Citricoccus nitrophenolicus

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
Revision as of 19:12, 3 May 2013 by Chris534 (talk | contribs)

Classification

Kingdom - Bacteria

Phylum - Actinobacteria

Class - Actinobacteridae

Order - Actinomycetales

Family - Micrococcineae

Genus - Micrococcaceae


Species

NCBI: Taxonomy

Citricoccus nitrophenolicus


Genome Structure

Describe the size and content of the genome. How many chromosomes? Circular or linear? Other interesting features? What is known about its sequence?

Metabolism and Life Cycle

C. nitrophenolicus is a strict aerobe and grows best with pNP as its sole carbon, electron and energy source. Although the favored food source was pNP, growth was also observed when food sources such as short chain fatty acids, salicylate and a range of alcohols such as phenols and 4-cholorphenols were present. All these served as electron donors for growth.

- When pNP was used as the only source of carbon and energy: Metabolism of pNP resulted in the release of nitrite

- When incubated with pNP and acetate: pNP was metabolized first and then acetate

- When grown solely on acetate: Both nitrite and nitrate served as oxygen sources where nitrate was quickly reduced to nitrite and therefore quickly accumulated in cultures during aerobic growth.


Ecology and Pathogenesis

pNP is a a highly stable compound found mainly in pesticides. Being highly stable, pNP is therefore highly soluble in water, thus easily penetrating the soil and polluting the environment. pNP is also listed as a "priority pollutant" on the US Environmental Protection Agency's List.


Case Study: Breakwater 42, Denmark

Problem: Parathions, a main pollutants of the Breakwater 42 waste dump, situated on a beach in North Western Denmark, leaked and polluted the beach and a near by bird sanctuary.

Efforts taken: 2 previous remediation efforts have excavated and the following was found: ~6,000 tonnes of pollution and contaminated sand ~270 tonnes of pollution is still located underground, in an estimated volume of 90,000m3, out of which parathions constitute ~225 tonnes of the pollution bound to the soil.


Treating the remaining pollution: - Combination of alkaline hydrolysis and bioremediation --> Implementing both at the same time is bound to have a faster effect and more efficient removal

-Alkaline hydrolysis will raise the pH to 11-12 --> Thereby converting many complex toxic substances to smaller, less toxic substances ---> For example: pNP, a product of alkaline hydrolysis of parathions, is x1000 times more soluble than parathions

- Bioremediation by either in situ or ex situ -->In situ: biostimulation or bioaugmentation -->Ex situ: pumping hydrolyzed chemicals into a bioreactor

C. nitrophenolicus Role:

- Due to the high pH post alkaline hydrolysis, it is desirable to find bacteria that can degrade chemicals at such high pH, thus reducing costs of neutralization

- Due to it ability to degrade pNP and degrade it at pH values between 6.8 – 10 C. nitrophenolicus is the ideal microbe.

Problem: - The pH levels post alkaline hydrolysis is between 11 and 12 Citricoccus nitrophenolicus can do the job, it just takes longer At pH of 10 it takes 3 times longer to degrade pNP than at pH 8! And resulted in a lower growth yield Solution: use of small volumes of acid to adjust to desirable pH


References

[Sample reference] Takai, K., Sugai, A., Itoh, T., and Horikoshi, K. "Palaeococcus ferrophilus gen. nov., sp. nov., a barophilic, hyperthermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2000. Volume 50. p. 489-500.



http://ijsb.sgmjournals.org/content/49/3/1157.full.pdf+html [This is where I found all the above info, I will properly cite within the next day or two]


Author

Page authored by Cheryl Christie and Neha Rao, student of Prof. Jay Lennon at Michigan State University.

<-- Do not remove this line-->