Calcium signaling in plant-microbe interaction: Difference between revisions

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Introduction==
==Introduction==


Calcium ion (Ca<sup>2+</sup>) is an important second messenger involved in many signaling pathways in plants.<ref>[https://academic.oup.com/plcell/article/14/suppl_1/S401/6009910?login=true Sanders Dale et al. “Calcium at the Crossroads of Signaling” 2002. The Plant Cell 14:401–S417.]</ref> The concentration of free Ca<sup>2+</sup> in the cytosol in a plant cell ([Ca<sup>2+</sup>]cyt) connects the extracellular stimuli, including the signal of microbes, to intracellular responses. Since Ca<sup>2+</sup> is neither synthesized nor degraded by plants, [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub>is completely dependent on the entry of external source or release of Ca<sup>2+</sup> from its intracellular stores.<ref>[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.4161/psb.4.11.9800 Vadassery, J. and Oelmüller, R. “Calcium signaling in pathogenic and beneficial plant microbe interactions” 2009. Plant Signaling & Behavior 4:1024-1027.]</ref><ref>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982217305560 Edel, Kai H. et al. “The Evolution of Calcium-Based Signalling in Plants” 2017. Current Biology 27(13):R667-R679.]</ref> However, because Ca<sup>2+</sup> can react with phosphate, the energy source of life, its presence in the cytoplasm will prevent energy metabolism and other cellular activities from taking place.<ref>[https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(20)35866-X/fulltext Carafoli, E. and Krebs, J. “Why calcium? How calcium became the best communicator” 2016. Journal of Biological Chemistry 291(40):20849–57.]</ref> Thus, its concentration is regulated tightly by various proteins. In plant-microbe interaction, different microbes trigger different receptor proteins, causing distinctive Ca<sup>2+</sup> elevation patterns, referred to as Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature. Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature can be different from each other in various aspects: amplitude, duration, frequency, spatial distribution, and times of cycle in [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub>changes. The Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature produced by microbe signal can be decoded by downstream effectors, changing the expression of defense or symbiosis-related genes, resulting in different responses by plants.<ref name=" a ">[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369526617300304#bib0600 Yuan et al. “Calcium signatures and signaling events orchestrate plant–microbe interactions” 2017. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 38:173-183.]</ref><br><br>
Calcium ion (Ca<sup>2+</sup>) is an important second messenger involved in many signaling pathways in plants.<ref>[https://academic.oup.com/plcell/article/14/suppl_1/S401/6009910?login=true Sanders Dale et al. “Calcium at the Crossroads of Signaling” 2002. The Plant Cell 14:401–S417.]</ref> The concentration of free Ca<sup>2+</sup> in the cytosol in a plant cell ([Ca<sup>2+</sup>]cyt) connects the extracellular stimuli, including the signal of microbes, to intracellular responses. Since Ca<sup>2+</sup> is neither synthesized nor degraded by plants, [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub> is completely dependent on the entry of external source or release of Ca<sup>2+</sup> from its intracellular stores.<ref>[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.4161/psb.4.11.9800 Vadassery, J. and Oelmüller, R. “Calcium signaling in pathogenic and beneficial plant microbe interactions” 2009. Plant Signaling & Behavior 4:1024-1027.]</ref><ref>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982217305560 Edel, Kai H. et al. “The Evolution of Calcium-Based Signalling in Plants” 2017. Current Biology 27(13):R667-R679.]</ref> However, because Ca<sup>2+</sup> can react with phosphate, the energy source of life, its presence in the cytoplasm will prevent energy metabolism and other cellular activities from taking place.<ref>[https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(20)35866-X/fulltext Carafoli, E. and Krebs, J. “Why calcium? How calcium became the best communicator” 2016. Journal of Biological Chemistry 291(40):20849–57.]</ref> Thus, its concentration is regulated tightly by various proteins. In plant-microbe interaction, different microbes trigger different receptor proteins, causing distinctive Ca<sup>2+</sup> elevation patterns, referred to as Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature. Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature can be different from each other in various aspects: amplitude, duration, frequency, spatial distribution, and times of cycle in [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub> changes. The Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature produced by microbe signal can be decoded by downstream effectors, changing the expression of defense or symbiosis-related genes, resulting in different responses by plants.<ref name=" a ">[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369526617300304#bib0600 Yuan et al. “Calcium signatures and signaling events orchestrate plant–microbe interactions” 2017. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 38:173-183.]</ref><br><br>
   
   
==Detection of Microbes==
==Detection of Microbes==
Line 11: Line 11:


==Formation of Ca<sup>2+</sup> Signature==
==Formation of Ca<sup>2+</sup> Signature==
After a PRR detect microbes, it triggers an influx of Ca<sup>2+</sup> ion from outside the cell, resulting in a unique Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature.<ref>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674205215002397 Keinath, Nana F. et al. “Live Cell Imaging with R-GECO1 Sheds Light on flg22- and Chitin-Induced Transient [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub> Patterns in Arabidopsis” 2015. Molecular Plant 8(8):1188-1200.]</ref> The activated PRRs have two mechanisms: it can either trigger the entry of Ca<sup>2+</sup> by itself or by activating a downstream receptor. For the first type of mechanism, there are two possibilities. The first possibility is that it can form a complex with the Ca<sup>2+</sup> ion channels on the membrane physically and regulate the activity of the channels. The second possibility is to produce a signaling molecule by itself to bind to Ca<sup>2+</sup> permeable channels or Ca<sup>2+</sup> pumps and activate them. The other mechanism is to activate a downstream receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase (RLCK).<ref name=" a "></ref> Many of the PRRs activate BIK1, a RLCK which activate a NADPH oxidase called RBOHD by phosphorylating it. Activated RBOHD produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, and the ROS interact with Ca<sup>2+</sup> channels and cause an influx of extracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup>, although the precise mechanism is not known.<ref>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931312814000675 Li, Lei et al. “The FLS2-Associated Kinase BIK1 Directly Phosphorylates the NADPH Oxidase RbohD to Control Plant Immunity” 2014. Cell Host & Microbe 15(3):329-338.]</ref> The increase in [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub>can then trigger the release of Ca<sup>2+</sup> from internal sources, further increasing [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]cyt.<ref name=" a "></ref><br><br>
After a PRR detect microbes, it triggers an influx of Ca<sup>2+</sup> ion from outside the cell, resulting in a unique Ca<sup>2+</sup> signature.<ref>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674205215002397 Keinath, Nana F. et al. “Live Cell Imaging with R-GECO1 Sheds Light on flg22- and Chitin-Induced Transient [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub> Patterns in Arabidopsis” 2015. Molecular Plant 8(8):1188-1200.]</ref> The activated PRRs have two mechanisms: it can either trigger the entry of Ca<sup>2+</sup> by itself or by activating a downstream receptor. For the first type of mechanism, there are two possibilities. The first possibility is that it can form a complex with the Ca<sup>2+</sup> ion channels on the membrane physically and regulate the activity of the channels. The second possibility is to produce a signaling molecule by itself to bind to Ca<sup>2+</sup> permeable channels or Ca<sup>2+</sup> pumps and activate them. The other mechanism is to activate a downstream receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase (RLCK).<ref name=" a "></ref> Many of the PRRs activate BIK1, a RLCK which activate a NADPH oxidase called RBOHD by phosphorylating it. Activated RBOHD produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, and the ROS interact with Ca<sup>2+</sup> channels and cause an influx of extracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup>, although the precise mechanism is not known.<ref>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931312814000675 Li, Lei et al. “The FLS2-Associated Kinase BIK1 Directly Phosphorylates the NADPH Oxidase RbohD to Control Plant Immunity” 2014. Cell Host & Microbe 15(3):329-338.]</ref> The increase in [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>cyt</sub> can then trigger the release of Ca<sup>2+</sup> from internal sources, further increasing [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]cyt.<ref name=" a "></ref><br><br>


When PRR detects the presence of nod factors or myc factors, Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling in both cytoplasm and nucleus can happen.<ref name=" b ">[https://www.nature.com/articles/nrmicro2990 Oldroyd, Giles E. D. “Speak, friend, and enter: signalling systems that promote beneficial symbiotic associations in plants” 2013. Nature Reviews Microbiology 11:252-263.]</ref> The influx of Ca<sup>2+</sup> into nucleus is mediated by both Ca<sup>2+</sup> channeling proteins and ATP-powered Ca<sup>2+</sup> pump located on the nucleus membrane, and the influx of Ca<sup>2+</sup> into cytoplasm is likely to be caused by the interaction of ROS with channel proteins.<ref name=" b "></ref><ref>[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03644.x?src=getftr Cardenas, Luis et al. “Fast, transient and specific intracellular ROS changes in living root hair cells responding to Nod factors (NFs)” 2008. The Plant Journal 56:802-813.]</ref><br><br>
When PRR detects the presence of nod factors or myc factors, Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling in both cytoplasm and nucleus can happen.<ref name=" b ">[https://www.nature.com/articles/nrmicro2990 Oldroyd, Giles E. D. “Speak, friend, and enter: signalling systems that promote beneficial symbiotic associations in plants” 2013. Nature Reviews Microbiology 11:252-263.]</ref> The influx of Ca<sup>2+</sup> into nucleus is mediated by both Ca<sup>2+</sup> channeling proteins and ATP-powered Ca<sup>2+</sup> pump located on the nucleus membrane, and the influx of Ca<sup>2+</sup> into cytoplasm is likely to be caused by the interaction of ROS with channel proteins.<ref name=" b "></ref><ref>[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03644.x?src=getftr Cardenas, Luis et al. “Fast, transient and specific intracellular ROS changes in living root hair cells responding to Nod factors (NFs)” 2008. The Plant Journal 56:802-813.]</ref><br><br>

Revision as of 22:40, 5 December 2021

Introduction

Calcium ion (Ca2+) is an important second messenger involved in many signaling pathways in plants.[1] The concentration of free Ca2+ in the cytosol in a plant cell ([Ca2+]cyt) connects the extracellular stimuli, including the signal of microbes, to intracellular responses. Since Ca2+ is neither synthesized nor degraded by plants, [Ca2+]cyt is completely dependent on the entry of external source or release of Ca2+ from its intracellular stores.[2][3] However, because Ca2+ can react with phosphate, the energy source of life, its presence in the cytoplasm will prevent energy metabolism and other cellular activities from taking place.[4] Thus, its concentration is regulated tightly by various proteins. In plant-microbe interaction, different microbes trigger different receptor proteins, causing distinctive Ca2+ elevation patterns, referred to as Ca2+ signature. Ca2+ signature can be different from each other in various aspects: amplitude, duration, frequency, spatial distribution, and times of cycle in [Ca2+]cyt changes. The Ca2+ signature produced by microbe signal can be decoded by downstream effectors, changing the expression of defense or symbiosis-related genes, resulting in different responses by plants.[5]

Detection of Microbes

The first step of a Ca2+ signaling event is the detection of microbes performed by pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), a type of receptor protein located on the plasma membrane of a plant cell. PRRs are capable of recognizing microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs), molecules specific to certain classes of microbes that are present in extracellular space.[6]

Bacteria

All PRRs that can recognize MAMPs of bacteria studied so far are either receptor-like kinase or receptor-like protein. All of them are transmembrane receptors.[7] One example of these PRRs is flagellin-sensitive 2 (FLS2), which recognizes the flagellin protein in bacteria flagellum.[8] MAMPs of symbiotic bacteria can also be recognized by PPRs. A lysin-motif (LysM) receptor-like kinase, nodulation (nod) factor perception (NFP), can recognize lipochitooligosaccharide in the nod factor released by symbiotic bacteria such as rhizobia.[9]

Fungi

An example of PRRs capable of recognizing fungi is the LysM-receptor kinase 5 and chitin elicitor receptor kinase 1 receptor complex, which recognizes chitin in the cell wall of fungi.[10] Lysin-motif (LysM) receptor-like kinases also recognize myc factors released by symbiotic fungi such as mycorrhizal fungi.[11]

Formation of Ca2+ Signature

After a PRR detect microbes, it triggers an influx of Ca2+ ion from outside the cell, resulting in a unique Ca2+ signature.[12] The activated PRRs have two mechanisms: it can either trigger the entry of Ca2+ by itself or by activating a downstream receptor. For the first type of mechanism, there are two possibilities. The first possibility is that it can form a complex with the Ca2+ ion channels on the membrane physically and regulate the activity of the channels. The second possibility is to produce a signaling molecule by itself to bind to Ca2+ permeable channels or Ca2+ pumps and activate them. The other mechanism is to activate a downstream receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase (RLCK).[5] Many of the PRRs activate BIK1, a RLCK which activate a NADPH oxidase called RBOHD by phosphorylating it. Activated RBOHD produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as H2O2, and the ROS interact with Ca2+ channels and cause an influx of extracellular Ca2+, although the precise mechanism is not known.[13] The increase in [Ca2+]cyt can then trigger the release of Ca2+ from internal sources, further increasing [Ca2+]cyt.[5]

When PRR detects the presence of nod factors or myc factors, Ca2+ signaling in both cytoplasm and nucleus can happen.[14] The influx of Ca2+ into nucleus is mediated by both Ca2+ channeling proteins and ATP-powered Ca2+ pump located on the nucleus membrane, and the influx of Ca2+ into cytoplasm is likely to be caused by the interaction of ROS with channel proteins.[14][15]

Decoding of Ca2+ Signature

As [Ca2+]cyt change, the Ca2+ signature is decoded by Ca2+ sensor proteins.[5] There are various types of sensor proteins in plants that can bind to Ca2+ ions, and they respond to the rise in [Ca2+]cyt in two different ways. The first possible type are Calmodulin (CaM) and CaM-like proteins (CMLs). Binding to Ca2+ changes their structures and enable them to bind to their targets, calcineurin b-like proteins (CBLs). CBLs then interact with CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs), enzymes that are capable of phosphorylation.[16] The second possible way a sensor can decode the Ca2+ signature is that the sensor has a kinase domain of its own and can phosphorylate other molecules directly. An example of this type of sensor is Ca2+-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs or CPKs).[16]


Conclusion


References

  1. Sanders Dale et al. “Calcium at the Crossroads of Signaling” 2002. The Plant Cell 14:401–S417.
  2. Vadassery, J. and Oelmüller, R. “Calcium signaling in pathogenic and beneficial plant microbe interactions” 2009. Plant Signaling & Behavior 4:1024-1027.
  3. Edel, Kai H. et al. “The Evolution of Calcium-Based Signalling in Plants” 2017. Current Biology 27(13):R667-R679.
  4. Carafoli, E. and Krebs, J. “Why calcium? How calcium became the best communicator” 2016. Journal of Biological Chemistry 291(40):20849–57.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Yuan et al. “Calcium signatures and signaling events orchestrate plant–microbe interactions” 2017. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 38:173-183.
  6. Lu, You and Tsuda, Kenichi. “Intimate Association of PRR- and NLR-Mediated Signaling in Plant Immunity” 2020. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 34(1):3-14.
  7. Segonzac, Cécile and Zipfel, Cyril. “Activation of plant pattern-recognition receptors by bacteria” 2011. Current Opinion in Microbiology 14(1): 54-61.
  8. Chinchilla, D. et al. “A flagellin-induced complex of the receptor FLS2 and BAK1 initiates plant defence” 2007. Nature 448: 497-500.
  9. Gough, Clare and Jacquet, Christophe. “Nod factor perception protein carries weight in biotic interactions” 2013. Trends in Plant Science 18(10): 566-574.
  10. Liu, T. et al. “Chitin-Induced Dimerization Activates a Plant Immune Receptor” 2012. Science 336(6085): 1160-1164.
  11. Gust, Andrea A. et al. “Plant LysM proteins: modules mediating symbiosis and immunity” 2012. Trends in Plant Science 17(8): 495-502.
  12. Keinath, Nana F. et al. “Live Cell Imaging with R-GECO1 Sheds Light on flg22- and Chitin-Induced Transient [Ca2+cyt Patterns in Arabidopsis” 2015. Molecular Plant 8(8):1188-1200.]
  13. Li, Lei et al. “The FLS2-Associated Kinase BIK1 Directly Phosphorylates the NADPH Oxidase RbohD to Control Plant Immunity” 2014. Cell Host & Microbe 15(3):329-338.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Oldroyd, Giles E. D. “Speak, friend, and enter: signalling systems that promote beneficial symbiotic associations in plants” 2013. Nature Reviews Microbiology 11:252-263.
  15. Cardenas, Luis et al. “Fast, transient and specific intracellular ROS changes in living root hair cells responding to Nod factors (NFs)” 2008. The Plant Journal 56:802-813.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Seybold, Heike et al. “Ca2+ signalling in plant immune response: from pattern recognition receptors to Ca2+ decoding mechanisms” 2014. New Phytologist 204:782-790.


Edited by Yueqi Song, student of Joan Slonczewski for BIOL 116 Information in Living Systems, 2021, Kenyon College.