Candidatus Carsonella ruddii: Difference between revisions

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Uncurated}}
Candidatus Carsonella ruddii
Candidatus Carsonella ruddii


Classification
Classification
Higher Order Taxa: Bacteria (Domain); Proteobacteria (Phylum); Gamma proteobacteria (Class); Unclassified Gamma proteobacteria (Order); Candidatus Carsonella (Genus); C. C. ruddii (Species)
Higher Order Taxa: Bacteria (Domain); Proteobacteria (Phylum); Gamma proteobacteria (Class); Unclassified Gamma proteobacteria (Order); Candidatus Carsonella (Genus); C. C. ruddii (Species)
Species: Candidatus Carsonella ruddii
Species: Candidatus Carsonella ruddii
 
C. C. ruddii got its name from two well-known naturalists.  Carsonella came from a revolutionary American environmentalist, Rachel Carson, best known for her groundbreaking work decades ago, Silent Sping; ruddii is named after another American naturalist, Robert L. Rudd.
C. C. ruddii got its name from well-known naturalists.  Carsonella came from a revolutionary American environmentalist, Rachel Carson, best known for her groundbreaking work decades ago, Silent Sping; ruddii is named after another American naturalist, Robert L. Rudd.
 


Description and Significance
Description and Significance
 
C. C. ruddii is a gram-negative, primary obligate symbiont of psyllids (jumping plant lice), particularly Pachpsylla venusta.  This microorganism has the smallest genome known. There is much controversy over whether this is a living cell or simply an organelle as it is missing genes needed for living independently.   
C. C. ruddii is a gram-negative, primary obligate symbiont of psyllids, particularly Pachpsylla venusta.  This microorganism has the smallest genome known. There is much controversy over whether this is a living cell or simply an organelle as it is missing genes needed for living independently.   
 


Genome Structure
Genome Structure
 
C. C. ruddii has the smallest known cellular genome sequenced to date.  The circular genome was finished on October 21, 2006 by groups in Japan and the University of Arizona.  It was found to be only 159,662 base pairs (Tamames) compared this with the genome of Mycoplasma genitalium, the smallest free-living genome, with about 580,000 bp.  An estimated 93-97% of the genome is coding, including 213 genes with 182 of these coding for protein.  These genes tend to overlap (much more than is common in bacteria) and are smaller than what is expected of bacteria in general.   The remaining 7% non-coding part contains no pseudogenes and no phage sequences. The C. C. ruddii genome has a 19.9% GC content, which is extremely low.  This results in a significant  AT bias which is not generally observed in their free living counterparts. This bias is likely due to deleterious mutations caused by genetic drift because of small population sizes and not much recombination. (Tamames)
C. C. ruddii has the smallest known cellular genome.  The circular genome was finished being sequenced on October 21, 2006 and was found to be only 159,662 base pairs.  Because of the genome size, 93% is coding including 213 genes with 182 of those being protein coding.  These genes tend to overlap and are smaller than what is expected of bacteria. Out of the 7% non-coding, there are no pseudogenes and contains no phage sequences.   It has a GC content of 19.9%, which is extremely low.  This low GC content concludes an AT bias which is not generally observed in their free living counterparts. It is likely due to deleterious mutations caused by genetic drift because of small population sizes and not much recombination.
Because there are so few genes, there is debate as to whether C. C. ruddii is an actual living cell.  It has been determined that it is a living organism simply in a symbiotic relationship with its host.  The organism has apparently retained only those genes necessary for essential living functions and those that are beneficial to the host’s fitness.  However, the C. C. ruddii genome appears to be missing some important genes such as that for gyrase, ligase, RNAse HI, as well as histone-like and single stranded-binding proteins; making its genome insufficient to replicate, transcribe and synthesize proteins.  The genes for helicase and primase are too degraded for use.  The gene believed to be the signal factor subunit is also highly degraded, making the only available transcription machinery that of the core subunits of the RNA polymerase.  The translation machinery is also affected, being limited to only minimal RNA genes, three rRNA and 28 tRNA genes, which are required for protein synthesis.  The ability to make working ribosomes is also under question since nine aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and 15 ribosomal protein components, as well as proteins required for ribosome maturation, are either not functional or completely missing.  C. C. ruddii also lacks genes involved in energy metabolism and membrane synthesis.  Some translation factors, such as elongation factors P and T, are also missing.  Although many genes are missing, C. C. ruddii does retain genes to carry out reproduction and cellular maintenance, which are necessary functions for life. (Tamames)
Because there are so few genes, there were doubts if C. C. ruddii was an actual living cell.  It has been determined that is a living organism simply in a symbiotic relationship with its host, and the genes that are coded for by the organism are those necessary for essential living functions and those that are beneficial to the host’s fitness.  The C. C. ruddii genome appears to be missing some important genes such as that for gyrase, ligase, RNAse HI, as well as histone-like and single stranded-binding proteins; making its genome insufficient to replicate, transcribe and synthesize proteins.  The genes for helicase and primase are too degraded for use.  The gene believed to be the signal factor subunit is also highly degraded, making the only available transcription machinery that of the core subunits of the RNA polymerase.  The translation machinery is also affected, being limited by only minimal RNA genes, three rRNA and 28 tRNA genes, that are required for protein synthesis.  The ability to make working ribosomes is also under question since 9 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and 15 ribosomal protein components are not functional or completely missing, as well as proteins required for ribosome maturation.  Some translation factors are also missing like elongation factors P and T.  Although many genes are missing, C. C. ruddii still has genes to carry out reproduction and maintenance, which are necessary functions for life.
 


Cell Structure and Metabolism
Cell Structure and Metabolism
 
As an obligate endosymbiont to Pachypsylla venusta, C. C. ruddii relies on its host for survival, and the insect relies on its endosymbionts as wellSince the psyllids feed exclusively on plant sap, which lacks many important nutrients, the endosymbiont provides essential nutrients needed by the host. This symbiotic relationship works so well that the use of antibiotics to rid the insect of its endosymbionts yields devastating outcomes for the development, reproduction, and survival of the insect.
As an obligate endosymbiont to Pachypsylla venusta, C. C. ruddii must rely on its host.  The psyllids feed on plant sap, which lacks certain nutrients. The endosymbiont provides essential nutrients the host needs and is not getting from the plant sap.
This relationship works so well that in studies when antibiotics are used to rid the insect of that endosymbiont, this yields devastating outcomes for the development, reproduction, and survival of the insect.
 


Ecology
Ecology
 
C. C. ruddii live inside the body cavity of psyllids, insects which feed on plant sap. They are found in specialized host cells called bacteriocytes. A collection of bacteriocytes makes a bacteriome. The symbiosis is mutually beneficial as the microorganism receives food and shelter from the insect and the insect receives amino acids and other nutrients it is not getting from its diet, or is not capable of synthesizing for itself.   
C. C. ruddii live inside the body cavity of psyllids, insects which feed on plant sap. They are found in specialized host cells called bacteriocytes. A collection of bacteriocytes makes a bacteriome. The symbiosis is mutually beneficial as the microorganism receives food and basic living from the insect and the insect receives amino acids it is not capable of making itself.   
 


Pathology
Pathology
C. C. ruddii is an obligate endosymbiont to the insects psyllids, particularly Pachypsylla venusta.  However, they are not known to be disease-causing.  
C. C. ruddii is an obligate endosymbiont to the insects psyllids, particularly Pachypsylla venusta.  However, they are not known to be disease-causing.  
Application to Biotechnology
Application to Biotechnology
C. C. ruddii is an endosymbiont, therefore disruption of this organism could lead to its use as a potential method of pest control (controlling psyllid populations).  This may be a reason for its being named after naturalists who both wrote important books on pesticides and the environment.
C. C. ruddii is an endosymbiont, therefore disruption of this organism could lead to its use as a potential method for pest control (controlling psyllid populations).  This may be one of the reasons for its being named after naturalists who both wrote important books on pesticides and the environment.
 


Current Research
Current Research
 
Much of the research on this organism centers on the question of whether it is a true bacteria or an organelle.  Hencem studying this organism may give insights into the process of endosymbiosis and allow us to examine the steps that led to the formation of mitochondria and chloroplasts in eukaryotic cells.  Also, it has played a significant part in a study of genomic analysis.  Relying on its characteristic low GC content, scientists were able to find a new approach to isolating DNA of endosymbionts.  Usually, isolating endosymbiont DNA is difficult because of the low amount of DNA from the microorganism and the especially high possibility for host DNA contamination.  Tried methods included density gradient centrifugation and dissecting out the endosymbionts. Endosymbionts and bacteria that live in mixed populations are difficult to isolate for DNA analysis. This new method was devised to recover endosymbiont in an effective way.
The most recent study was in 2007, on the subject of whether the microorganism was an actual living cell or an organelle.  Also, it has played a significant part in a study of genomic analysis.  Relying on its characteristic low GC content, scientists were able to find a new approach of isolating DNA of endosymbionts.  Usually, isolating endosymbiont DNA is difficult because of the low amount DNA from the microorganism and the especially high possibility for host DNA contamination.  Tried methods included density gradient centrifugation and dissecting out the endosymbionts. Endosymbionts and bacteria that live in mixed populations are difficult to isolate for DNA analysis. This new method was devised to recover endosymbiont in an effective way.
 


References
References
"Carsonella ruddii." Uniprot. 9 Dec 2008 <http://www.uniprot.org/taxonomy/114186>.  
"Carsonella ruddii." Uniprot. 9 Dec 2008 <http://www.uniprot.org/taxonomy/114186>.  
Dale, Colin. "Extracting single genomes from heterogenous DNA samples." PubMed. 5 Dec 2008  
Dale, Colin. "Extracting single genomes from heterogenous DNA samples." PubMed. 5 Dec 2008  

Latest revision as of 19:39, 3 September 2010

This student page has not been curated.

Candidatus Carsonella ruddii

Classification Higher Order Taxa: Bacteria (Domain); Proteobacteria (Phylum); Gamma proteobacteria (Class); Unclassified Gamma proteobacteria (Order); Candidatus Carsonella (Genus); C. C. ruddii (Species) Species: Candidatus Carsonella ruddii C. C. ruddii got its name from two well-known naturalists. Carsonella came from a revolutionary American environmentalist, Rachel Carson, best known for her groundbreaking work decades ago, Silent Sping; ruddii is named after another American naturalist, Robert L. Rudd.

Description and Significance C. C. ruddii is a gram-negative, primary obligate symbiont of psyllids (jumping plant lice), particularly Pachpsylla venusta. This microorganism has the smallest genome known. There is much controversy over whether this is a living cell or simply an organelle as it is missing genes needed for living independently.

Genome Structure C. C. ruddii has the smallest known cellular genome sequenced to date. The circular genome was finished on October 21, 2006 by groups in Japan and the University of Arizona. It was found to be only 159,662 base pairs (Tamames) compared this with the genome of Mycoplasma genitalium, the smallest free-living genome, with about 580,000 bp. An estimated 93-97% of the genome is coding, including 213 genes with 182 of these coding for protein. These genes tend to overlap (much more than is common in bacteria) and are smaller than what is expected of bacteria in general. The remaining 7% non-coding part contains no pseudogenes and no phage sequences. The C. C. ruddii genome has a 19.9% GC content, which is extremely low. This results in a significant AT bias which is not generally observed in their free living counterparts. This bias is likely due to deleterious mutations caused by genetic drift because of small population sizes and not much recombination. (Tamames) Because there are so few genes, there is debate as to whether C. C. ruddii is an actual living cell. It has been determined that it is a living organism simply in a symbiotic relationship with its host. The organism has apparently retained only those genes necessary for essential living functions and those that are beneficial to the host’s fitness. However, the C. C. ruddii genome appears to be missing some important genes such as that for gyrase, ligase, RNAse HI, as well as histone-like and single stranded-binding proteins; making its genome insufficient to replicate, transcribe and synthesize proteins. The genes for helicase and primase are too degraded for use. The gene believed to be the signal factor subunit is also highly degraded, making the only available transcription machinery that of the core subunits of the RNA polymerase. The translation machinery is also affected, being limited to only minimal RNA genes, three rRNA and 28 tRNA genes, which are required for protein synthesis. The ability to make working ribosomes is also under question since nine aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and 15 ribosomal protein components, as well as proteins required for ribosome maturation, are either not functional or completely missing. C. C. ruddii also lacks genes involved in energy metabolism and membrane synthesis. Some translation factors, such as elongation factors P and T, are also missing. Although many genes are missing, C. C. ruddii does retain genes to carry out reproduction and cellular maintenance, which are necessary functions for life. (Tamames)

Cell Structure and Metabolism As an obligate endosymbiont to Pachypsylla venusta, C. C. ruddii relies on its host for survival, and the insect relies on its endosymbionts as well. Since the psyllids feed exclusively on plant sap, which lacks many important nutrients, the endosymbiont provides essential nutrients needed by the host. This symbiotic relationship works so well that the use of antibiotics to rid the insect of its endosymbionts yields devastating outcomes for the development, reproduction, and survival of the insect.

Ecology C. C. ruddii live inside the body cavity of psyllids, insects which feed on plant sap. They are found in specialized host cells called bacteriocytes. A collection of bacteriocytes makes a bacteriome. The symbiosis is mutually beneficial as the microorganism receives food and shelter from the insect and the insect receives amino acids and other nutrients it is not getting from its diet, or is not capable of synthesizing for itself.

Pathology C. C. ruddii is an obligate endosymbiont to the insects psyllids, particularly Pachypsylla venusta. However, they are not known to be disease-causing. Application to Biotechnology C. C. ruddii is an endosymbiont, therefore disruption of this organism could lead to its use as a potential method for pest control (controlling psyllid populations). This may be one of the reasons for its being named after naturalists who both wrote important books on pesticides and the environment.

Current Research Much of the research on this organism centers on the question of whether it is a true bacteria or an organelle. Hencem studying this organism may give insights into the process of endosymbiosis and allow us to examine the steps that led to the formation of mitochondria and chloroplasts in eukaryotic cells. Also, it has played a significant part in a study of genomic analysis. Relying on its characteristic low GC content, scientists were able to find a new approach to isolating DNA of endosymbionts. Usually, isolating endosymbiont DNA is difficult because of the low amount of DNA from the microorganism and the especially high possibility for host DNA contamination. Tried methods included density gradient centrifugation and dissecting out the endosymbionts. Endosymbionts and bacteria that live in mixed populations are difficult to isolate for DNA analysis. This new method was devised to recover endosymbiont in an effective way.

References "Carsonella ruddii." Uniprot. 9 Dec 2008 <http://www.uniprot.org/taxonomy/114186>. Dale, Colin. "Extracting single genomes from heterogenous DNA samples." PubMed. 5 Dec 2008 <http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1283884>. Douglas, Angela. "Symbiotic Microorganisms: Untapped Resources for Insect Pest Control." Science Direct. 18 June 2007. 5 Dec 2008 <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TCW-4P0N8TS- 2&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1 &_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=f135b32a2e635cd117752f0c05c8078b>. "Genome Project Result." NCBI. 9 Dec 2008 <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=genomeprj&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Overview&list _uids=17977>. Moran, et al. "The players in a mutualistic symbiosis: Insects, bacteria, viruses, and virulence genes." Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 22 November 2005. <http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1287993> Minkel, JR. "Tiny Genome May Reflect Organelle in the Making." Scientific America. 12 October 2006. 9 Dec 2008 <http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=tiny-genome-may-reflect-o>. Nakabachi, Atsushi. "Researchers Find Smallest Cellular Genome." Innovations Report. 13 October 2006. 9 Dec 2008 <http://www.innovations-report.com/html/reports/life_sciences/report- 72018.html>. Tamames, Javier. "The Frontier Between Cell and Organelle." BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2007. PubMed Central. 5 Dec 2008 <http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2175510>. Thao, MyLo. "Cospeciation of Psyllids and Their Primary Prokaryotic Endosymbionts." AEM. 5 Dec 2008 <http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=138992>. Yamishita, A. "Smallest Ever Genome Sequenced." Riken Research. 5 Dec 2008 <http://www.rikenresearch.riken.jp/research/126/>. Zeintz, Evelyn. "Genome Independenc in Insect-Bacterium Symbiosis ." PubMed. 5 Dec 2008 <http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=138992>.