Jamie and Erika's Bacteria: Difference between revisions

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
 
(22 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
Because our PCR and gel electrophoresis were inconclusive, we were not able to perform a BLAST search for our DNA sequence and we are not 100% sure what bacteria it is.
Because our PCR and gel electrophoresis were inconclusive, we were not able to perform a BLAST search for our DNA sequence and we are not 100% sure what bacteria it is.


Our DNA Hydrolysis test was positive (showed clearing) so we can assume that the bacteria contains DNA but we made a mistake during the electrophoresis loading procedures.
From our test results, We can most likely eliminate Streptococcus, Staphlococcus, and Enterobactereae.


===Species===
===Species===
Line 12: Line 15:
|}
|}


''Genus species'' Unknown
''Genus species'': Unknown


==Habitat Information ==
==Habitat Information ==
Describe the location and conditions under which the organism was isolated.
Our organism was found at 30.2370 degrees N, 97.7043 degrees W. according to the grid from NRCS it was found at 3345800 x 624520. It was obtained about an inch and a half from the surface, the soil was dry and grainy. Only a small amount of grass and one tree were close to the collection site.
 
Our soil area was believed to contain Tin clay, Patrick soils, Lewisville silty clay, Houston Black soil, Chaney fine sandy loam and Altoga silty clay.
 
The sample was collected on September 8th of 2017, the temperature was estimated to be between 57 and 84 degrees Farenheit. Humidity was at 54% and 24 hour rainfall was 0.00 inches. The pressure was recorded at 29.87 alt (in) or 1010.4 sea level (m/lb) and solar radiation was 22.45 mj/m2


==Description and Significance==
==Description and Significance==
Describe the appearance (colonial and cellular), possible antimicrobial activity etc. of the organism, and why the organism might be significant.
Cellular Morphology: The bacteria is a Gram-negative bacillus that showed mostly singular bacilli and a few diplobacillus throughout. It is non-motile. Our capsule stain was negative and the Endospore stain was positive.
 
Colony Morphology: The bacteria presented entire margins, creamy white, slightly yellow/tan, opaque, shiny in appearance with no extracellular staining. Isolated colonies were round, moist looking and slightly raised. This bacterium did present a slight odor.
 
The bacteria shoed no sensitivity to Bacitracin or Optichin disks, it grew as normal in the agar. It was also tested for a sensitivity to Axlocillin, Ceftazidines, Ampicillin, Oxacillin, and Vancomycin. Out of these five, only Ceftazidine presented a zone of inhibition to the growth of the bacteria. Vancomycin showed a very slight zone of inhibition, but probably not enough to be significant in fighting the bacteria.


==Genome Structure==
==Genome Structure==
Describe the size and content of the genome. How many chromosomes?  Circular or linear?  Other interesting features?  What is known about its sequence? Include S Ribosomal sequence that you obtained from PCR and sequencing here.
Since our PCR and gel electrophoresis techniqes were inconclusive, we cant be sure what our genome structure consists of. Since it is a bacteria we can assume it would have a circular chromosome.
 
==Cell Structure, Metabolism and Life Cycle==
Since our bacteria was positive for the Oxidase test we can assume it uses the electron transport chain for energy. It also appears to be aerobic.
 
==Physiology and Pathogenesis==
 
Selective Media Test Results:


Hektoen Enteric Agar = Negative / No Growth


==Cell Structure, Metabolism and Life Cycle==
MacConkey Agar = Negative / No Growth
Interesting features of cell structure; how it gains energy; what important molecules it produces.
 
Mannitol Salt Agar = Negative / No Growth
 
6.5% Salt Broth = Negative / No Growth
 
Phenylethyl Alcohol Agar = Negative / No Growth
 
Eosin Methylene Blue Agar = Positive for growth, mucoid pink growth indicates weak lactose fermentation
 
 
Differential Tests:
 
Blood Agar = Gamma Hemolysis (no clearing)
 
Nitrate Reduction = Negative for Nitrate reduction abilities
 
Triple Sugar Iron Agar = No fermentation / No gas production
 
Citrate Test = Negative
 
MR VP = Negative / Negative 
 
Phenol Red Broth =  No fermentation /  No gas
 
Decarboxylation Test = Negative for all three substrates
 
Phenylalanine Deaminase = Negative
 
SIM Test = Negative for motility / Negative for tryptophanase / Negative sulfur reduction
 
Catalase Test = Postive
 
Oxidase Test = Positive
 
Bile Esculine = Positive
 
Gelatin Hydrolysis = Negative
 
Lipid Hydrolysis = Positive
 
Starch Hydrolysis = Negative
 
DNA Hydrolysis = Positive
 
Urea Hydrolysis = Negative


No known enzymes as of now.No known contributions to the environment as of now.


==Physiology and Pathogenesis==
Diseases and symptoms unknown as of right now.
Biochemical characteristics, enzymes made, other characteristics that may be used to identify the organism; contributions to environment (if any).<br>
<br><br>
If relevant, how does this organism cause disease? Human, animal, plant hosts? Virulence factors, as well as patient symptoms.<br><br>


==References==
==References==
[Sample reference] [http://ijs.sgmjournals.org/cgi/reprint/50/2/489 Takai, K., Sugai, A., Itoh, T., and Horikoshi, K. "''Palaeococcus ferrophilus'' gen. nov., sp. nov., a barophilic, hyperthermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney". ''International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology''. 2000. Volume 50. p. 489-500.]
None yet.


==Author==
==Author==
Page authored by _____, student of Prof. Kristine Hollingsworth at Austin Community College.
Page authored by Jamie Powell and Erika Anderson, students of Prof. Kristine Hollingsworth at Austin Community College.


<!-- Do not remove this line-->[[Category:Pages edited by students of Kristine Hollingsworth at Austin Community College]]
<!-- Do not remove this line-->[[Category:Pages edited by students of Kristine Hollingsworth at Austin Community College]]

Latest revision as of 17:48, 4 December 2017

This student page has not been curated.

Classification

Because our PCR and gel electrophoresis were inconclusive, we were not able to perform a BLAST search for our DNA sequence and we are not 100% sure what bacteria it is.

Our DNA Hydrolysis test was positive (showed clearing) so we can assume that the bacteria contains DNA but we made a mistake during the electrophoresis loading procedures.

From our test results, We can most likely eliminate Streptococcus, Staphlococcus, and Enterobactereae.

Species

NCBI: Taxonomy

Genus species: Unknown

Habitat Information

Our organism was found at 30.2370 degrees N, 97.7043 degrees W. according to the grid from NRCS it was found at 3345800 x 624520. It was obtained about an inch and a half from the surface, the soil was dry and grainy. Only a small amount of grass and one tree were close to the collection site.

Our soil area was believed to contain Tin clay, Patrick soils, Lewisville silty clay, Houston Black soil, Chaney fine sandy loam and Altoga silty clay.

The sample was collected on September 8th of 2017, the temperature was estimated to be between 57 and 84 degrees Farenheit. Humidity was at 54% and 24 hour rainfall was 0.00 inches. The pressure was recorded at 29.87 alt (in) or 1010.4 sea level (m/lb) and solar radiation was 22.45 mj/m2

Description and Significance

Cellular Morphology: The bacteria is a Gram-negative bacillus that showed mostly singular bacilli and a few diplobacillus throughout. It is non-motile. Our capsule stain was negative and the Endospore stain was positive.

Colony Morphology: The bacteria presented entire margins, creamy white, slightly yellow/tan, opaque, shiny in appearance with no extracellular staining. Isolated colonies were round, moist looking and slightly raised. This bacterium did present a slight odor.

The bacteria shoed no sensitivity to Bacitracin or Optichin disks, it grew as normal in the agar. It was also tested for a sensitivity to Axlocillin, Ceftazidines, Ampicillin, Oxacillin, and Vancomycin. Out of these five, only Ceftazidine presented a zone of inhibition to the growth of the bacteria. Vancomycin showed a very slight zone of inhibition, but probably not enough to be significant in fighting the bacteria.

Genome Structure

Since our PCR and gel electrophoresis techniqes were inconclusive, we cant be sure what our genome structure consists of. Since it is a bacteria we can assume it would have a circular chromosome.

Cell Structure, Metabolism and Life Cycle

Since our bacteria was positive for the Oxidase test we can assume it uses the electron transport chain for energy. It also appears to be aerobic.

Physiology and Pathogenesis

Selective Media Test Results:

Hektoen Enteric Agar = Negative / No Growth

MacConkey Agar = Negative / No Growth

Mannitol Salt Agar = Negative / No Growth

6.5% Salt Broth = Negative / No Growth

Phenylethyl Alcohol Agar = Negative / No Growth

Eosin Methylene Blue Agar = Positive for growth, mucoid pink growth indicates weak lactose fermentation


Differential Tests:

Blood Agar = Gamma Hemolysis (no clearing)

Nitrate Reduction = Negative for Nitrate reduction abilities

Triple Sugar Iron Agar = No fermentation / No gas production

Citrate Test = Negative

MR VP = Negative / Negative

Phenol Red Broth = No fermentation / No gas

Decarboxylation Test = Negative for all three substrates

Phenylalanine Deaminase = Negative

SIM Test = Negative for motility / Negative for tryptophanase / Negative sulfur reduction

Catalase Test = Postive

Oxidase Test = Positive

Bile Esculine = Positive

Gelatin Hydrolysis = Negative

Lipid Hydrolysis = Positive

Starch Hydrolysis = Negative

DNA Hydrolysis = Positive

Urea Hydrolysis = Negative

No known enzymes as of now.No known contributions to the environment as of now.

Diseases and symptoms unknown as of right now.

References

None yet.

Author

Page authored by Jamie Powell and Erika Anderson, students of Prof. Kristine Hollingsworth at Austin Community College.