Tea Tree Oil Treatment of MRSA
Methicillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus (MRSA) is a public health problem. The prevalence of MRSA as a pathogen in hospitals and other community settings underscores the importance of eradicating the carriers. As MRSA is not susceptible to commonly used antibiotics, alternative antimicrobial agents are being sought for its treatment. One area of interest involves the use of plant essential oils. Studies indicate the effectiveness of tea tree oil as treatment for infections of drug-resistant bacteria, including MRSA.
Staphyloccocus aureus, more commonly known as staph bacteria or MRSA, is a Gram-positive coccus-shaped anaerobic bacterium.1 MRSA is a type of staph bacteria that is resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics, such as penicillin, amoxicillin, oxacillin, and methicillin. MRSA often colonizes on the skin or nostrils of healthy individuals, and is relatively harmless at these sites.1 If S. aureus enters the body (e.g., wounds, cuts), it may cause infections. In such instances, the MRSA infection may range from mild (e.g., pimples)to life-threatening (e.g., infection of bloodstream, joints, or bones). MRSA is spread through contact and most commonly contracted in public settings, namely hospitals.
Tea tree oil (TTO) is the essential oil derived through steam distillation from the Australian native plant Melaleuca alternifolia. Tea tree oil has been used for centuries as a topical antiseptic. TTO has antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory properties in vitro.2 Although historical anecdotes endorse TTO's medicinal properties, few clinical studies have been conducted to support such claims. Clinical studies, however few, indicate that tea tree oil can treat skin infection caused by MRSA. Tea tree oil's anti-microbial properties are attributed to its composition of a chemical class known as terpenes, specifically terpinen-4-ol.2 Tea tree oil's bacteriocidal and bacteriostatic effects make this plant extract a plausible addition or supplement to a MRSA treatment plan.
Tea Tree Oil Composition and Chemistry
Commercially available tea tree oil (TTO) is a composition of nearly 100 chemical compounds determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.1 TTO is primarily composed of a class of chemicals called terpenes. Specifically, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and other terpene alcohols dominate this composition. Terpenes are volatile, aromatic hydrocarbons and are typically soluble with nonpolar solvents.2 While research indicates that terpene alcohols are generally effective anti-microbial agents, terpinen-4-ol is the specific terpenic compound believed primarily responsible for TTO's anti-microbial activity.2
TTO composition is internationally regulated and may be commercially available in various chemotypes, including the terpinen-4-ol chemotype where terpinen-4-ol comprises between 30 to 40% of TTO's commercial composition.2 International regulation of TTO's chemical properties calls for this relatively high composition of terpinen-4-ol in commercial production due to its historical medicinal properties. Other terpenic compounds in TTO include 1,8-cineole, terpinolene, and α-terpineol.3 These compounds also have medicinal properties that are less reputable than those of terpinen-4-ol.
Topical Treatment and Effectiveness
Tea tree oil (TTO) is reported to have antimicrobial activity. TTO may be included in commercial products, such as body wash, skin cream, and nasal ointment. Such products can be used as a daily regimen to treat MRSA. The clinical efficacy of TTO body wash and creams as a decolonization agent for MRSA has been supported, albeit with no statistical significance. Researchers have found that TTO can reduce or prevent MRSA colonization as well as the standard treatment. The following studies indicate the potential usefulness of tea tree oil in eradicating MRSA and suggest that TTO may supplement a MRSA eradication regimen.
Caelli et al.'s (2000) pilot study study compared the effectiveness of TTO to that of routine care treatments, as measured by survivor MRSA concentrations on the skin and within the nose.4 In the Caelli Lab's clinical study, 30 MRSA-affected adult hospital inpatients were randomly assigned to receive either the routine care (2% mupirocin nasal ointment and triclosan body wash) or tea tree oil regimen (4% TTO nasal ointment and 5% TTO body wash) for at least three days. Caelli et al. found that the tea tree oil regimen performed better (i.e., reduced or eradicated MRSA) in more subjects than the routine regimen, although these results were not statistically significant due to small sample size.
A similar study conducted by Blackwood et al. (2013) also found inconclusive results with 445 patients belonging to two intensive care units (ICU) in Northern Ireland.5 The Thompson Lab sought to determine whether the daily use of TTO body wash had a lower incidence of MRSA colonization. A randomized regimen of either Johnson's Baby Softwash (standard care) body wash or tea tree oil (5%) body wash was assigned to each patient. Patients continued treatment until they reached the study endpoints: detection of hospital-acquired MRSA, ICU discharge, or death. Thompson et al. reported that the TTO regimen did not significantly reduce new MRSA colonization in ICU patients, but claimed that TTO was safe and well-tolerated among patients.
Even though TTO does not seem to be any stronger than the standard decolonization agent for MRSA, it can be more effective at clearing some of its symptoms. Dryden et al. (2004) deemed it to be sufficiently effective, safe, and well-tolerated to be considered part of a MRSA eradication regimen.6 They found that 5% TTO body wash and 10% TTO applied to skin and nose three times a day for five days and tea tree was more effective than standard treatment at clearing skin lesions, variations in skin texture or color, associated with MRSA.
[[<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/zajanatural/2522886655/" title="tea tree by ZAJA Natural & The Beer Soap Company, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2287/2522886655_139f286dc3.jpg" width="500" height="375" alt="tea tree"></a>]]
Antimicrobial Activity: Cytoplasmic Membrane Damage
TTO is reported to disrupt S. aureus cell's membrane permeability. Researchers, Cox et al and Carson et al, examined TTO's effect on S. aureus physiology and found damage to the cytoplasmic membrane. A weakened barrier may allow for undesirable passage of material, such as ions or toxins, and potentially result in bacteriocide or bacteriostasis. The following studies examined the cytoplasmic membrane damage that TTO induces in MRSA.
Cox, S. D. et al (2000) found that exposure of MRSA to the minimum inhibitory concentration of TTO altered cell membrane structure.7 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is the lowest concentration of antimicrobial - in this case, TTO - that will inhibit microbial growth. Cox et al accumulated evidence of cell membrane damage from a propidium iodide uptake assay and ion leakage measurements. As expected, cells that were not exposed to TTO displayed an intact cell membrane. Propidium iodide, a fluorescent nucleic acid staining solution, did not penetrate cells that were not exposed to TTO. Likewise, cells not exposed to TTO showed little potassium ion leakage. This showed that physiologically normal S. aureus cells would not uptake propidium iodide or leak potassium.
From the experiment, Cox et al found that TTO exposure resulted in propidium iodide uptake and potassium ion leakage, signs of a damaged cytoplasmic membrane.7 In particular, they observed that exposing cell suspensions of MRSA to the minimal inhibitory concentration of 0.25% (v/v) tea tree oil for 30 minutes increased cell permeability to propidium iodide relative to the controls. They also demonstrated that 30 minutes of exposure to TTO caused up to 20% cellular loss of potassium ions. They proposed that TTO components diffused through the cell wall and disrupted the phospholipid regions of cell membrane structures. The ensuing passage of propidium iodide and potassium ions indicated severe cytoplasmic membrane damage.
Carson, C. et al (2002) demonstrated cytoplasmic membrane damage through increased susceptibility to NaCl, loss of cytoplasmic material, and the formation of mesosomes in MRSA treated by TTO or one of its components: terpinen-4-ol, α-terpineol, 1,8-cineole.8 MRSA cells treated with TTO or one of its components were found to be more susceptible to salt solution or sodium chloride (NaCl), a bacterial cell toxin. Treatment with TTO or its components reduced survivor colonies to <30% viability on NaCl-treated plates compared to ..... . This evidence led Carson et al to propose that the treatment likely damaged the S. aureus cell membrane and affected the bacterial cell's ability to exclude NaCl. Electron microscopy of terpinen-4-ol treated MRSA cells showed mesosome formation that was not observed in untreated cells. Mesosomes, invaginations of the cytoplasmic membrane, along with loss of cytoplasmic material, suggested that the TTO and its components compromised the S. aureus membrane.
Both Cox et al and Carson et al performed different experiments to demonstrate TTO's devastating effect on the S. aureus cytoplasmic membrane. While much of TTO's mechanism remains unexplored, these studies indicate that TTO targets the cytoplasmic membrane.
Susceptibility to Antibiotic Resistance after TTO Exposure
There is concern that commercial TTO preparations, which may vary in its components' concentrations, provide users more opportunity to apply sub-lethal concentrations and lead to reduced antimicrobial susceptibility. McMahon et al (2007) and McMahon et al (2008) suggest that exposure of MRSA to sub-lethal TTO concentrations, defined as half of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), makes MRSA less susceptible to antibiotics.9, 10 Recent research indicates otherwise. Hammer et al (2013) and Thomsen et al (2012) suggest that while the MIC for antibiotics might increase post-TTO habituation, such results are statistically not significant.11, 12 They allege that habitation of MRSA in sub-lethal TTO concentration does not significantly reduce its susceptibility to antibiotics.
Two studies by the McMahon Lab suggested that exposure of MRSA to sub-lethal concentration of TTO was associated with decreased susceptibility to antibiotics.9, 10 McMahon et al supported these claims by demonstrating that the effective MIC of TTO-habituated MRSA for 7 out of 10 tested antibiotics increased at least 2-fold from the baseline after a 72 h habituation to sub-lethal TTO concentrations. They suggested that, even though TTO was an effective treatment for MRSA at relatively low concentrations (0.25%-0.50%), repeated TTO use at sub-lethal concentrations could reduce susceptibility to antibiotics.
Hammer et al (2013) and Thomsen et al performed a similar investigation, but reported a different outcome. Despite using similar parameters as in the McMahon Lab's experiments, they were unable to reproduce the published results.11, 12 Instead, they found minor increases and decreases in MIC after TTO habituation. Hammer et al (2013) and Thomsen et al disputed the McMahon Lab's results and strongly claimed that tea tree oil did not induce resistance to itself or other antimicrobials.
Conclusion
Discovering alternative therapy for the treatment of MRSA is very important as antibiotic resistance becomes more prevalent. One such alternative treatment is the use of tea tree oil as an antimicrobial.
TTO's chemical composition of terpenic derivatives contributes to its antimicrobial activity. Its primary terpenic component, terpinen-4-ol, has been investigated as an antimicrobial agent.2 Carson, C. et al (2002) also demonstrated the antimicrobial activity of 1,8-cineole and α-terpineol, two other terpenic derivatives found in TTO.4
A TTO regimen has been found to be at least as effective as standard MRSA treatment in eradicating MRSA. This is grounds for supplementing a MRSA treatment plan with TTO in some form, such as body wash, nasal ointment, or skin cream.
The mechanism of TTO's cidal effects is reported to damage the S. aureus cytoplasmic membrane. Cox et al showed that TTO caused propidium iodide uptake and potassium ion leakage to the external environment, both of which should not occur within normal S. aureus cells.7 Carson et al showed that TTO induced NaCl toxin uptake, which would normally be excluded from the cell.8 These results led to the proposal that TTO damaged the permeability barrier of the cytoplasmic membrane, thus allowing for the unnatural passage of certain material.
Exposure to sub-lethal concentrations of TTO has also been reported to decrease susceptibility to antibiotics.9, 10 However, these results have been disputed.11, 12
Current research focuses on TTO's mechanism of action, safety, and effect on antimicrobial susceptibility. Though cytoplasmic membrane damage is believed to be the major bacteriocidal effect, the mechanism is still largely unexplored. Current research focuses on commercial tea tree oil's cytotoxicity if applied topically to human skin. Such investigation would determine the safety of applying TTO on a regular basis. Ongoing research also investigates whether or not exposure to sub-inhibitory concentrations of TTO will lead to reduced antimicrobial susceptibility.
References
1. National Health Service (NHS). "MRSA Infection" NHS Choices 23/09/2011 Published. Web. 21/03/2013 Accessed. <http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/MRSA/Pages/Introduction.aspx>
Edited by Karen Leung, a student of Nora Sullivan in BIOL187S (Microbial Life) in The Keck Science Department of the Claremont Colleges Spring 2013.
