Phage Therapy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
===Delivery to targeted pathogens=== | ===Delivery to targeted pathogens=== | ||
<br> When phages were first discovered and applied in a clinical setting for the treatment of diseases, they were injected in the vicinity of the infection. Later mechanisms of delivery included topical administration 3 times a day, eye drops, or orally before meals (Inal 2003). Phages, unlike many antibiotic molecules, are not diffusible across membranes and must therefore have a method of delivery to the target cells. Some researchers believe that the best delivery mechanism may lie in using other nonpathogenic species of bacteria to bring the phage to its pathogenic target. | <br> When phages were first discovered and applied in a clinical setting for the treatment of diseases, they were injected in the vicinity of the infection. Later mechanisms of delivery included topical administration 3 times a day, eye drops, or orally before meals (Inal 2003). Phages, unlike many antibiotic molecules, are not diffusible across membranes and must therefore have a method of delivery to the target cells. Some researchers believe that the best delivery mechanism may lie in using other nonpathogenic species of bacteria to bring the phage to its pathogenic target. | ||
<br> study by Broxmeyer et al (2002) investigated the effectiveness of phage treatment of an intracellular human pathogen by using a mouse model. The study tested the ability of a mycobacteriophage delivered by a nonvirulent mycobacterium to kill <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> and <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>. These disease are common in sufferers of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and though there have been some advancements in treatment in recent years, their effectiveness is limited by drug resistance and the fact that most of their modes of action require that the target is not in a dormant period. The researchers used vacuoles within macrophages to deliver the phage and found that treatment of <i>M. avium</i>-infected and to an even greater extent <i>M. tuberculosis</i>- infected cells with the phage resulted in decreased bacterial numbers (Figure 1). They capitalized on the fact that infecting macrophages with both <i>M. avium</i> and <i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i> (the delivery bacteria for the TM4 lytic phage) leads to fusion of the vacuoles of the two, which in turn results in delivery of the phage to the target pathogenic bacteria. A decrease in <i>M. avium</i> number was seen when treated with the delivery bacteria, but a far greater decrease was seen when it was coinfected with the delivery bacteria plus the TM4 phage (Figure 1). (Broxmeyer et al 2002). | <br> study by Broxmeyer et al (2002) investigated the effectiveness of phage treatment of an intracellular human pathogen by using a mouse model. The study tested the ability of a mycobacteriophage delivered by a nonvirulent mycobacterium to kill <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> and <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>. These disease are common in sufferers of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and though there have been some advancements in treatment in recent years, their effectiveness is limited by drug resistance and the fact that most of their modes of action require that the target is not in a dormant period. The researchers used vacuoles within macrophages to deliver the phage and found that treatment of <i>M. avium</i>-infected and to an even greater extent <i>M. tuberculosis</i>- infected cells with the phage resulted in decreased bacterial numbers (Figure 1). They capitalized on the fact that infecting macrophages with both <i>M. avium</i> and <i>Mycobacterium smegmatis</i> (the delivery bacteria for the TM4 lytic phage) leads to fusion of the vacuoles of the two, which in turn results in delivery of the phage to the target pathogenic bacteria. A decrease in <i>M. avium</i> number was seen when treated with the delivery bacteria, but a far greater decrease was seen when it was coinfected with the delivery bacteria plus the TM4 phage (Figure 1). (Broxmeyer et al 2002). | ||
This study provides promising support to the potential for the use of other bacteria as a delivery mechanism for bacteriophages to treat pathogenic diseases. | This study provides promising support to the potential for the use of other bacteria as a delivery mechanism for bacteriophages to treat pathogenic diseases. | ||
Revision as of 22:44, 17 April 2010
Introduction
At right is a sample image insertion. It works for any image uploaded anywhere to MicrobeWiki. The insertion code consists of:
Double brackets: [[
Filename: PHIL_1181_lores.jpg
Thumbnail status: |thumb|
Pixel size: |300px|
Placement on page: |right|
Legend/credit: Electron micrograph of the Ebola Zaire virus. This was the first photo ever taken of the virus, on 10/13/1976. By Dr. F.A. Murphy, now at U.C. Davis, then at the CDC.
Closed double brackets: ]]
Other examples:
Bold
Italic
Subscript: H2O
Superscript: Fe3+
Introduce the topic of your paper. What microorganisms are of interest? Habitat? Applications for medicine and/or environment?
Comparison to antibiotics
Advantages
Include some current research, with at least one figure showing data.
Disadvantages
text
Mechanism of action
Delivery to targeted pathogens
When phages were first discovered and applied in a clinical setting for the treatment of diseases, they were injected in the vicinity of the infection. Later mechanisms of delivery included topical administration 3 times a day, eye drops, or orally before meals (Inal 2003). Phages, unlike many antibiotic molecules, are not diffusible across membranes and must therefore have a method of delivery to the target cells. Some researchers believe that the best delivery mechanism may lie in using other nonpathogenic species of bacteria to bring the phage to its pathogenic target.
study by Broxmeyer et al (2002) investigated the effectiveness of phage treatment of an intracellular human pathogen by using a mouse model. The study tested the ability of a mycobacteriophage delivered by a nonvirulent mycobacterium to kill Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. These disease are common in sufferers of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and though there have been some advancements in treatment in recent years, their effectiveness is limited by drug resistance and the fact that most of their modes of action require that the target is not in a dormant period. The researchers used vacuoles within macrophages to deliver the phage and found that treatment of M. avium-infected and to an even greater extent M. tuberculosis- infected cells with the phage resulted in decreased bacterial numbers (Figure 1). They capitalized on the fact that infecting macrophages with both M. avium and Mycobacterium smegmatis (the delivery bacteria for the TM4 lytic phage) leads to fusion of the vacuoles of the two, which in turn results in delivery of the phage to the target pathogenic bacteria. A decrease in M. avium number was seen when treated with the delivery bacteria, but a far greater decrease was seen when it was coinfected with the delivery bacteria plus the TM4 phage (Figure 1). (Broxmeyer et al 2002).
This study provides promising support to the potential for the use of other bacteria as a delivery mechanism for bacteriophages to treat pathogenic diseases.
Section 3
Include some current research, with at least one figure showing data.
Conclusion
Overall text length at least 3,000 words, with at least 3 figures.
References
Broxmeyer, L., Sosnowska, D., Miltner, E., Chacon, O., Wagner, D., McGarvey, J., Barletta, R.G., and Bermudez, L.E. "Killing of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a Mycobacteriophage Delivered by a Nonvirulent Mycobacterium: A Model for Phage Therapy of Intracellular Bacterial Pathogens". The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2002. Volume 186, Number 8. p. 1155-1160.
Clark, J.R. and March, J.B. "Bacteriophages and biotechnology: vaccines, gene therapy and antibacterials". TRENDS in Biotechnology. 2006. Volume 24, Number 5. p. 212-218.
Inal, J.M. "Phage Therapy: a Reappraisal of Bacteriophages as Antibiotics". Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis. 2003. Volume 51. p. 237-244.
