteria and the risks and diseases it may be an indirect cause of.
Genome structure
Due to the relatively controversial nature of nanobacteria, the genome of any of the species within the genus have yet to be sequenced. However, now that new evidence has been seen of nanobacteria truly being alive, extracting the 16S ribosomal RNA of any of its species may be the first step to sequencing the genome.
Cell structure and metabolism
Not much is known about the cell structure of species within Nanobacterium. When viewed under a electron microscope, they appear to cellwalled microbes that are either rod-shaped or spherical, and staining attempts have indicated that, if they are indeed bacteria, they appear to be Gram negative. Nanobacteria have the unique ability to produce a "shell" of sorts around their bodies composed of apatite or a calcium compound. The function of the "envelope" has yet to be determind.
The metabolic pathways of nanobacteria still prove to be a mystery as well, since there has yet to be infallible proof of RNA or DNA present within nanobacteria. However, one NASA study has shown that in a microgravity environment, nanobacteria seem to grow several times faster, which could serve to be a potential health risk with astronauts.
Ecology
Describe any interactions with other organisms (included eukaryotes), contributions to the environment, effect on environment, etc.
Pathology
How does this organism cause disease? Human, animal, plant hosts? Virulence factors, as well as patient symptoms.
Application to Biotechnology
Does this organism produce any useful compounds or enzymes? What are they and how are they used?
Current Research
Enter summaries of the most recent research here--at least three required
References
Edited by student of Rachel Larsen
