Talk:The Symbiosis of Marine Bioluminescent Photobacterium: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "I thought it was good and interesting! Though I think organizationally it might be better to put the "Lux Operon" section before the "Differentiation Techniques" section so that ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I thought it was good and interesting! Though I think organizationally it might be better to put the "Lux Operon" section before the "Differentiation Techniques" section so that the latter section is more clear. I read the differentiation section first and was a little confused because I wasn't sure how the operon was arranged to begin with. Also, I think it would help to include a picture of microscopic-level photobacteria/bioluminescence so the reader will see what you're describing throughout the paper. That could look good right at the start of the paper by the Contents box. Overall, I felt the wiki was effective. | I thought it was good and interesting! Though I think organizationally it might be better to put the "Lux Operon" section before the "Differentiation Techniques" section so that the latter section is more clear. I read the differentiation section first and was a little confused because I wasn't sure how the operon was arranged to begin with. Also, I think it would help to include a picture of microscopic-level photobacteria/bioluminescence so the reader will see what you're describing throughout the paper. That could look good right at the start of the paper by the Contents box. Overall, I felt the wiki was effective. | ||
Overall this was a thoroughly researched and well written wiki page. I have two minor suggestions though. First, I would have some sort of introduction paragraph that places the entire wiki page in context. Jumping right into the | |||
Revision as of 18:47, 6 May 2011
I thought it was good and interesting! Though I think organizationally it might be better to put the "Lux Operon" section before the "Differentiation Techniques" section so that the latter section is more clear. I read the differentiation section first and was a little confused because I wasn't sure how the operon was arranged to begin with. Also, I think it would help to include a picture of microscopic-level photobacteria/bioluminescence so the reader will see what you're describing throughout the paper. That could look good right at the start of the paper by the Contents box. Overall, I felt the wiki was effective.
Overall this was a thoroughly researched and well written wiki page. I have two minor suggestions though. First, I would have some sort of introduction paragraph that places the entire wiki page in context. Jumping right into the
