Talk:Adeno-Associated Viruses as Gene Therapy Vectors: Difference between revisions

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
I think this topic is not only interesting, but medically very exciting. I think this treatment has potential.  
I think this topic is not only interesting, but medically very exciting. I think this treatment has potential.  


One thing I feel that you should incorporate more into your paper is the life cycle and replication of Adeno-Associated Viruses. This is critical for a thorough understanding of how the vectors are incorporated into host DNA.
One thing I feel that you should incorporate more into your paper is the life cycle and replication of Adeno-Associated Viruses. This is critical for a thorough understanding of how the vectors are incorporated into host DNA. You give some details of the life cycle here and there throughout your paper, but consider making a section explicitly on the life cycle.


A structural feature of your paper that I thought was excellent is the division of therapeutic applications. You cover treatment of glioblastoma multiforme, cycstic fibrosis, and parkinson's disease. This shows that gene therapy vectors could be used to battle such serious and relatively common diseases.
A structural feature of your paper that I thought was excellent is the division of therapeutic applications. You cover treatment of glioblastoma multiforme, cycstic fibrosis, and parkinson's disease. This shows that gene therapy vectors could be used to battle such serious and relatively common diseases.
A complete understanding of all the awesome information on your page would require a general background in virology. Although all of the information you've included is accessible to us based on what we've learned in Microbiology lecture, consider ways to make the material accessible to people with other scientific backgrounds. I wouldn't recommend targeting a non-scientific audience with such a complex topic, but think about having a more general audience.

Revision as of 04:29, 21 April 2009

Khalid Eldahan's Comments

I think this topic is not only interesting, but medically very exciting. I think this treatment has potential.

One thing I feel that you should incorporate more into your paper is the life cycle and replication of Adeno-Associated Viruses. This is critical for a thorough understanding of how the vectors are incorporated into host DNA. You give some details of the life cycle here and there throughout your paper, but consider making a section explicitly on the life cycle.

A structural feature of your paper that I thought was excellent is the division of therapeutic applications. You cover treatment of glioblastoma multiforme, cycstic fibrosis, and parkinson's disease. This shows that gene therapy vectors could be used to battle such serious and relatively common diseases.

A complete understanding of all the awesome information on your page would require a general background in virology. Although all of the information you've included is accessible to us based on what we've learned in Microbiology lecture, consider ways to make the material accessible to people with other scientific backgrounds. I wouldn't recommend targeting a non-scientific audience with such a complex topic, but think about having a more general audience.