Evolution of Insect Herbivory

Introduction

The transition from surface streams to the perpetual darkness of underwater caves has driven remarkable evolutionary changes in the Mexican blind cavefish (Astyanax mexicanus). Within the past few million years, populations migrating into caves abandoned their functional visual systems, a trait retained by their stream-dwelling counterparts. This dramatic adaptation is not unique to cavefish; troglobitic animals, including crustaceans, insects, salamanders, and spiders, have independently evolved similar traits, such as eye degeneration and heightened reliance on non-visual sensory systems.

Globally, over a hundred species of cave-dwelling fish exhibit varying degrees of blindness and other cave-specific adaptations, such as reduced pigmentation and enhanced mechanosensory abilities. The Mexican blind cavefish serves as a model organism for exploring how extreme habitats shape life through genetic, ecological, and microbiological influence

Biological evolution is often framed as a process of innovation, with emphasis placed on the development of new traits such as the legs of amphibians, the hair and mammary glands of mammals, or the large and complex brains of higher primates. However, this perspective overlooks an equally important evolutionary phenomenon: regressive evolution, or the loss of structures and traits that are no longer advantageous in a given environment. In many cases, evolutionary progress entails trade-offs. For a newly developed trait, an organism’s ancestors may have lost features that were no longer critical for survival. For instance, amphibians sacrificed the gills, scales, and tails that were essential to their aquatic ancestors, adapting instead to a terrestrial lifestyle. Blind cavefish exemplify regressive evolution through their loss of functional eyes and pigmentation. Living in absolute darkness, vision itself offers no survival advantage, while maintaining eyes and pigmentation would demand considerable metabolic energy. Natural selection, therefore, favors the loss of these structures. This evolutionary process illustrates that regressive changes are not failures of evolution but rather strategic responses to environmental pressures.

Figure 1. Electron micrograph of the Ebola Zaire virus. This was the first photo ever taken of the virus, on 10/13/1976. By Dr. F.A. Murphy, now at U.C. Davis, then at the CDC.[1].

At right is a sample image insertion. It works for any image uploaded anywhere to MicrobeWiki. The insertion code consists of:
Double brackets: [[
Filename: PHIL_1181_lores.jpg
Thumbnail status: |thumb|
Pixel size: |300px|
Placement on page: |right|
Legend/credit: Electron micrograph of the Ebola Zaire virus. This was the first photo ever taken of the virus, on 10/13/1976. By Dr. F.A. Murphy, now at U.C. Davis, then at the CDC.
Closed double brackets: ]]

Other examples:
Bold
Italic
Subscript: H₂O
Superscript: Fe³⁺

Section 1 The Role of Pleiotropy

Pleiotropy plays a significant role in the regressive evolution of eyes in cave-dwelling organisms, including mollies and Astyanax cavefish. Pleiotropy refers to a single gene influencing multiple traits, often resulting in evolutionary trade-offs. In cavefish, for example, genes associated with eye development also affect other traits critical for survival in the dark. One prominent gene implicated in this process is the Hedgehog (Hh) gene. Its altered expression not only reduces eye size but also increases taste bud density, which improves the fish's ability to detect food in nutrient-scarce cave environments.

Gene mapping of Mexican Astyanax reveals that three distinct genes across separate chromosomes influence eye development. Notably, one of these genes is closely associated with a gene regulating metabolic rate. This genetic linkage suggests that mutations enhancing metabolism might simultaneously impair eye development, providing evidence that pleiotropy may drive the regressive evolution of cavefish eyes. (reference)

Similarly, changes in jaw morphology and olfactory structures, likely linked to pleiotropic effects, further highlight the adaptive benefits of traits compensating for the loss of vision. For instance, mutations that impair eye development may also enhance the width of the olfactory pit, illustrating how natural selection can indirectly favor the loss of eyes through benefits to other systems.The absence of eyes also causes morphological changes that indirectly benefit cavefish. The bones surrounding the eye socket are repurposed, deforming the skull in ways that enhance other senses such as olfactory perception. Blind cavefish exhibit a 13% increase in the width of the olfactory pit, enlarging the surface area of the olfactory epithelium. This adaptation improves their sense of smell, enabling them to detect chemical cues, food in their environment more effectively. The deformation of the skull due to eye loss results in broader nasal structures, further increasing olfactory efficiency.

Call out each figure by number (Fig. 1).

Sample citations:

A citation code consists of a hyperlinked reference within "ref" begin and end codes.

For multiple use of the same inline citation or footnote, you can use the named references feature, choosing a name to identify the inline citation, and typing

Second citation of Ref 1:

Here we cite April Murphy's paper on microbiomes of the Kokosing river.

Section 2 Microbiome

Include some current research, with a second image.

Here we cite Murphy's microbiome research again.

Conclusion

You may have a short concluding section. Overall, cite at least 5 references under References section.

References

Edited by [Amadou Diop], student of Joan Slonczewski for BIOL 116, 2024, Kenyon College.