The Role of the Vaginal Microbiome in Preterm Birth

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource

Introduction: Preterm birth

Preterm birth is the delivery of newborns before the 37th week of gestation, with most preterm births (>80%) occurring between 32 and 37 weeks.[1] Globally, rates of preterm birth range from 5-18% for 184 countries, amounting to 15 million babies born prematurely each year.[1] In America, preterm birth accounts for 11-12% of American pregnancies[2][3] but with marked disparities in race, occurring in 17.8% of births in African Americans. The rates for both the United States and the world have been increasing for the past several decades.[1][2][4] In the United States, incidence of preterm birth increased 30% from 1981 to 2010.[1]

Causes of Preterm Birth

Figure 1. Infographic of some factors associated with preterm birth, CDC[5][1]

There are two main types of preterm labor: provider-initiated birth, involving elective Cesarean section or induction of labor before term, and spontaneous. The majority (70–75%) of all preterm births are spontaneous.[6] Prior to about 30% of spontaneous preterm births, the fetal membranes rupture, known as preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM).[7]

The causes and mechanisms of spontaneous preterm births are not fully understood; in as many as half of all spontaneous preterm births, the cause remains unknown. Many risk factors have been identified, and preterm birth is likely caused by an interplay of them (Figure 1).[1]

Some risk factors include environmental effects such as exposure to air pollution,[8] and identity factors including education level,[6] socioeconomic status, and maternal age (those younger than 18 or older than 35 have higher risk). Race and ethnicity also play a big role in risk of preterm birth. In 2021, rates of preterm birth were 50% higher for Black women than white women.[5] Maternal health is very important, with inadequate nutrition,[9] and unhealthy Western-style diets,[10] low or high Body Mass Index (BMI), diabetes, chronic hypertension, metabolic and genetic disorders, and other underlying diseases increasing risk of preterm birth.[11] Lifestyle risk factors include excessive physical work or long times spent standing, stress, smoking, alcohol, and drug use during pregnancy.[1] Additionally, factors relating to the pregnancy, including inadequate prenatal care, multiple gestations (twins, triplets, etc.), primiparity (the number of offspring female has borne), and short intervals of time between pregnancies, increase risk of preterm birth.[6][11] The role of infection in preterm birth is being investigated, as intra-amniotic infection is present in one-third of spontaneous preterm births,[6] including malaria, syphilis, HIV, urinary tract infections, and bacterial vaginosis.[1]

Effects of Preterm Birth

The effects of preterm birth are wide-ranging. Babies born prematurely have much higher incidence of disease and death, especially in the month following birth, known as the neonatal period.[6] Preterm birth directly causes 35% of all neonatal deaths.[1] One reason for this is that babies born before term usually do not have fully developed hearts or lungs, resulting in respiratory and cardiovascular complications that often lead to death.[6] Preterm birth also indirectly increases risk of death from other factors, especially infection.[1] Collectively, preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal death,[3] contributing to around 80% of perinatal mortality.[11]

Even if the baby survives the first month, it will likely face many challenges. 50% of neurologic problems reported in this period can be traced to preterm birth.[11] Furthermore, complications, including difficulty gaining weight in infancy,[1] and aforementioned respiratory and cardiovascular disorders, continue to lead to mortality in early childhood. Worldwide, complications from preterm birth remain the leading cause of death for children under five,[7] amounting to over 1 million deaths a year.[1]

Those that survive into adulthood can suffer many significant, long-term impacts, including neuro-developmental and behavioral effects such as anxiety, depression, ADHD, executive functioning disorders, dyslexia, learning disabilities, cerebral palsy, and motor and sensory deficits.[1][7] Hearing impairment and visual impairment including blindness, myopia, and hypermetropia are also frequent, as well as accelerated adolescent weight gain. Cardiovascular and Respiratory disorders can continue to cause problems, including increased blood pressure and chronic lung disease sometimes leading to a requirement for home oxygen.

These effects can all have emotional and economic impacts on the family,[1] as well as leading to significant socioeconomic loss later in life.[6] In addition to socioeconomic loss for individuals, preterm birth incurs high societal costs, estimated at $26.2 billion yearly.[1][2][4]

Vaginal Microbiome

The vaginal canal, and indeed the entire human body, is colonized by diverse microbiota, which both shape and respond to the host environment.[3] Most microbes are not pathogenic, and instead exist in a mutualistic relationship with their human hosts, playing significant roles in immune programming, nutrient acquisition, and protection against pathogens.[3] Microbiomes vary greatly between individuals and over time based on genetics and environmental exposures.[3][12]

Traditionally, it was believed that a “healthy” vaginal microbiome is dominated by Lactobacillus bacteria, which produce lactic acid through anaerobic respiration, keeping vaginal pH between 3.5-4.5.[13] The low pH, competition for space and resources, and the production of bacteriostatic and bacteriocidal compounds helps prevent infections including urinary tract infections, yeast infections, sexually transmitted infections, and HIV infection.[12] Historically, any microbial composition not dominated by Lactobacillus has been deemed not only “unhealthy,” but indicative of a disorder, Bacterial Vaginosis (BV), which is characterized as a “community-wide alteration of the vaginal microbiota”[12] or “the disruption of the equilibrium of the normal vaginal microbiota”.[13] The diagnosis of BV is somewhat subjective,[13] but it typically depends on clue cells, vaginal pH greater than 4.5, and profuse vaginal discharge that has a “fishy odor” when exposed to potassium hydroxide.[13][14] In laboratories and research, a Nugent gram stain score is used for diagnosis, which is generally considered to be more accurate. It assigns numerical values based on bacterial composition, assigning low numbers for Lactobacillus, and higher numbers for other bacteria, with higher results indicating BV.[13]

Figure 2. The microbial composition of each Community State Type (CST), and incidence of preterm birth associated with each. CST 1 is dominated by L. crispatus, CST 2 by L. gasseri, CST 3 by L. iners, CST 5 by L. jensenii, and CST 4 by many different taxa. CST 4 had highest incidence of preterm birth.[3][2]

However, infectious diseases depend as much on the host response as the microbial invasion,[15] and this process of diagnosing BV does not consider the host response. In fact, although the vagina is capable of mounting an inflammatory immune response, as evidenced by its reactions to Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida, BV is not typically associated with any signs of inflammation. Indeed, it has been found that 50% of BV cases are asymptomatic, and attempts at treatment are usually unsuccessful, with a high rate of recurrence.

Further research has characterized the vaginal microbiomes into five Community State Types (CSTs) based on their microbiota composition. Four of the five (CST 1, 2, 3, and 5) are colonized primarily by different varieties of Lactobacillus, while CST 4 is characterized by low levels of Lactobacillus and a diverse array of other anaerobic bacteria.[3][12][13] Interestingly, ethnicity appears to play an important role in microbiome composition, as Black and Hispanic women are more likely to have CST 4 microbiomes, and white and Asian women more likely to have Lactobacillus dominated microbiomes.[13]

Although CST 4, and the microbiomes of Black and Hispanic women, are associated with a higher pH on average, and (perhaps therefore) a greater susceptibility to infection than Lactobacillus dominated microbiomes, at least half the women with this more diverse microbiomes seem to be otherwise healthy.[15] The diagnosis of the infectious disorder Bacterial Vaginosis, which is considered “abnormal” and “unhealthy” depends in large part on the proportion of bacteria that is found less often in Black and Hispanic women, many of whom seem to be “normal” and “healthy” without this bacteria. It appears that BV is over-diagnosed, and what is considered “normal” and “healthy” needs an overhaul.[12][13][15]

The Role of the Vaginal Microbiome in Preterm Birth

The maternal vaginal microbiome appears to play a significant role in the epidemiology of preterm birth.[14] Some sources suggest infection is present in an estimated 25% of all preterm births,[2][3] and 33% of spontaneous preterm births,[6] while other studies suggest that even 40% might be an underestimate, as intrauterine infection is difficult to detect with traditional culture techniques.[14] Infection can come from several sources, but the invading microbes are most commonly from the maternal microbiome,[3] and especially from vaginal infection.[14] Pregnancy is typically associated with a shift towards an even less diverse and more stable vaginal microbiome, with a higher proportion of Lactobacillus,[3] due to the increase in circulating estrogen.[6] Although CST 4 may not indicate a problem normally,[12][13][15] it has been found that the diversity of the vaginal microbiome during pregnancy correlates with preterm birth,[2] and spending time in CST 4 while pregnant is a risk factor for preterm birth.[3] Additionally, BV is associated with a 1.5-3-fold increase in the rate of preterm birth, as well as being associated with many other pregnancy complications.[4]

The exact mechanism by which vaginal infection leads to preterm birth is not fully understood, but it is likely related to where the microbes are and the associated inflammatory response.[14][15] While the microorganisms may have not caused an inflammatory response in the vaginal canal, often they ascend to the uterus and amniotic cavity. There, the microbes may activate a maternal/fetal innate immune response cascade, whereby toll-like receptors recognize the microbes and cause the release of inflammatory cytokines including interleukin 8, interleukin 1β, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Both the pro-inflammatory cytokines and endotoxins produced by the invading microbes can stimulate the production of fetal prostaglandins. Production of prostaglandins leads to uterine contractions, which in term can lead to preterm birth.

The immune response appears to be very important in determining if preterm birth will follow infection, and its mediation is an example of gene-environment interaction. The overproduction of TNF-α, a pro-inflammatory cytokine, has been linked to hyper-responsiveness to infection, sometimes leading to septic shock.[15] Additionally, TNF-α has been shown to stimulate the production of MMPs (which may play a role in membrane rupture) and cervical ripening as well as prostaglandin production. TNF-α production is under genetic control, and several functional polymorphisms have been identified in the promoter region of the TNF-α gene. The so-named TNF-a2 allele results from one such polymorphism at nucleotide 318, and is associated with increased TNF-a production, as well as increased risk of preterm birth when infection is present.[14] A similar gene-environment interaction has been shown with a polymorphism on the Interleukin 6 (IL-6) gene, which encodes for another pro-inflammatory cytokine. Simply carrying the IL-6 allele did not increase risk of preterm-birth, but Black women with the allele who also had BV had twice the risk of preterm birth as those with the allele but without infection.

References

  1. ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 World Health Organization. (2012). Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Hyman, R. W., Fukushima, M., Jiang, H., Fung, E., Rand, L., Johnson, B., ... & Giudice, L. C. (2014). Diversity of the vaginal microbiome correlates with preterm birth. Reproductive sciences, 21(1), 32-40.
  3. ↑ 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 DiGiulio, D. B., Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Costello, E. K., Lyell, D. J., Robaczewska, A., ... & Relman, D. A. (2015). Temporal and spatial variation of the human microbiota during pregnancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(35), 11060-11065
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 White, B. A., Creedon, D. J., Nelson, K. E., & Wilson, B. A. (2011). The vaginal microbiome in health and disease. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 22(10), 389-393.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 CDC Preterm Birth | Maternal and Infant Health | Reproductive Health | CDC. (n.d.). https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pretermbirth.htm.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 Park, S., You, Y. A., Kim, Y. H., Kwon, E., Ansari, A., Kim, S. M., ... & Kim, Y. J. (2022). Ureaplasma and Prevotella Colonization with Lactobacillus Abundance During Pregnancy Facilitates Term Birth.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Brown, R. G., Marchesi, J. R., Lee, Y. S., Smith, A., Lehne, B., Kindinger, L. M., ... & MacIntyre, D. A. (2018). Vaginal dysbiosis increases risk of preterm fetal membrane rupture, neonatal sepsis and is exacerbated by erythromycin. BMC medicine, 16(1), 1-15.
  8. ↑ Trasande, L., Malecha, P., & Attina, T. M. (2016). Particulate matter exposure and preterm birth: estimates of US attributable burden and economic costs. Environmental health perspectives, 124(12), 1913-1918.
  9. ↑ Wang, Z., Zhao, S., Cui, X., Song, Q., Shi, Z., Su, J., & Zang, J. (2021). Effects of dietary patterns during pregnancy on preterm birth: a birth cohort study in Shanghai. Nutrients, 13(7), 2367.
  10. ↑ Chia, A. R., Chen, L. W., Lai, J. S., Wong, C. H., Neelakantan, N., van Dam, R. M., & Chong, M. F. F. (2019). Maternal dietary patterns and birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Advances in Nutrition, 10(4), 685-695.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 Siqueira, F. M., Cota, L. O. M., Costa, J. E., Haddad, J. P. A., Lana, Â. M. Q., & Costa, F. O. (2007). Intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight, and preterm birth: adverse pregnancy outcomes and their association with maternal periodontitis. Journal of periodontology, 78(12), 2266-2276.
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 Ravel, J., Gajer, P., Abdo, Z., Schneider, G. M., Koenig, S. S., McCulle, S. L., ... & Forney, L. J. (2011). Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(supplement_1), 4680-4687.
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 13.7 13.8 Ravel, J., Gajer, P., Abdo, Z., Schneider, G. M., Koenig, S. S., McCulle, S. L., ... & Forney, L. J. (2011). Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(supplement_1), 4680-4687.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 Goldenberg, R. L., Culhane, J. F., Iams, J. D., & Romero, R. (2008). Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. The lancet, 371(9606), 75-84.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 Romero, R., Chaiworapongsa, T., Kuivaniemi, H., & Tromp, G. (2004). Bacterial vaginosis, the inflammatory response and the risk of preterm birth: a role for genetic epidemiology in the prevention of preterm birth. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 190(6), 1509-1519.


Edited by [Elianajoy Volin], student of Joan Slonczewski for BIOL 116 Information in Living Systems, 2022, Kenyon College.

Retrieved from "https://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php?title=The_Role_of_the_Vaginal_Microbiome_in_Preterm_Birth&oldid=158061"