Countermeasures of Bacillus anthracis use as a Biological Weapon

Biological Weapon Overview

[Image 1] Envelopes and letters used by attacker in the 2001 anthrax attack on United States citizens. Source: [1]

Biological Weapons with varying degrees of lethality have been used for many centuries and deliver toxic classifications of microorganisms such as bacteria and viruses in such a manner that causes widespread disease among many different living organisms. While intentional infection of animals and agriculture can be fear-inducing and economically detrimental, it is the infliction of disease within the human race itself that can have an extremely dramatic effect on a country’s ability to function. The use of such weapons started off in a rather elementary and blunt fashion. For example, in 1346, citizens of Kaffa (Located on the Crimean Peninsula) were attacked by the invading Tartar army via exposure to plagued corpses leading to widespread of illness.[2] We have now begun to experience much more subtle, but increasingly efficient uses of biological weapons, as displayed in the anthrax letter attack on multiple media and news offices and two United States senators in 2001, where 17 people were infected and five were killed as a result of exposure to anthrax spores(Image 1). [3]

While some may underestimate the possible impact of biological weapons relative to that of other weapons of mass destruction, such attacks should not by any means be taken lightly. A large factor as to why people do not necessarily see the potential for danger is due to the fact that the impact is more often than not initially undetectable, and even the full potential of exposure can be delayed since most weapons of this nature can live outside of a host organism for long periods of time while dormant. As such, biological weapons can be transmissible and can travel from one infected person to another; perpetuating the spread of the virus. In conjunction, these pathogens require a certain incubation period that varies from one pathogenetic species to another, so it is quite likely that an infected individual can transfer the disease before they are aware that they are affected.

Clearly, it is becoming increasingly necessary to take precautious measures against the spread of these disease-spreading biological weapons. There are a couple international policies currently in place to help in the prevention of their use: The 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibits the use of biological weapons in warfare while the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention places restrictions on production, development, and acquisition of biological agents with malicious intentions. [3] While these are legitimate means of prevention, it is equally critical if not more important to undertake means of treatment post-infection since the increasing availability of biotechnology is making the development and dissipation of dangerous microorganisms much easier than ever before.

As foreseeable, there are a seemingly endless number of microorganisms that can be used maliciously. The selection of a biological weapon is dependent on the type of attack desired, the pathogenicity of the organism, and the incubation period (amount of time observed between exposure and symptomatic illness expression) [2]. Due to the nature of biological attacks and terrorism, some toxins are more desirable to the attacker than others. One pathogen that is especially effective is anthrax, whose etiological agent is Bacillus anthracis.

Bacillus anthracis

[Image 2] Robert Koch's original photomicrographs of Bacillus anthracis which is indicated by the relatively large size of the cells, the square ends, and centrally located elliptical spores. Source: http://www.textbookofbacteriology.net/Anthrax.html

Bacillus anthracis has developed as a biological weapon and bioterror agent as a result of this specific bacterium's toxicity in its vegetative form, and its ability to produce spores that are tolerable of many extreme environments. This bacillus became the first bacterium to be directly linked to causing disease when scientist Robert Koch acquired a pure culture and successfully produced anthrax experimentally [4]. Koch proved the causative link to the disease by implementing his widely accepted postulates, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1905 [5]. The following parameters were applied in the determination that Bacillus anthracis was responsible for anthrax [5]:
(1). The microbe was found in all cases of the disease, but not present in healthy individulas.
(2). The microorganism was able to be isolated from the diseased host and then grown in a pure culture.
(3). When microbe from pure culture was introduced into a healthy, susceptible host/ model the same disease was observed.
(4). When the disease from the newly infected host was cultured, the same strain was observed with the same characteristics as initially observed.
In addition to proving the causative link from the bacterium to the disease, Koch as also able to demonstrate the ability of the bacillus to for endospores.

The anthrax bacillus is a relatively large organism measuring 1-1.2 micrometers in width and 3-5 micrometers in length. This specific bacillus can be distinguished from similar bacterium such as B. thuringiensis and B. cereus by its characteristic square-shaped ends, and centrally located ellipsoidal endospore which is associated with production of an intracellular parasporal crystal (a protein crystal)[7]. B. anthracis is a Gram-positive rod with spore forming capabilities. It is these spores formed by the bacterium that are what enable this species to be effective as a biological threat if incidentally brought into contact.

Endospores

[Image 3] Scanning Electron Micrograph of Bacillus anthracis endospores. Source: [6]

Since the bacterium in classified as a Gram-positive organism, this allows for interestingly durable spore formations. The spores produced are resistant to relatively extreme environmental conditions and because of their thick cell walls with a high amount of peptidoglycan, they have the ability to potentially exist in a dormant state for years and even decades [8]. When these spores are either inhaled or ingested,

Section 1

Include some current research, with at least one figure showing data.

Lethal Factor Inhibition

‎

[Figure 2] Crystal Structure of LFI bound to LF. (A) Overlay of full-length LF and truncated version used in study performed by research team. (B) Computer-generated molecular surface of LF around inhibitor binding site. (C) LFI bound to LF. Source: "Anthrax lethal factor inhibition"

Section 3

Include some current research, with at least one figure showing data.

Conclusion

Overall text length at least 3,000 words, with at least 3 figures.

References

[1] ["http://www.textbookofbacteriology.net/Anthrax.html"

[2] Introduction to Biological Weapons. 2010. Federation of American Scientists

[3] “Amerithrax Investigation” Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2010.

[4] [[5] Todar, K. "Bacillus anthracis and Anthrax". Todar's Online Textbook of Bacteriology. 2009.

[5] [Slonczewski, Joan L., J.W. Foster. "Microbiology: An Evolving Science". Koch's Postulates Link a Pathogen with a Disease. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. New York, N.Y. 2009. p.21-22.]

[6] [http://srs.dl.ac.uk/Annual_Reports/AnRep01_02/anthrax-spores.jpg

[7] [Aronson, Arthur I., D.J. Tyrell, P.C. Fitz-James, and L.A. Bulla Jr. July 1982. "Relationship of the Syntheses of Spore Coat Protein and Parasporal Crystal Protein in Bacillus thuringiensis" Journal of Bacteriology Vol. 151. No.1: 399-410.]

Edited by student of Joan Slonczewski for BIOL 238 Microbiology, 2010, Kenyon College.