Rhodococcus ruber

This student page has not been curated.

Classification

Figure 1: Rhodococcus ruber in rod form as a biofilm degrading polystyrene [10]

Domain: Bacteria

Phylum: Actinobacteria

Class: Actinobacteria

Order: Corynbacteriales

Family: Nocardiaceae

Genus: Rhodococcus

Species

NCBI: [2]

Rhodococcus ruber

Description and Significance

Figure 2: Rhodococcus ruber cultured on a trypticase soy broth agar [1]

Historically, the genus Rhodococcus was first defined by Zopf in 1891. Nocardia rubra, or what is known today as Rhodococcus ruber, was isolated from a soil sludge by Kruse in 1896. However, there were issues with classification due to morphological and staining identification techniques. In 1977, Goodfellow and Alderson did a complete reclassification of the genus Rhodococcus, which resulted in Norcordia rubra being amended as Rhodococcus ruber.

The term Rhodococcus is from the combination of the Greek words “rhodon” and “coccus” meaning “the rose” and “the grain“ respectively. The morphological structure of R. ruber first starts as long rods, then breaks off into short rods and cocci throughout different growth phases. Rhodococcus ruber is a gram positive, non-motile, non-spore forming bacteria.

Metabolically and nutritionally diverse

Can do so under limited oxygen and nutrient conditions

Most importantly is that it is ubiquitous in many different habitats

Given that they environmental persistence and tolerance to stress conditions, this makes them good candidates for bioremediation

Significant role in both natural degradation of persistent pollutants and bioremediation of contaminated ecosystems.

Genome Structure

12 genome studies have been reported for the following strains of Rhodococcus ruber: R. ruber str. YC-YT1, R. ruber str. YYL, R. ruber str. P14, R. ruber str. SD3, R. ruber str. R1, R. ruber str. DSM 43338, R. ruber str. P25, R. tuber IEGM 231, R. ruber str. OA1, R. ruber str. BKS 20-38, R. ruber str. Chol-4, and R. ruber str. NCRX 15591.

The genome of Rhodococcus ruber consists of one circular chromosome with an average size of 5.57 Mb. The genome size varies for every strain and larger genome sizes can be attributed to the presence of circular plasmids. The strains of R. ruber that contain plasmids are YC-TC1, YYL, and R1. The average amount of protein coding genes is 4932 and the average G+C content is 70.49%. A high guanine-cytosine content is characteristic of Rhodococcus species to provide DNA stability in varying conditions.

The genome sequences of R. ruber are helpful in identifying the genes necessary for metabolic pathways and cycles that R. ruber employs including the tricarboxylic acid cycle, pentose phosphate pathway, glycolysis, and gluconeogenesis. Additionally, the beta oxidation pathway and alkane degradation pathway are utilized to break down more complex xenobiotic compounds before the classic metabolic pathways are used. The genome highlights multiple metabolic gene clusters that are used for degradation of aromatic compounds, steroids, hydrocarbons, and xenobiotic polymers that R. ruber uses for carbon and energy sources. Some strains of R. ruber contain redundant genes which contributes to their versatile metabolic abilities with various nutrient sources.

Cell Structure and Metabolism

Figure 3: Rhodococcus ruber cell wall structure [1]

Figure 4: []

It is a gram positive, non-motile, non-spore forming.

Mycolic acids= Long chain fatty acids

Mycolic acids with chain lengths of C42-C48; much longer chains than other species of Rhodococcus

Cell envelope lipids

Have pronounced surfactant properties that facilitate the growth of the bacteria on hydrophobic substrates

Laccases are phenol oxidases, which are part of a group of multi-copper enzymes They function by promoting biotic oxidation Adding copper on PE cultures, which enhanced degradation by 75% compared to non-amended cultures Copper helps induce laccase’s oxidizing activity

Ecological Impacts

Figure 5: Biofilm formation of Rhodococcus ruber on polyethylene. A) Attachment to surface B)Formation of monolayer and exopolymeric matrix C)Formation of multilayer microcolony D) Mature biofilm "mushroom" shape [13]

R. ruber will form a biofilm

This has a higher metabolic activity than if it was suspended and the solid surface serves as a substrate for R. ruber, so carbon availability is greater in a biofilm

The colonization of R. ruber to PE is nonspecific

Adheres to solid surface of PE, becomes differentiated from planktonic state, initiates formation of 3D structures of microcolonies, then further organized into multicellular mushroom-like structures that last for 60 + days

Carbon starvation enhanced the hydrophobic interactions, biofilm development, which improved biodegradation of PE

References

[1]| Alvarez, H. M. Biology of Rhodococcus; Springer, 2010; Vol. 16.

[2] | Bala, M.; Kumar, S.; Raghava, G. P. S.; Mayilraj, S. Draft Genome Sequence of Rhodococcus ruber Strain BKS 20-38. Genome Announcements 2013, 1.

[3] | Farkas, C.; Donoso, R. A.; Melis-Arcos, F.; Gárate-Castro, C.; Pérez-Pantoja, D. Complete Genome Sequence of Rhodococcus ruber R1, a Novel Strain Showing a Broad Catabolic Potential toward Lignin-Derived Aromatics. Microbiology Resource Announcements 2020, 9.

[4] | Finnerty, W. R. The Biology and Genetics of the Genus Rhodococcus. Annual Review of Microbiology 1992, 46, 193–218.

[5] | Gravouil, K.; Ferru-Clément, R.; Colas, S.; Helye, R.; Kadri, L.; Bourdeau, L.; Moumen, B.; Mercier, A.; Ferreira, T. Transcriptomics and Lipidomics of the Environmental Strain Rhodococcus ruber Point out Consumption Pathways and Potential Metabolic Bottlenecks for Polyethylene Degradation. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51, 5172–5181.

[6] | Guevara, G.; Lopez, M. C.; Alonso, S.; Perera, J.; Navarro-Llorens, J. M. New insights into the genome of Rhodococcus ruber strain Chol-4. BMC Genomics 2019, 20.

[7] | Heras, L. F. D. L.; Fernández, E. G.; Llorens, J. M. N.; Perera, J.; Drzyzga, O. Morphological, Physiological, and Molecular Characterization of a Newly Isolated Steroid-Degrading Actinomycete, Identified as Rhodococcus ruber Strain Chol-4. Current Microbiology 2009, 59, 548–553.

[8] | Krivoruchko, A.; Kuyukina, M.; Ivshina, I. Advanced Rhodococcus Biocatalysts for Environmental Biotechnologies. Catalysts 2019, 9.

[9] | Montazer, Z.; Najafi, M. B. H.; Levin, D. B. Challenges with Verifying Microbial Degradation of Polyethylene. Polymers 2020, 12.

[10] | Mor, R.; Sivan, A. Biofilm formation and partial biodegradation of polystyrene by the actinomycete Rhodococcus ruber. Biodegradation 2008, 19, 851–858.

[11] Rhodococcus ruber (ID 11562) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/?term=txid1830[Organism:noexp] (accessed 2020).

[12 | Santo, M.; Weitsman, R.; Sivan, A. The role of the copper-binding enzyme – laccase – in the biodegradation of polyethylene by the actinomycete Rhodococcus ruber. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 2013, 84, 204–210.

[13] | Sivan, A.; Szanto, M.; Pavlov, V. Biofilm development of the polyethylene-degrading bacterium Rhodococcus ruber. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2006, 72, 346–352.

Author

Page authored by Hannah von Werder, student of Prof. Jay Lennon at Indiana University.