Metabolic Processes in Rhodopseudomonas palustris

From MicrobeWiki, the student-edited microbiology resource
Revision as of 00:16, 26 April 2014 by Pearlmana (talk | contribs)

Introduction

A digitally-colorized image of Rhodopseudomonas palustris obtained via electron microscopy (from the cover of the American Society for Microbiology).


By A. Pearlman

Rhodopseudomonas palustris, recognizable by its purple color, is a gram-negative alpha proteobacterium commonly found in pond and river water as well as the surface of soil and rock. They do not typically form any sort of biofilm. The species is capable of a remarkably wide host of metabolic processes, including aerobic respiration, anxoygenic photosynthesis (Harwood Lab), carbon fixation, nitrogen fixation, and extracellular electron transfer. These modes of metabolism are not all active at once, and are triggered in response to certain environmental cues. In order to support all these processes efficiently, much of its 5.5 million bp genome is devoted to regulation, signaling, and transport (Figure 1). Furthermore, its genome has an unusually smaller number of redundancies (theoretically to maximize the amount of varying information that can be stored) and does not appear to bear the products of many phage genome integrations or horizontal gene transfers, further begging the question of how it was able to evolve so many different metabolisms (Larimer et. al 2004).

R. palustris has two potential reproduction cycles that it may follow, depending on the environmental conditions. Much of the energy used in the reproduction process is derived from light-based metabolism, and is possible in anaerobic and aerobic conditions. In the presence of oxygen, R. palustris will generally undergo budding, resulting in two daughter cells (Figure). One of these daughter cells will not be motile and will possess a stalk (derived from the original parent cell), while the other will be motile and is classified as a "swarmer." Under hypoxic conditions, R. palustris cells will develop "intracytoplasmic membranes vesicles" that eventually differentiate into the daughter cells. It should be noted that some degree of light is necessary for this process. (Achanta)
The aerobic reproduction proceeds via 4 primary steps:

  • First, a bud begins to form opposite of the parent cell's flagellum. This bud is tubular in shape, and extends to up to two times the size of the parent body. The tube was shown to be relatively elastic, and was able to bend around nearby detritus if necessary.
  • In the second stage, the far end of the tube-like bud grows to a more spherical shape as its organelles develop more.
  • After sufficient growth of the bud, the parent and daughter cells divide in an asymmetric fashion, with the parent cell retaining most of the tube-like appendage. As the division happens, the daughter cell is able to move/swim away from the parent. The parent cell, however, is no longer motile at all.
  • In the fourth stage, the daughter cell matures by growing in length to the shape typical of R. palustris and eventually appears identical to the parent cell after enough development, save that it possesses motile ability.


The parent cell still possesses the ability to reproduce normally, and has actually been shown to reproduce faster than before, as it has already developed the tube-like structure where the bud forms (its reproduction time has been shown to be 210 minutes on average). The daughter cells can reproduce as well, but will have to completely develop the budding structure before that is possible (resulting in a reproduction time of about 221 minutes total). (Whittenbury & McLee 1967)

Overview


Include some current research, with at least one figure showing data.

Figure 1. The purpose of sequences within the R. palustris genome, by percentage of total (Larimer et. al 2004).
Figure 2. Overview of the 4 main modes of metabolism that R. palustris is capable of using. "Central Metabolism" through key enzymes is designates by the multicolored orb in the bottom left of each example cell. (Larimer et. al 2004).

Extracellular Electron Transfer

Figure 3. Experimental design and conditions used to determine which of the tested compounds were viable electron sources for R. palustris EET. (Bose et. al 2014).