Biophysics of Cell Motility

Introduction

By: Dhruv Kumar Vig

Overview of Cell Motility

Cells are the primary building blocks of all living organisms and at a basic level their functions consist of growing, replicating, and dividing and in order for a cell to complete these functions, they must produce force (Wolgemuth 2011). This force is produced by molecular motors that exist within the cell for example, in our muscles, myosin binds to actin filaments, thereby exerting forces (Wolgemuth 2011). These types of forces are able to be modeled using Brownian motion; however, this kind of modeling fails to address the molecular binding energies that are used by these molecules (Wolgemuth 2011). For instance, the binding and hydrolysis of ATP to a molecule completes a cycle of rotation that generates force; therefore, these molecules can be viewed as motors which can then be described by their force velocity relationship. It is these forces that contribute to the movement of cells movement by gliding, swimming, twitch, or crawling (Wolgemuth 2011).

Figure 1. Rough sketches of microscopic organisms. (a) E. coli, (b) C.crescentus (c) R. sphaeroides (d) Spiroplasma (e)Human spermatozoon (f) Mouse spermatozoon (g) Chlamydomonas (Lauga and Powers 2008).

In terms of cell motility, an organism is defined as a “swimmer” if it moves by creating a periodic change in the shape of its body (Lauga and Powers 2008). Bacteria and Archaebacteria use ionic flux channels to drive their molecular motors that power the motion of their filamentary objects (Wolgemuth 2011). For example, E. coli use flagella that rotate counterclockwise and form bundles in order to push the bacteria forward (Armitage and Schmittt 1997) (Figure 1a). When the bacteria switch to counterclockwise rotation the bundles are broken apart and the cell tumbles (Figure 2b); after the bundles reform the bacteria is facing a new direction in which it can move (Armitage and Schmitt 1997). Calobacter crescentus’ filaments turn a clock wise motion that pushes the bacterium forward, while counter-clockwise motion pulls the bacterium backward (Lauga and Powers 2008) (Figure 1b); Rhodobacter sphaeroides’ filaments only turn one direction (Lauga and Powers 2008) and periodically stop to re-orient itself (Armitage and Schmidt 1997) (Figure 1c and Figure 2a). In a similar manner, Sinorhizobium_meliloti, has several right-handed flagella that allow for quick forward swimming when the flagella form bundles and directional changes in which the flagella rotate at different rates (Figure 2c) (Armitage and Schmidt 1997). Other examples of bacteria with external flagella include sperm that use their flagella to produce a whip-like motion because its molecular motors are present throughout its filament (Figure 1e and 1f) (Lauga and Powers 2008). Furthermore, some bacteria do not need external flagella to move; Spiroplasma, doesn’t have flagella, but instead swims by circulating the kinks that are throughout its body (Figure 1d) (Lauga and Powers 2008).

Spirochetes are a phylum of bacteria that contain internal flagella (Lauga and Powers 2008) that are located within its periplasmic space which lies between the cell wall complex and the bacteria’s outer membrane (Dombrowski et al. 2009). In these bacteria, the flagella extend from each end of the spirochete, thus wrapping around the entire body of the bacteria (Lauga and Powers 2008); this gives the bacteria either a helical or flat wave shape depending in the species (Dombrowksi et al. 2009). Since flagella in spirochetes rotate within its periplasmic space a spirochetes flagella contain both skeletal and motile functions (Dombrowski et al. 2009). The internal flagella allow spirochetes to quickly swim through viscous fluids that normally cause other species of bacteria to slow down; additionally, since their flagella are located internally spirochetes are protected from extreme environmental conditions and some antibiotics (Dombrowski et al. 2009).

Figure 2. Brownian Motion of bacterial swimming.(a) R. sphaeroides, (b) E.coli (c) S. meliloti. The images on the bottom are cartoons which illustrate the physical make up of each of the bacteria represented; the image on the top shows the observed Brownian motion of the swimming bacteria. (Armitage and Schmidt 1997)

Eukaryotes, on the other hand, have larger flagella and cilia than bacteria (Lauga and Powers 2008) and these structures are powered by dynein motors that are located along the length of the filaments (Wolgemuth 2011). Additionally, other organisms have multiple flagella, such as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, an algae that exhibits cilia and flagella beat patterns (Lauga and Powers 2008) and recent studies have shown that is uses a “run and tumble” swimming mechanism that is powered by the oscillations of its flagella (Wolgemuth 2011) (Figure 1g); Paramecium on the other hand uses the coordinated beat patterns of their cilia to move (Figure 1h).

New technological advances in the field microcopy have led an increase in the study and experimentation of cell motility. Brownian motion models are being replaced by more complex physical equations that have been derived to model avenues that range from bacterial turbulence, swarming dynamics and wound healing to Lyme disease.

Technological Advances

Light-microscopy has normally been used to observe and track cells as they are moving. Now, however, fluorescent dyes can be used to stain a bacterium’s flagella, thus illuminating the key cellular structures that are required for a bacterium to swim (Lauga and Powers 2008). Additionally, a technique known as “optical trapping” uses a laser beam to generate a change in momentum in cells that results in generation of force (Koning et al. 1996); measuring this change in force allows for the recording of the interactions between molecules that contain single motor proteins (Nabiev et al. 2008). Atomic force microscopy, on the other hand, can directly measure the force generated by cilia (Lauga and Powers 2008).

Reynolds Number

Equation 1. Reynolds Number. (Happel and Howard 1991)

The world of microscopic organisms involves fluids that are highly viscous in nature and dominate any inertial forces that may be present (Happel and Brenner 1991); therefore, given these conditions the physics that governs the movements of these organisms at a microscopic scale can be described by a low Reynolds Number (Lauga and Powers 2008). The Reynolds Number is a dimensionless quantity that is based on the Navier-Stokes Equation which describes the motion of an incompressible Newtonian fluid. The Reynolds number is the ratio of inertia to viscosity of a fluid (Wolgemuth 2008) and it allows for a qualitative description of the flow regime from the Navier-Stokes equation (Lauga and Powers 2008) (Table 1).

Table 1. Examples of Reynolds numbers for swimming bacteria (Lauga and Powers 2008).

Biophysical Studies

Figure 3. Swarming nature of P. dendritiformis on an agar plate. P. dendritiformis

Swarming Dynamics

Bacterial swarming can contribute the formation of biofilm communities which have been known to cause infections within the human body. These pathogenic bacteria form biofilms during transplant procedure, for example, Proteus mirabilis swarm to form biofilms on urinary catheters which can causes blockages in the catheters and lead to pyelonephritis, septicemia and shock (Sharma and Anand 2002). Bacterial swarming can also produce virulent proteins that can cause kidney infections, wound infections, and possibly cystic fibrosis (Sharma and Anand 2002).

Zhang et al. (2009) studied swarming motion of Paenibacillus dendritiformis colonies on semi-solid agar plates (Figure 6). The scientists were able to measure the speeds of each bacterium and the velocity fields that occur within the bacteria. This allowed them to observe the relationship between the bacteria’s average speed and the length and time scales of the jets that are characteristic of swarming motion (Zhang et al. 2009). Additionally, the scientists observed that as the agar concentration increases the velocity of the bacteria decreases (Figure 7).

Figure 4. Velocity field for bacteria moving at the edge of a growing colony on an agar plate, with the arrows representing the magnitude of the velocity vectors. Additionally, the top-left corner illustrates the relationship between the velocity of the a bacteria movement and agar concentration. (Zhang et al. (2009)

Applications of the Model

While Zhang's et al. (2009) model illustrated the movement of swarming bacteria on agar; their modeled followed the belief that at microscopic levels, the fluid flow which will be highly nature of a viscous solution overwhelms the inertia forces present, thus resulting in a low Reynolds number(Wikipedia: Stokes Flow). There are other factors passed this concept of Stokes Flow that need to be considered, for instance, the collisions between bacteria that occur when swimming bacteria are found in highly dense populations. These types of collisions are identified as "bacterial turbulence" and require a more complex model to accurately reproduce their behavior.

Bacterial Turbulence

Figure 5. Diagram of the forces acting on a rod-shaped bacterium. The bacterium's has a radius of R and length of L. The thrust force that the bacterium's flagella exerts on the environment is defined as F₀ = 2πn_fV₀d and is centered at x_CT. This force is offset by a drag force (F_drag which is centered at x_D. (Wolgemuth 2008)

]

It is suspected that as the concentration of bacteria increases there should be a decrease in the Reynolds number. Since, increasing the concentration of bacteria, increase the fluid flow between neighboring bacteria and this will cause the neighboring bacteria to feel drag due to the velocity difference between each bacterium (Wolgemuth 2008). However, bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis, show an increase in Reynolds number when there bacteria are found in dense colonies (Wolgemuth 2008). In these areas, a jet-like fluid motion is observed that has speeds which are faster than the speed of each bacterium; these jet-like motions are similar to fluid dynamics known as von Karman vortex street, in which the Reynolds number is greater than fifty (Wolgemuth 2008). It is these swimming patterns which have high Reynolds numbers for their fluid dynamics that are known as “bacterial turbulence” (Wolgemuth 2008).

Wolgemuth (2008) developed a two-phase model that analyzed the group swimming dynamics of dense colonies of bacteria i.e. “bacterial turbulence.” Wolgemuth’s model treats the fluid and bacteria independently, and based the model off of rod-like bacteria, like Bacillus subtilis, in which entropic forces will favor the restricted alignment of the bacteria (Wolgemuth 2008) (Figure 3). Wolgemuth (2008) defined a series of equations and parameters that make up his two-phase group swimming model; these parameters reproduce the behavior that is observed in regions that “bacterial turbulence” are present (Figure 4 and 5).

Applications of the Model

Modeling the behavior associated with “bacterial turbulence” has several applications medical and industrial applications. Large concentrations of bacteria are found in filtration systems, like dead-end filtration, in which water containing bacteria are forced through a micro-filter (Wolgemuth 2008). Additionally, biofilms can also be produced by the aggregation of bacteria, thus resulting in corrosion and infections (Wolgeumuth 2008).

Figure 6. Time series that illustrates bacterial turbulence. The color of the map indicates the bacteria's volume fraction, while the arrows represent its fluid velocity. As time increases the fluid velocity field becomes more chaotic and after 9 seconds "turbulent" velocity is observed. (Wolgemuth 2008)

Wound Healing

Figure 7. Diagram illustrating the orientations and forces that are exerted by and onto the cell. (Lee and Wolgemuth 2011).

Epithelial cells have been observed to crawl in order to heal a wound; this crawling is powered by the cell’s actin cytoskeleton (Lee and Wolgemuth 2011). The general process can be broken into three steps, the first requires the polymerization of actin located in the front of the cell. Second, the organism needs to obtain some kind of grip to its surrounding environment, and finally enough force needs to be generated to move the rest of the cell forward (Wolgemuth 2011). Lee and Wolgemuth (2011) studied the possibility that the cellular movement that occurs during wound healing is a mechanical process that is based on cells crawling and not powered by myosin or other biochemical proteins. The scientists developed a model to incorporate the characteristics of single migrating cells and cell-cell adhesions. Their model illustrated that the cells are aligned along a set direction and velocity, and a difference in velocity between neighboring cells can cause viscous stress that produces torque and therefore causes rotational movement between the neighboring cells (Figure 7a). Additionally, based on Newton’s third law of motion, they assumed that a cell which exerts a force on a substrate will experience an equal and opposite force exerted onto it from the substrate. This causes the cell to generate a thrust force that is counteracted by a drag force exerted by the substrate. The result is the production of dipole stress in the cell (Figure 7b).

Figure 8. One-dimensional wound healing. (Lee and Wolgemuth (2011).

Lee and Wolgemuth (2011) applied their model to examine the healing process in a one-dimensional wound. In these wounds, a straight cut is made through the layer of cells and the rate at which the cells fill this area was measured. The dipole stress in this case causes pressure to exert a compressive force into the wounded area; this causes an expansive pressure to be exerted back onto the cell strip. It is this pressure that causes cells to spread over the wounded area (Figure 8) (Lee and Wolgemuth 2011).

Lyme Disease

Lyme disease is caused by the spirochete,Borrelia burgdorferi, which is found in ticks which have a mutualistic relationship with the bacteria. The ticks obtain the bacteria when they bite mice or deer that are infected with Lyme disease. The disease is then transmitted to humans through a bite from an infected tick PubMed: Lyme disease (Diagram 1). Studies with Borrelia burgodferi have discovered a relationship between the bacteria’s motility and its virulence (Dombrowski et al. 2009). These spirochetes have flat-wave morphologies, and it has been found that these bacteria are able to swim due to the thrust generated by the deformation of its cell wall that it caused by the rotation of its periplasmic flagella (Dombrowski et al. 2009) (Figure 9). This deformation of the cell wall generates a force back that causes the periplasmic flagella to also deform (Dombrowski et al. 2009). In order to test whether this qualitative mechanism is sufficient to cause the flat-wave morphology observed in Borrelia burgdorferi, Dombrowski et al. (2009) developed a mathematical model in which they characterized the periplasmic flagella and cell wall of the bacteria as elastic objects (Figure 10).

Figure 9. Diagram of a B. burgdorferi cell. Part of the spirochetes body is magnified to illustrate its cylindrical shape. The cell wall is shown in gray, while the single periplasmic flagella are shown in black. The magnified imaged illustrates two unit vectors e₁ and e₂ that point in the direction of the cell wall. The flagella are located at a point αp₁ from the center-line of the spirochete(denoted by r_f). α is defined as the angle between a unit vector e₁ to p₁. (Dombrowski et al. 2009)

Model of Borrelia burgdorderi

Figure 10. Calculations of the Mathematical Model. (Dombrowski et al. 2009)

Dombrowski et al. (2009) assumed that the flagella of the bacteria are contained to a single position on the outer perimeter of the bacteria’s cell wall, and that the flagella are free to slide. The scientists found that when the cell wall is more rigid than the flagella than the bacteria is almost straight with its flagella wrapping around the cell wall. Furthermore, increasing the ratio of the bacteria’s ratio of twisting to bending the cell wall was observed to deform into the flat-wave morphology that is normally observed in Borrelia burgdorderi (Figure 10a and d) (Dombrowski et al. 2009). Additionally, the model predicted that in this flat-wave morphology the periplasmic flagella will wrap around the cell wall in the direction opposite in which it is located (Dombrowski et al. 2009). When the bacteria’s ratio of twisting to bending is equal to 1.0 the amplitude of the bacteria increases slightly but mostly remains constant, but its wavelength decreases; in this form the shape of the cell is not the normally observed flat-wave morphology, but a flattened helical form (Figure 10c) (Dombrowski et al. 2009). Finally, the scientists observed that increasing the cell’s radius led the cell to morph from a more helical shape to flattened (Figure 10e). Overall, the scientist’s model illustrated that the flat-wave morphology observed in Borrelia burgdorferi is indeed created by the coupling of the helical periplasmic flagella to the cell wall.

Applications of the Model

The model of the mechanical interactions between the perisplamic flagella and cell wall in Borrelia burgdorferi, provides a foundation for understanding the movement of similar species of spirochetes, for example the spirochete, Treponema pallidum, which causes Syphilis in humans. Additionally, while Dombrowski's et al. (2009) model focuses on the filaments that make up spirochetes, their model successfully described the physics involved in general elastic filaments. Therefore, their findings can be applied to other biological structures that are also composed on organized filaments. For example, α-helix proteins are interlinked with each other to from helix bundles that form coiled-coil protein motifs that play a role in HIV infections (Wikipedia: Role of coiled-coil in HIV). Another example, on a molecular scale are the muscle protein,F-actin which are also both composed of several strands of filaments that aid in muscle contraction (Dombrowski et al. 2009). Finally, on a more cellular level, cylindrical micro-tubules make up the major component of eurkaryotic flagella and cilia, known as axoneme, which allows for the flexibility of there filaments (Dombrowski et al. 2009).

Future Directions

Figure 11. Polystyrene balls coated with platinum in hydrogen peroxide solution. The image was taken by transmission electron microscopy. Physics World

Bioengineering artificial swimmers

Bioengineering has led to the proposal and development of artificial swimming devices that can move at low Reynolds number. These devices can be categorized into three separate categories. The first and second group are swimmers that move by deformation of their cell wall; however, they differ because the the first group can orientate themselves in a limited manner, while the second group can take on any form necessary to achieve movement. The third uses chemical reactions to power their locomotion, the chemical reaction leads to an imbalance in osmotic pressure on the body of the organism, which leads to propulsion of the organism i.e. movement (Lauga and Powers 2008). An example, of an artificial swimmer from the third category is placing coating polystyrene balls in a hydrogen peroxide solution and coating them with platinum. Experiments have indicated that these polystyrene balls move with the same velocity as bacteria, thus they could possibly be used to delivery drugs throughout the human body. [2] (Figure 11.)

Manipulating low Reynolds Numbers

Scientists have also been experimentaling with the advantages that can be obtained from solutions that have low Reynolds numbers. Experiments have shown that despite the highly viscous solutions at microscopic levels, swimming bacteria can still perform "cargo-towing"; that is attaching bacteria to solid objects in order to move the objects through the solutions (Lauga and Powers 2008). This concept could be extended to medicine in which a drug is transported through the blood stream, a highly viscous solution, to its target sites. Furthermore, other experiments have revealed that bacteria swimming in fluids with low Reynolds numbers will generate kinetic energy which causes the temperature in the solutions to increase (Lauga and Powers 2008).

Figure 12. Waveforms for flagella. A) Sinusoidal wave B)Sawtooth wave. [1]

Optimization of Cell Motility

Experiments are also underway that are optimizing a cell's movement at low Reynolds number. For example, previous studies have shown that flagella are helical filaments that produce sinusoidal waves (Figure 12a) and optimization studies have been able to show that flagella produce these waves at an angle(θ) = 45⁰. Furthermore, when a bacteria increases its velocity, its flagella will in turn produce quicker rotations, thus increasing the frequency of the sine waves. Optimization studies have now been able to shown that when this phenomenon occurs the flagella lose their sinusoid wave characteristics and instead generate a sawtooth wave (Figure 12b) with an optimal angle(θ) = 40⁰. Thus, optimization studies are useful to measure how the physical characteristics of a bacterium can change at varying conditions (Lauga and Powers 2008).

Conclusions

Recent technological advances have led to an increase in communication between biologists and physicists and this collaboration has led to a more quantitative understanding in the field of biology. Physicists have been able to develop equations and parameters for basic cellular function that allows for the computation of molecular interactions that normally cannot be observed in an experimental center (Wolgemuth 2011). Specifically, in the field cell motility, physicists have been able to create theoretical models that recreate the movement of bacterial cells that range from the a bacterium swarming over an agar plate to evaluating the elastic nature of a bacterium's filaments and the role it plays in Lyme Disease. Overall, the greatest advantage of creating these theoretical models is that they can continually be applied to an endless number of scenarios in the field of biology.

References

Armitage, J.P. and Schmitt, R. “Bacterial chemotaxis: Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Sinorhizobium meliloti-variations on a theme?” Microbiology. 1997. Volume 143, p. 3671-3682

Dombrowski, C., Kan, W., Motaleb, M.A., Charon, N.W., Goldstein, R.E., and Wolgemuth, C.W. “The Elastic Basis for the Shape of Borrelia burgdorderi.” 2009. Volume 96, p. 4409-4417

Happel,J. and Brenner, Howard. “Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics.” Springer. 1991. p. 42

Koing, K., Svaasand, L, Liu, Y., Sonek, G., Patrizio, P., Tadir, Y., Berns, M.W., and Tromberg, B.J. “Determination of motility forces of human spermatozoa using an 800 nm optical trap.” Cellular and Molecular Biology. 1996. Volume 42, issue 4, p. 501-509.

Lauga, E. and Powers, T.R. “The hydrodynamics of swimming microogranisms.” Rep. Prog. Phys. 2008. Volume 79, p. 1-36.

Lee, P. and Wolgemuth, C.W. “Crawling Cells Can Close Wounds without Purse Strings or Signaling. PLoS Computational Biology. 2001. Volume 7, issue 3, p. 1-8

Nabiev, S.R., Ovsyannikov, D.A., Bershitsky, B.Y., and Bershitsky, S.Y. “Optical Trap as a Tool for Studying Motor Proteins.” Biophysics. 2008. Volume 53, issue 6, p. 488-493.

Sharma, M. and Anand, S.K. “Swarming: A coordinate bacterial activity.” Current science. 2002. Volume 83, issue 6. p 707-714

Wolgemuth, C.W. “Collective Swimming and the Dyanmics of Bacterial Turbluence.”Biophysical Journal. 2008. Volume 95, p. 1564-1574

Wolgemuth, C.W. “Does cell biology need physicists?” Physics. 2011. Volume 4, issue 4, p. 1-7

Zhang, H.P., Be’er, A. Smith, R.S., Florin, E.L., and Swinney, H.L. “Swarming dynamics in bacterial colonies.”epi. 2009. Volume 87, p. 1-5.