Ensifer adhaerens

This student page has not been curated.

Classification

Bacteria > Proteobacteria > Alphaproteobacteria > Rhizobiales > Rhizobiacea > Ensifer > Adhaerens

Species

NCBI: Taxonomy

Ensifer adhaerens

Genome Structure

The full-genome sequences of multiple isolates of Ensifer adhaerens have been published [6]. The E. adhaerens isolate Casida A, the first strain of E. adhaerens to be characterized, sequence reveals five replicons totaling 7.2 Mbp and 6641 open reading frames [6]. The 16s rRNA gene places E. adhaerens near the Sinorhizobia phylogenetically, and there is some taxonomic debate as to whether E. adhaerens should be placed within the Sinorhizobia [1,7]. Regardless, the E. adhaerens literature typically resorts to the Ensifer adhaerens name and not Sinorhizobium adhaerens.

Cell Structure, Metabolism and Life Cycle

E. adhaerens is a terrestrial, rod-shaped Alphaproteobacteria that belongs to the Rhizobiales family [1,2,3]. E. adhaerens survives in the soil as a facultative predator of soil bacteria, and was initially identified in screens to determine a microbial factor for Micrococcus luteus’ inability to grow in soil [2,3,4]. E. adhaerens is capable of growth on glucose as a sole substrate in buffered media containing salts, indicating that the predatory behavior of E. adhaerens is not obligatory and that E. adhaerens is biosynthetically competent [2]. As with several other members of the Alphaproteobactiera, Ensifer ahdaerens undergoes a polar budding cell division process [2]. This process is common to Agrobacterium, Rhodopseudonas, and Sinorhizobium [5]. While the genetic and biochemical factors involved in E. adhaerens cell cycle have not been directly studied, the Rhizobial cell division process is a current topic of research and mirrors the effort to characterize the Alphaproteobacteria Caulobacter crescentus cell cycle.

Ecology and Pathogenesis

E. adhaerens is capable of binding to a range of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative bacterial cells; however, the host range of E. adhaerens appears to be limited to primarily Gram-Positive bacteria, which it is capable of lysing [2.3]. Attachment to prey bacteria appears to involve appendages referred to as “Bars” by L.E. Casida in the initial publications detailing the predatory process [3]; the purpose of this appendage is, as of yet, unknown. It is possible that bars function in attachment or promotion of nutrient diffusion to Ensifer cells, however neither of these hypotheses have been assessed. Much of what is known about the predatory habits of Ensifer adhaerens was worked out in the early 1980’s, and few molecular details of the process are known. Remaining areas of study regarding Ensifer predation include what genetic potential is required to act as a bacterial predator, as well as the molecular details of the predatory process. With the recent availability of the Casida strain genome, this area can be studied in greater detail with modern molecular genetics [6]. Potential areas to explore this process in greater detail include transcriptomics and forward genetics screens to determine patterns of gene expression during predation and essential predation genes, respectively.

References

1. Rogel, MA; et al. Nitrogen-Fixing Nodules with Ensifer adhaerens Harboring Rhizobium tropici Symbiotic Plasmids. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67(7):3264-3268
2. Casdia, LE. Bacterial Predators of Micrococcus luteus in Soil. 1980. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 39(5): 1035-1041.
3. Casida, L.E. Jr. Ensifer adhaerens gen. nov., sp. nov.: a Bacterial Predator of Bacteria in Soil. 1982. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 32(3):339-345.
4. Germida, JJ; Casida, LE. 1983. Ensifer adhaerens Predatory Activity Against Other Bacteria in Soil, as Monitored by Indirect Phage Analysis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 45(4):1380-1388.
5. Brown, PJB; et al. Polar Growth in the Alphaproteobacterial order Rhizobiales. 2012. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 109(5): 1697-1701.
6. Williams, LE; et al. Complete Genome Sequence of the Predatory Bacterium Ensifer Adhaerens. 2017. Microbiology Resource Announcements
7. Young, JM. The Genus Name Ensifer Casida 1982 Takes Priority Over Sinorhizobium Chen Et Al. 1988, and Sinorhizobium morelense Wang Et Al. 2002 is a Later Synonym of Ensifer adhaerens Casida 1982. Is the Combination “Sinorhizobium adhaerens” (Casida 1982) Willems Et Al. 2003 Legitimate? Request for an Opinion. 2003. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53(6):2107-2110.
8. Xu, L; et al. 2016. Characterization of the Biosorption and Biodegradation Properties of Ensifer adhaerens: A Potential Agent to Remove Polychlorinated Biphenyls from Contaminated Water. Journal of Hazardous Materials 302: 314-322.
9. Zhou, G; et al. Biodegradation of the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam by the nitrogen-fixing and plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium Ensifer adhaerens strain TMX-23. 2013. Applied Microbial and Cell Physiology 97:4065-4074.
10. Zuniga-Soto, E; et al. Ensifer-mediated Transformation: An Efficient non-Agrobacterium Protocol for the Genetic Modification of Rice. 2015. SpringerPlus 4:600.
11. Zuniga-Soto, E; et al. Insights into the Transcriptomic Response of the Plant Engineering Bacterium Ensifer adhaerens OV14 During Transformation. 2019. Science Reports 9(1):10344.

Author

Page authored by Joseph Stembel, student of Prof. Jay Lennon at IndianaUniversity.