From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
Revision as of 04:36, 14 March 2008 by Njblackburn (talk | contribs)

Nice page! One suggestion: under the Microbial energetics section, you say that "a nice summary can be found at:_________" with an image to the side. You might say that the image is the summary, because right now it looks like you forgot to post a link to somewhere.Njblackburn 04:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Also, if you want a numbered list to be a list down the page, rather than in a paragraph, put an extra line between the sentences

1) like

2) this

Njblackburn 04:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I agree!! I aslo added uranium which seems to have an interesting relationship with Iron and nitrateEgrgutierrez 03:12, 14 March 2008 (UTC)----

Wow, your page looks really great! I love the warm and inviting into, and I thought everything was really well written. I don't really have any good suggestions for your group other than one small point: where you have a list of processes in the beginning, you may want to change that to "processes and environments", since you are including hot springs on the list. Otherwise, I think it's perfecto! Heather ---

Leslie, I think its coming together very nicely what do you think .... anything you want me to do?Calgilbert 21:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey Neel: you've got great suggestions...thank-you thank-you!  :) Leslie Peacock 12:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Also the page might benefit from the addition of ecological significance section for this topic. Njppatel 18:26, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Good Idea Njppatel I will look into itCalgilbert 18:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Looks great, i would suggest under the microorganisms involved you add some specific example of organisms involved in geomicrobiologyNjppatel 18:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the sugesttion Njppatel, but i belive there already are some specific examples listedCalgilbert 18:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

I would suggest to put the link to the existing microbe page in wiki, for example Pseudomonas putida. Tantayotai 00:38, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestion I have added the linkCalgilbert 18:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

You don't need to geomicrobiology methods section because those methods are common to all the sections in the wiki, unless you can justify some very specific methods for geomicrobiology itself. Kate Scow

I went ahead and deleted this section.Calgilbert 19:09, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Also I don't know that the category "geomicrobiology habitats" will work well in your section unless you want to do some special environments like hot springs or volcanic soils. Kate Scow

I would suggest organizing the category process by the different elements: e.g. iron, manganese, mercury, selenium sulfur (you don't have to go too far with this, just focus on main ones)

You might want to maintain that type of organization then when you talk about specific organisms OR you can have the organisms as a subcategory under each element. Kate Scow


  • Add new comments to the TOP of the discussion page, so that we have newest comments first.
  • After your comment, type four tilde marks ( ~~~~ ). This displays the time and your user name, so that we can tell who left the comment and when.
  • At the end of your comment, type four hyphens "----" to create a line to separate your comment from the next commentator.
  • Make a note on this page below the comment after you've addressed it. Add the ( ~~~~ ) after your note so we know who addressed the comment. Your note could look something like .. "Good idea, we fixed it.Irina C 23:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)" or "I don't think we need to do this because.. Irina C 23:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)"

Good start - did you look around to see if any microbes that are important to different geomicrobiology processes have pages already?

Irina C 21:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)